foobar2000: Encoders or not?

[1chaoticadult]

I'm making this poll in an attempt to try and make this installer smaller than it is. I want to see what people want. People who use my foobar2000 inno setup please respond and let me know. Later.

[mrmr]

hallo

but why you don't make a 2 packets installer?

- FIRST - "base" foobar200

- SECOND - "pluging" foobar2000

the first one only with an "ultra lite" foobar2000 and the second with all the plugin that you want...a sfx will be enought...maybe add instructions to permit everyone to build his own second "plugin" packet...

It's only an idea...but keep in mind this! B)

mrmr

[1chaoticadult]

@mrmr

An sfx is not clean way of installing foobar2000. two installers is not the answer. I'm asking if put really need the encoders or not. If not then I will remove them.

[gon freecs]

support for cli, yes. but including encoders in the package isn't a good idea. it just adds lots of progs people barely use, uselessly increasing the size of the package. encoders found on the web are often more up to date than those found in foobar's package.

just add links to sites like rarewares or hydrogenaudio, you can find quite a lot of encoders there.

[1chaoticadult]

@gon freecs

That's what I am thinking about doing. Thanks for your input.

[1chaoticadult]

well guys you can keep voting if ya want but I've decided to remove the encoders but links to websites that have them will be part of the installer. Thanks for everyone's feedback.