Dixel Posted June 5, 2024 Posted June 5, 2024 On 6/3/2024 at 12:38 PM, win32 said: Other features such as a UA/UACH spoofer That's already been solved, along with other fingerprinting defences like Client Rects, I sent you a message. Writing here, too, in case you read without logging in. Regards. 4
UCyborg Posted June 5, 2024 Posted June 5, 2024 This branch is 1256 commits ahead of, 36159 commits behind chromium/chromium:main. What does an average Joe get out of those commits?
win32 Posted June 6, 2024 Posted June 6, 2024 20 hours ago, UCyborg said: What does an average Joe get out of those commits? You would get the equivalent of a nightly build or one of these automatically-built snapshots: https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-snapshots/index.html 1
UCyborg Posted June 6, 2024 Posted June 6, 2024 It was more of a philosophical question concerning the crazy rate of changes to the code.
Dixel Posted June 16, 2024 Posted June 16, 2024 (edited) @NotHereToPlayGames, did a bit of digging regarding the slow startups/hang ups you get. By any chance, do you have Direct X9.0 A/B/C redist installed? EDIT. OS doesn't matter. Edited June 16, 2024 by Dixel 4
NotHereToPlayGames Posted June 16, 2024 Posted June 16, 2024 56 minutes ago, Dixel said: do you have Direct X9.0 A/B/C redist installed? Nope, not in XP and not in 10.
Dixel Posted June 16, 2024 Posted June 16, 2024 3 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: Nope, not in XP and not in 10. Good! In my case that severely outdated piece of garbage from 2001 package added about a couple of seconds to the start of each browser. Another reason I found, old versions of Nero. Probably due to the bundled severely outdated codecs. Take a look at your third party codecs (if you have any). Shark, K-Light, etc. 3
NotHereToPlayGames Posted June 16, 2024 Posted June 16, 2024 Zero third-party codecs in 10. Zero in the XP VM that browsers are tested in. Do use an older version of K-Lite on my host XP.
Dixel Posted June 17, 2024 Posted June 17, 2024 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: Zero third-party codecs in 10. Zero in the XP VM that browsers are tested in. Do use an older version of K-Lite on my host XP. Is there a chance you try on a totally clean OS? I recently had to help someone with a fresh install and tried several browsers there, all of them started waaaaay faster! I assume it may be a conflict with old software. You can also check and see, Chrome tries to load old codecs upon start. Look here: chrome://conflicts 3
Dixel Posted June 17, 2024 Posted June 17, 2024 On 6/3/2024 at 12:38 PM, win32 said: Other features such as a UA/UACH spoofer and UI customization were being worked on as well. Win32, hello, thanks for everything, please add the ability to customize HTTP2 data like header_table_size and window_size, etc. There's a library that already implemented http2 spoofing: https://github.com/Noooste/azuretls-client I assume you can use their code, I had also sent you a message with another idea, but you don't visit MSFN again.... 3
NotHereToPlayGames Posted June 17, 2024 Posted June 17, 2024 4 hours ago, Dixel said: Is there a chance you try on a totally clean OS? Always a totally clean OS. I always do browser tests in a VM "clone" of a totally clean brand new OS install. My brand new OS install is NEVER touched. It is "cloned" and any-and-all tests are done in that CLONE. Then the CLONE is DELETED. Then the NEVER TOUCHED is re-CLONED the next time I need to run the VM. The never-touched VM basically STAYS at "seconds from just after a brand new install" for LIFE.
Saxon Posted June 19, 2024 Posted June 19, 2024 Seems to me, could the reason for that slowness. "At start chromium checking HMAC-ed values from Secure Preferences file and registry and actual values. When disable-machine-id just toggled sure HMACs will not match and all related data will be lost." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/645 1
Saxon Posted June 21, 2024 Posted June 21, 2024 People already write about Supermium 124.0.6367.245, but only Supermium 122.0.6261.152 (R6) - "SECURITY PATCH" is available for download. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/681 1
ED_Sln Posted June 21, 2024 Posted June 21, 2024 (edited) 40 minutes ago, Saxon said: but only Supermium 122.0.6261.152 (R6) - "SECURITY PATCH" is available for download. Here it is, at the very top 124 version, but pre-release: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases Except that instead of the x32 version there are debug files. Edited June 21, 2024 by ED_Sln 1
VistaLover Posted June 21, 2024 Posted June 21, 2024 12 hours ago, Saxon said: People already write about Supermium 124.0.6367.245, but only Supermium 122.0.6261.152 (R6) - "SECURITY PATCH" is available for download. 12 hours ago, ED_Sln said: Except that instead of the x32 version there are debug files ... Read these GitHub comments, if one's after the x86 binaries: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/686#issuecomment-2183203030 https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/686#issuecomment-2183230334 2
Recommended Posts