Sampei.Nihira Posted Friday at 01:26 PM Share Posted Friday at 01:26 PM Proper blocking of trackers also speeds up the loading of web pages. Check the website below. Proper blocking of trackers in your uBlock Origin installed in Supermium/Thorium must be more (9) than those in the image: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-H Posted Friday at 01:56 PM Share Posted Friday at 01:56 PM 1 hour ago, AstroSkipper said: And the very best is that now both posts have disappeared completely. Who has deleted them? I simply replied to a post addressed to me. And above all, why both? What's going on here? I deleted the original posts because they were off-topic. Unfortunately, they then still generated an ongoing conversation. Perhaps I should have just moved them to the forum issues section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixel Posted Friday at 07:18 PM Share Posted Friday at 07:18 PM (edited) Screen for @AstroSkipper EDIT: Note, spaces 20 20 20 ... starting at offset 170CA4 are simply reserved for short testing flags like --no-sandbox flag, so you can start typing right there. My loader is unified, and will work for Supermium, also. Edited Friday at 07:31 PM by Dixel 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixel Posted Friday at 07:28 PM Share Posted Friday at 07:28 PM (edited) Important. @AstroSkipper The fact Supermium and Thorium still need these flags can only tell one thing, the portable patch is NOT applied by the author, the information on the site is misleading, to put it politely, so the browser is not fully portable, and if you start this browser without these flags, your old profile is gone! --disable-machine-id --disable-encryption Edited Friday at 07:29 PM by Dixel 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted Friday at 08:16 PM Share Posted Friday at 08:16 PM (edited) 1 hour ago, Dixel said: Screen for @AstroSkipper EDIT: Note, spaces 20 20 20 ... starting at offset 170CA4 are simply reserved for short testing flags like --no-sandbox flag, so you can start typing right there. My loader is unified, and will work for Supermium, also. Thanks for clarification! I will edit it to my needs. Edited Friday at 08:38 PM by AstroSkipper Update of content 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixel Posted Friday at 11:47 PM Share Posted Friday at 11:47 PM (edited) 6 hours ago, AstroSkipper said: Thanks for clarification! I will edit it to my needs. Start with a clean profile, add a short amount, starting with --no-default-browser-check --no-first-run --disable-breakpad --disable-machine-id --disable-encryption Add a bit more, try, and so on. Don't touch its own flags page as of yet! We need to determine what exactly is the reason for possible conflicts. P.S. You don't need to add user agent string and user directory --user-data-dir="%~dp0%\USER_DATA" It's already in the loader! Obviously, now your current profile starts only from the loader. No "bat" or whatever he included. Edited Friday at 11:52 PM by Dixel P.S> 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Draker Posted Saturday at 07:12 PM Share Posted Saturday at 07:12 PM On 5/10/2024 at 5:11 AM, UCyborg said: Windows XP is so bad they have to emulate Windows 7+ (APIs) to make it run on XP. Are you sure? More like it's windows 10 emulator, no chrome after 109 can run on Windows 7. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saxon Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago Someone claims we need to start being beware of Fake Supermium. How do we know whether it's true, there's no official statement by win32. https://twitter.com/Supermium Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 9 hours ago, Saxon said: How do we know whether it's true Easy. By taking some personal responsibility and knowing if you downloaded from an OFFICIAL source or if you just clicked some random link that some random person on some random web site directed you to. Doesn't sound very complicated to me. We used to call it "net savvy". And it is the "net savvy" consumer that has NEVER been hit with malware yet also NEVER runs real-time "protection". We used to also call it "practice safe hex". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hidao Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: Easy. By taking some personal responsibility and knowing if you downloaded from an OFFICIAL source or if you just clicked some random link that some random person on some random web site directed you to. Doesn't sound very complicated to me. We used to call it "net savvy". And it is the "net savvy" consumer that has NEVER been hit with malware yet also NEVER runs real-time "protection". We used to also call it "practice safe hex". Defently agree with you... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VistaLover Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 14 hours ago, Saxon said: there's no official statement by win32 ... Be that as it may, win32's close collaborator and co-maintainer/administrator of Supermium's GitHub issue tracker, docrR, has already posted this: https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/567 (BTW, that X link won't open/display for those without an account/those browsing X anonymously); the issue has also been pinned in the tracker, so it's difficult to not notice it ... 5 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: Easy. By taking some personal responsibility and knowing if you downloaded from an OFFICIAL source or if you just clicked some random link that some random person on some random web site directed you to. ... My thoughts exactly - this doesn't mean that official sources of any given software are 100% immune to being tampered with, but this doesn't seem to be the case here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
user57 Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago 15 hours ago, Saxon said: Someone claims we need to start being beware of Fake Supermium. How do we know whether it's true, there's no official statement by win32. https://twitter.com/Supermium it would be no wonder when some anti virus is coming and claim that to be either malware, virus, trojan horse, potentional unwanted software in the past that was a discussion when microsoft for example handle all results what are virus are - they decide , in fact many marked sams one core api as virus , or my version changer (while being complete open source) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now