Jump to content

Performence Tips For Vista? (Support Tips)


legacyfan

Recommended Posts

I'm working on speeding up my vista install more (kind of like an early spring cleaning) and was wondering what the best methods to do this are (with out registry cleaners and removers) if anyone could help with this would be much appreciated 

Edited by legacyfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's been a long time since I've used Vista but I do recall that the very VERY first thing I did after each and EVERY startup was to go into Task Manager and manually disable two (three?) Task Scheduler processes because I never hunted down a method to disable it permanently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, you should buy an SSD or at least make RAID 0 of two HDDs (not very safe for data). Try to disable indexing and automatic defragmentation (and do it for the system drive, by the way) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dug up my ancient Vista VirtualBox VM.

It runs the same config that I ran when I had Vista on one of my laptops (that laptop died and I opted to not bring it back to life due to it only having Vista [was never really a fan of Vista]).

My VM has two Task Scheduler processes that I kill on startup (this also disables "auto defrag" [I hate hate hate auto defrag!]).

My number of processes via Task Manager is 29.  But two of those are VirtualBox processes.  So my laptop would have been running 27.

The lower you can get your process count, the better!  (OT - my real-world XP only runs 14!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My Vista x64 has almost 100 processes at this moment and runs poorly on an overclocked Pentium E6600 CPU. I need to upgrade this computer to a Quad Q6600, which I also own.

Edited by mjd79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

It's been a long time since I've used Vista but I do recall that the very VERY first thing I did after each and EVERY startup was to go into Task Manager and manually disable two (three?) Task Scheduler processes because I never hunted down a method to disable it permanently.

do you have the list of what you turned off still?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, mjd79 said:

My Vista x64 has almost 100 processes at this moment and runs poorly on an overclocked Pentium E6600 CPU. I need to upgrade this computer to a Quad Q6600, which I also own.

You don't need an upgrade!  You need to knock down "almost 100 processes" by MORE THAN HALF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

You don't need an upgrade!  You need to knock down "almost 100 processes" by MORE THAN HALF.

Actually, you are right. Unfortunately today the cheap and crappy SSD with Vista decided to crash, so I will have to reinstall it on HDD :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2023 at 12:05 AM, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Dug up my ancient Vista VirtualBox VM.

It runs the same config that I ran when I had Vista on one of my laptops (that laptop died and I opted to not bring it back to life due to it only having Vista [was never really a fan of Vista]).

My VM has two Task Scheduler processes that I kill on startup (this also disables "auto defrag" [I hate hate hate auto defrag!]). Here.

My number of processes via Task Manager is 29.  But two of those are VirtualBox processes.  So my laptop would have been running 27.

The lower you can get your process count, the better!  (OT - my real-world XP only runs 14!)

Everything needs to be tested first, disable unnecessary processes! And if that doesn't help, then you need to change the SSD!

Edited by Bella8Corey
Error
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/10/2023 at 7:29 AM, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Disable "transparency".  Axe "aero".

Unless he has a good GPU.  In such a case, the heavy lifting is shifted to the GPU, and not the CPU.

I was using Vista x64 Ultimate on an HP xw8200 (a dual Xeon system, based on Netburst P4),  I had 7 GB of DDR2 RAM in it, and my PCI-e slot was knackered, so I put in a nicely accelerated PCI dadapter.  Aero sang sweetly on that, and I had no issues with Vista.  This was especcailly the case with SP2 built in and the Platform update.

On an XP-era computer?  Sure disabe Aero.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see that you have changed to Windows 7. Good decision, because at the moment even XP x86 is already better than Vista x86 due to the existence of Open Core API.

Edited by mjd79
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...