Gator2001 Posted December 3, 2022 Share Posted December 3, 2022 Hi. Well, I am currently trying to run Google Chrome 48 on Windows me, Using a similar method as Firefox 45. I have not made any progress so far. In fact, from dependency walker I get the following error: Access violation - code c0000005 yIf anyone has any idea how to fix it I'd be grateful :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Draker Posted December 3, 2022 Share Posted December 3, 2022 So no missing dependencies shown ? What was the last working version ? I remember the last one for ME was smth like 41. Don't have an install of ME nearby, sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mina7601 Posted December 3, 2022 Share Posted December 3, 2022 22 minutes ago, D.Draker said: What was the last working version ? I remember the last one for ME was smth like 41. Google Chrome never supported Windows 98/ME. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schwups Posted December 3, 2022 Share Posted December 3, 2022 There is no workaround yet, but who knows what's in a year. I have hardly dealt with Chrome in the last weeks or months. And what about the cryptographic support TLS 1.2/1.3? Google chrome doesn't support it itself. There is a solution for XP (POSReady 2009 updates...), but I don't think there's a simple solution to transfer that to ME. TLS 1.2 is standard today and browsing is almost no longer possible without it. I believe we're not far away to run IE7 or 8. Of course, those IE browsers are very old and obsolete and don't support TLS 1.2, too. I see valid hope for Mypal 68 in the near future. Currently the best and most modern browser I have is Palemoon (31) on the mypal 29.3 "engine" (xul, omni.ja,...). The advantage I've is that this configuration is significantly more stable than Mypal. Errors in Xul usually do not occur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Draker Posted December 3, 2022 Share Posted December 3, 2022 3 hours ago, mina7601 said: Google Chrome never supported Windows 98/ME. Chrome never supported 9x officially, but then again, It's not supported for Vista for almost 8 years, yet we run it. With the pack "Windows ME unofficial service pack" it is very promising . But not with the version he wants, of course ! Unfortunately the link is dead for many years. Someone has it archived ? https://hjtsoft.blogspot.com/2017/10/unofficial-windows-millenium-edition.html Also, he would need KernelEx 4.5.2 and http://blog.livedoor.jp/blackwingcat/archives/360097.html But like I said, only for older versions, I'd suggest to try them first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPerceniol Posted December 3, 2022 Share Posted December 3, 2022 Sadly, my last Laptop (IBM Thinkpad) that Had ME on it finally just died a few years ago and I now have not way to test either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schwups Posted December 3, 2022 Share Posted December 3, 2022 (edited) BWC's Chrometool isn't compatible with Win ME / KernelEx. I think KernelEx would have to be considerably rebuilt to get compatibility. But I'm happy to be taught better. Download links for SP's: IMO service packs will not really help to run Chrome. Edited December 3, 2022 by schwups 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schwups Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 Oh yes, today I remembered loblo's method for Opera. Why shouldn't it work for Chrome to get TLS 1.2/1.3 support: Using Burp Suite Community Edition as an HTTPS proxy for Opera running on Azul OpenJDK 8. https://msfn.org/board/topic/178283-browsing-the-web-on-98me-in-2019-and-beyond/?do=findComment&comment=1184454 and following posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loblo Posted December 9, 2022 Share Posted December 9, 2022 I haven't used Burp in quite a long while, I use 3proxy with SSL plugin instead (not latest version), it's faster but it doesn't have TLS 1.3 support and Cloudflare doesn't like it. I shouldn't be so lazy and make a post/ topic about it as it's a bit involved getting it set up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now