NotHereToPlayGames Posted January 17, 2022 Author Share Posted January 17, 2022 But I really really really prefer my Stylus view. No "face icons". Sorry, just a "pet peeve" of mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted January 17, 2022 Author Share Posted January 17, 2022 1 minute ago, Dave-H said: Unfortunately it seems to be difficult, if not impossible, to see Instagram comments without logging in. Sorry, I don't have an Instagram account. So hopefully somebody else may be able to offer assistance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-H Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 Understood, I hope someone else who does have an account will be able to confirm whether they are seeing the same issue or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted January 17, 2022 Author Share Posted January 17, 2022 Looks like I found something. I found three different Instagram "click here to follow" web pages that only contain a description but all three of those web pages are displaying "squares". I don't have an account so that's all the futher I can get. But all three use a font for emojis called Twemoji Mozilla. Which to me wreaks of a web master that only cares how Firefox renders the emojis, but I digress. Here's a github if interested in compiling Twemoji - https://github.com/twitter/twemoji Other than that, I'm not finding a way to "install" Twemoji on XP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Draker Posted January 17, 2022 Share Posted January 17, 2022 6 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: As far as that "shield" font, it's a font called "FontAwesome". Nope , not working ! As you can see on the screenshot - this font is not blocked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted January 17, 2022 Author Share Posted January 17, 2022 2 minutes ago, D.Draker said: Nope , not working ! As you can see on the screenshot - this font is not blocked. When NoScript, HOSTS file, uMatrix, UBO, you name it, blocks a font, it is still displayed in the .css element. So I still think you have something blocking FontAwesome from being "fetched". What extensions are you using? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted January 17, 2022 Author Share Posted January 17, 2022 Here is where uMatrix logs the incoming FontAwesome - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted January 17, 2022 Author Share Posted January 17, 2022 But the Dev Tools will display as present even when I block the font from being fetched - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Draker Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 I did what you told and I appreciate you're trying to help - still not working , don't bother really . I don't care about them . At least they moved this ugly mole from Dave's chin and placed it above his right ear . I wrote them and asked to do it because it looked really ugly . (like a huge mole) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted January 18, 2022 Author Share Posted January 18, 2022 (edited) lol, too funny. You could always use Stylus to move the "mole". Or use Stylus to not even display the "mole". I actually use Stylus to not only not display the "mole", but to not even display that profile "face" AT ALL. No face for Dave-H. No face for D.Draker. No face for Dixel. No blobfish for whoever used to use a blobfish. etc... Edited January 18, 2022 by NotHereToPlayGames 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPerceniol Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 (edited) What would you all do without (cute little) Mister Blobfish to start off the day. Wait ... please help, there is something that makes Daves glasses look blue. There must be a setting somewhere. Poor Dave ... I feel for ya man. OK ... serious question. https://www.chromium.org/Home/chromium-security/ssca Experimental enabled SharedArrayBuffer support in JavaScript. Enable SharedArrayBuffer support in JavaScript. – Mac, Windows, Linux, Chrome OS, Android #shared-array-buffer This is at its default and undefined (again, don't know what that means). Should this flag be set to disable or enable? I'm trying to research myself. I read this would add protection but could slow things down and I don't want to to do that. I'm hungry for some reason now Edited January 18, 2022 by XPerceniol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted January 18, 2022 Author Share Posted January 18, 2022 Does this help -- https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2021/03/sharedarraybuffer-notes ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XPerceniol Posted January 18, 2022 Share Posted January 18, 2022 (edited) Yeah that is what I was thinking, but wondering because this is Chrome 69 and pretty old considering. Of course, this is XP so no protection on the hardware level, but that isn't my desire anyway as I'm trying to get more speed and updates slow things down. I suspset it would go hand-in-hand with isolation flags that @Sampei was talking about. Do you guys recomend enabling the buffer? I'm not sure what default is. EDIT: Since I've also: WebAssembly threads support. Enables support for the WebAssembly Threads proposal. Implies #shared-array-buffer and #enable-webassembly. – Mac, Windows, Linux, Chrome OS, Android #enable-webassembly-threads Set to disabled (I never use wasm), I'll also roll with that disabled and let you know what Mister Blobfish says. Edited January 18, 2022 by XPerceniol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted January 18, 2022 Author Share Posted January 18, 2022 Spectre was public knowledge in January 2018 and even "grandma" knew what it was by May through July of 2018. Chrome v69 was released in September 2018. Chrome addressed Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities with the release of Chrome v64 in January 2018 -- https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/science-technology/900606/Google-Chrome-update-patch-Meltdown-Spectre-Intel-fix-version-64 Firefox releases also addressed Spectre and Meltdown in January 2018 -- https://support.mozilla.org/bm/questions/1198249 I would keep the 360Chrome v11 (Chrome v69) flag at DEFAULT and not change it at all. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-H Posted January 19, 2022 Share Posted January 19, 2022 9 hours ago, XPerceniol said: Wait ... please help, there is something that makes Daves glasses look blue. There must be a setting somewhere. Poor Dave ... I feel for ya man. My glasses are blue! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts