Jump to content

My Browser Builds (Part 3)


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Taiga-chan said:

facebook will try to facilitate Google Chrome more than UXP.

... Hello? Where have you been? :P ... It's Q4 of 2022 we're into, this isn't any news ...
FWIW, the overwhelming majority of sites, with social media services being the top offenders :realmad: , will favour the latest Google Chrome over the rest browser choices, especially when non-mainstream :angry: ... I bet you UXP is beyond 95% of web developers/admins' radars, they have no intention of (consciously) supporting retro-computing communities that run OSes and browsers major vendors (read M$, Apple, Google) don't endorse...

36 minutes ago, Taiga-chan said:

I'll wait for further fixes.

Who from? Web Compatibility issues in UXP-based browsers are cropping up like weeds as we speak... With WebComponents/CustomElements and Regex Named Capturing Groups (just two off the top of my head ;)) NOT (yet?) implemented (fully) in UXP, more sites will be in need of "further fixes", fixes which'll have to come from "upstream", noone can tell when :dubbio:...

[apologies if I sound a tad "ranty", sadly it's a grip with (current) reality :( ... ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites


9 minutes ago, VistaLover said:

Who from? Web Compatibility issues in UXP-based browsers are cropping up like weeds as we speak... With WebComponents/CustomElements and Regex Named Capturing Groups (just two off the top of my head ;)) NOT (yet?) implemented (fully) in UXP, more sites will be in need of "further fixes", fixes which'll have to come from "upstream", noone can tell when :dubbio:...

[apologies if I sound a tad "ranty", sadly it's a grip with (current) reality :( ... ]

It's true. I'm just waiting. Retro computers.
almost no hope
I know in the end they probably didn't care about it.

Sorry if you misunderstood. The ending was a painful sorrow.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I missed the last release due to an illness and the lack of time...

The mirror of latest BNavigator, Firefox 45ESR, IceApe, IceDove, K-Meleon 1.5.x/74/76, MailNews 52, New Moon 26.5/27/28 and Serpent 52/55 builds by @roytam1 has been updated -> soggi.org - tools.

changelog:
- added latest BNavigator 0.9 20221008 build
- added latest IceApe 52 20221008 build
- added latest IceDove 52 20221008 build
- added latest K-Meleon 76 20221008 build
- added latest MailNews 52 20221008 build
- added latest New Moon 27 20221008 builds
- added latest New Moon 28 20221008 builds
- added latest Serpent 52 20221008 builds
- added latest Serpent 55 20221008 builds

To don't lose track of things I want to update too someday...

todo:
- add various flash player versions
- add FlashFix for WinXP
- add VLC 2.2.8 (WinXP non-SSE2)
- add polyfill addons

kind regards
soggi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, nicolaasjan said:

Inspecting that "Omegaverse" part, it appears to be the Cambria Math font.

So this is actually Cambria Math! I didn't believe WordPad when I pasted it there, when I made the new line and had formatting buttons and font dropdown set the same as with selected text I copied from the website, it looked a little bit different, so I wasn't sure if this is really the correct font.

One source I found yesterday suggested this font initially came with Windows Vista and Office 2007.

6 hours ago, VistaLover said:
7 hours ago, Taiga-chan said:

facebook will try to facilitate Google Chrome more than UXP.

... Hello? Where have you been? :P ... It's Q4 of 2022 we're into, this isn't any news ...
FWIW, the overwhelming majority of sites, with social media services being the top offenders :realmad: , will favour the latest Google Chrome over the rest browser choices, especially when non-mainstream :angry:

You don't say, I remember when you could still chat via Facebook Messenger (normal version of the site) on Pale Moon and it didn't make you wanna start throwing things out the window. :rolleyes:

On my not very latest browser versions, on Firefox it works with a bit of scrollbar twitching while on Edge, it works correctly.


Some websites out there are still reminiscent of the old web, eg. https://www.ross-tech.com/vag-com/VCDS.php. They have written specifically to let them know if you believe their website has an accessibility issue.

In contrast, one Ross-Tech's distributor's website (https://vcds.si/) has a bit more modern design and there's more going on in the background (eg. jQuery). I think it would be decent for the site of such caliber to also pick the language from the browser. Looking at the HTML, it's made with WordPress and I know for certain WP can do that as well.

Above website is compatible with UXP, but WordPress or at least certain plugins these days can in fact serve UXP incompatible scripts. Which is a problem because such platforms have their appeal for taking away technical details when it comes to working with websites and such incompatibilities may, given some time, manifest on multiple websites.

4 hours ago, soggi said:

Sorry, I missed the last release due to an illness and the lack of time...

You too? I still cough occasionally after 1,5 week from the point when I seemed to be fine at first glance, it's really taking a lot of time to clear up.

Edited by UCyborg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2022 at 11:59 PM, UCyborg said:

One source I found yesterday suggested this font initially came with Windows Vista and Office 2007.

Was your source this?

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/font-list/cambria-math

(BTW, it would appear that "docs.microsoft.com" has now become "learn.microsoft.com", breaking some static filters of mine in UBO :angry: )

That page confounds most of my arguments in my previous post, i.e. in Serpent 52.9.0:

1. It displays a huge header saying:

Quote

This browser is no longer supported.

Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.

Download Microsoft Edge | More info about Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge

I took care ;) of that in uBO:

! https://learn.microsoft.com
learn.microsoft.com###unsupported-browser

2. While most of the page's content displays, Web Console warns of:

TypeError: window.customElements is undefined[Learn More]                                 7743e1e8.index-docs.js:1:14604
  <anonymous> https://learn.microsoft.com/_themes/docs.theme/master/en-us/_themes/scripts/7743e1e8.index-docs.js:1:14604
  <anonymous> https://learn.microsoft.com/_themes/docs.theme/master/en-us/_themes/scripts/7743e1e8.index-docs.js:1:14

And that was only a "simple", knowledge-base, page... :realmad:

Edited by VistaLover
Modified uBO's cosmetic filter rule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, VistaLover said:

2. While most of the page's content displays, Web Console warns of:

TypeError: window.customElements is undefined[Learn More]                                 7743e1e8.index-docs.js:1:14604
  <anonymous> https://learn.microsoft.com/_themes/docs.theme/master/en-us/_themes/scripts/7743e1e8.index-docs.js:1:14604
  <anonymous> https://learn.microsoft.com/_themes/docs.theme/master/en-us/_themes/scripts/7743e1e8.index-docs.j

Palefill already had a "built-in rule" for "docs.microsoft.com", now that MS changed the hostname to "learn.microsoft.com", that rule has to be corrected accordingly; inside file "./lib/builtin-rules.js" (L56)

-docs.microsoft.com  
+learn.microsoft.com
    std-customElements
! --

Now the MS page should display as intended :) :

SyMEO67.jpg

BTW, if you're wondering why the page displays in its dark "flavour" (by default), it's because I have set:

browser.display.prefers_color_scheme;2

inside my Serpent's config editor (about:config) :P ...

Edited by VistaLover
changed screengrab, added clarification
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, UCyborg said:

So this is actually Cambria Math! I didn't believe WordPad when I pasted it there, when I made the new line and had formatting buttons and font dropdown set the same as with selected text I copied from the website, it looked a little bit different, so I wasn't sure if this is really the correct font.

One source I found yesterday suggested this font initially came with Windows Vista and Office 2007.

What I'm confused about, is that I didn't see it when inspecting in Pale Moon.

F12 in Firefox showed it.

How can this be explained?

Anyhow, whoever is missing Cambria, can download them from my Dropbox account (these are the most recent version from a Windows 10 install).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, VistaLover said:

they have no intention of (consciously) supporting retro-computing communities

I run XP on all NINE of my computers/laptops.  But I do not classify this as "retro-computing".

Retro-computing is Commodore C64 or VIC-20, Apple IIe, Tandy 100, et cetera.  Not XP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrocomputing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, VistaLover said:

Was your source this?

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/typography/font-list/cambria-math

(BTW, it would appear that "docs.microsoft.com" has now become "learn.microsoft.com", breaking some static filters of mine in UBO :angry: )

That page confounds most of my arguments in my previous post, i.e. in Serpent 52.9.0:

1. It displays a huge header saying:

Quote

This browser is no longer supported.

Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.

Download Microsoft Edge | More info about Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge

I took care ;) of that in UBO:

! https://learn.microsoft.com
learn.microsoft.com##.has-default-focus.header-holder

@VistaLover Thanks for this tip and your filter! Microsoft is always coming up with something new. fluch.gif 
Anyway, it works like a charme. It only remains to mention that the option cosmetic filters in uBO must of course be activated, which unfortunately was not the case with me, and therefore did not work at first.

12 hours ago, VistaLover said:

Palefill already had a "built-in rule" for "docs.microsoft.com", now that MS changed the hostname to "learn.microsoft.com", that rule has to be corrected accordingly; inside file "./lib/builtin-rules.js" (L56)

-docs.microsoft.com  
+learn.microsoft.com
    std-customElements
! --

Now the MS page should display as intended :) :

 

A second thanks for the tip to modify the file builtin-rules.js in palefill! All is working fine now. goodjob.gif

Kindest regards, AstroSkipper ecrire-ordi.gif

Edited by AstroSkipper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Retro-computing is Commodore C64 or VIC-20, Apple IIe, Tandy 100, et cetera.  Not XP.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrocomputing

Thanks for that link ;) ... Let's just accept that for "now", WinXP isn't "retro", just "obsolete" :P:

https://dfarq.homeip.net/is-windows-xp-obsolete-or-is-it-retro/

... But it'll have become "retro" sooner than you and I would think (late 2020s, early 2030s? :dubbio::whistle:); whatever the adjective used to "correctly" refer to it, "facebook" and their "pals" would still not consider it (and the browsers running on it) as a platform to officially support/test on...
 FWIW, let it be put on record that I personally hold nothing against WinXP; but in the majority of the cases I would post (especially in GitHub issue trackers) and complain that XP support had been removed from an app (often taking Vista support with it :realmad: ), "they" were quick to point to me that "XP was first released to the public in late 2001"... :(

Later edit: I believe

https://w2k.phreaknet.org/

is a project run by one of MSFN members... "Retrocomputing" is the first term on the header; I see many references to XP therein, so perhaps it was from there I had formed a more "loose" comprehension of the "term" (to also comprise XP ;) ) ...

Edited by VistaLover
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AstroSkipper said:

It only remains to mention that the option cosmetic filters in uBO must of course be activated,
which unfortunately was not the case with me, and therefore did not work at first.

... As far as I am aware, the default setting in uBO is to have "cosmetic filtering" always enabled ("activated"), both in a global scope:

uaT5G03.jpg

as well as "on a per site" scope:

7AW6Tnd.jpg

Relevant reading material here ;) ...

So I take it, by what you posted, that you had disabled CF yourself sometime in the past... Am I correct in this assumption?

Kind regards :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...