modnar Posted September 17, 2022 Share Posted September 17, 2022 Mighty fine, mighty fine! Serpent 52.9 sits this one out... I chose Serpent as my replacement for Mozilla Fireferret 52.9 because it scored the highest on http://html5test.com and still does 481 out of 555, KMGoanna does 439 same as New Moon. Am I correct in such classification? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soggi Posted September 17, 2022 Share Posted September 17, 2022 The mirror of latest BNavigator, Firefox 45ESR, IceApe, IceDove, K-Meleon 1.5.x/74/76, MailNews 52, New Moon 26.5/27/28 and Serpent 52/55 builds by @roytam1 has been updated -> soggi.org - tools. changelog: - added latest K-Meleon 76 20220917 build - added latest New Moon 27 20220917 builds To don't lose track of things I want to update too someday... todo: - add various flash player versions - add FlashFix for WinXP - add VLC 2.2.8 (WinXP non-SSE2) - add polyfill addons kind regards soggi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grey_rat Posted September 17, 2022 Share Posted September 17, 2022 roytam1, thanks for 1024 textures https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/unvpviw3ro08k4i/r9550ha.JPG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathwiz Posted September 18, 2022 Share Posted September 18, 2022 On 9/16/2022 at 10:45 AM, roytam1 said: regexp group problem is not the thing that palefill can fix: 23:43:40.376 SyntaxError: invalid regexp group 1 common.a7451d66741fd9fd.js:1:307 This (regexp groups) is becoming an issue on more and more web sites. Question for those who frequent the upstream forums: Has there been any progress on dealing with this, or is it a "toughie" like Web Components seems to be? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicolaasjan Posted September 18, 2022 Share Posted September 18, 2022 (edited) 15 hours ago, Mathwiz said: Question for those who frequent the upstream forums: Has there been any progress on dealing with this, or is it a "toughie" like Web Components seems to be? https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=28800&p=231804&hilit=invalid+regexp#p231804 No progress at all, it seems... Edited September 18, 2022 by nicolaasjan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCyborg Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 On 9/18/2022 at 4:05 AM, Mathwiz said: This (regexp groups) is becoming an issue on more and more web sites. Vanilla Pale Moon user here, also feeling impracticality due to those. Can't use Google Drive, can't use Nextcloud, couldn't even buy a vignette on evinjeta.dars.si (toll payment method to use motorways over here). My stopgap (Win7+ only) solution with close to classic GUI (with CTR addon) is Waterfox Classic, but it's also slowly becoming obsolete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VistaLover Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 5 hours ago, UCyborg said: Vanilla Pale Moon user here, also feeling impracticality due to those. Can't use Google Drive https://github.com/martok/palefill/commit/a99ffed200859f4c41fe744c7462452ccf24d23c 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCyborg Posted September 19, 2022 Share Posted September 19, 2022 @VistaLover Oh, cool, thanks, I haven't been keeping up. Too much baggage in real life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VistaLover Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 On 9/18/2022 at 5:05 AM, Mathwiz said: Has there been any progress on dealing with this, or is it a "toughie" like Web Components seems to be? ... In addition to the Pale Moon forum thread linked to by @nicolaasjan , pertaining to Regex Named Capturing Groups, UXP is also plagued by lack of support for another Regex "feature" I "spoke" about in my Aug 29th post: On 8/29/2022 at 6:33 PM, VistaLover said: On 8/29/2022 at 9:50 AM, taos said: Hopefully it's something minor Sadly, it's not; as your posted Error Console Log says, this is due to missing Regex Unicode Property Escapes support in UXP ; upstream have open issues for it at: https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1282 (=> https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1286 [closed, unresolved] =>) https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1675 but they have seen little action as of late... So, as you see, complete SNAFU in the RegExp "front"... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClassicNick Posted September 20, 2022 Share Posted September 20, 2022 @roytam1 I noticed on GitHub you have a repository named "gecko27-vc8". Did you have any success building it yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roytam1 Posted September 20, 2022 Author Share Posted September 20, 2022 (edited) 4 hours ago, ClassicNick said: @roytam1 I noticed on GitHub you have a repository named "gecko27-vc8". Did you have any success building it yet? sure, I can build a VC8 build on that repo. Backstory: http://tboard.starfree.jp/forums/topic/6/#post-758 Edited September 20, 2022 by roytam1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reino Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 On 9/19/2022 at 4:06 PM, VistaLover said: https://github.com/martok/palefill/commit/a99ffed200859f4c41fe744c7462452ccf24d23c I'm still using github-wc-polyfill-1.2.19.xpi, but seeing there's a lot more activity around palefill, would it be wise to use this instead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroSkipper Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 2 hours ago, Reino said: I'm still using github-wc-polyfill-1.2.19.xpi, but seeing there's a lot more activity around palefill, would it be wise to use this instead? I used github-wc-polyfill for a longer time. Unfortunately, there wasn't any activity since April. Therefore, I changed completely to palefill a few months ago. And, I am totally happy with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roytam1 Posted September 21, 2022 Author Share Posted September 21, 2022 7 hours ago, Reino said: I'm still using github-wc-polyfill-1.2.19.xpi, but seeing there's a lot more activity around palefill, would it be wise to use this instead? if you use github/gitlab only, github-wc-polyfill is faster as it doesn't calculate script hash everytime. latest version is here: https://github.com/JustOff/github-wc-polyfill/issues/68#issuecomment-1250325691 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VistaLover Posted September 22, 2022 Share Posted September 22, 2022 On 9/5/2022 at 3:50 AM, Mathwiz said: Micro$oft must require its GitHub developers to shoehorn in at least one use of every newly-announced Javascript feature, so that something on GitHub will break every time Google thinks up anything new! Luckily, downloading new releases still works (for now). ... As it turns out, your "friends" over at Microsoft must be really liking your posts and the "new ideas" presented to them (just joking, of course! ) ... So they thought: Matt did mention that "downloading new releases still works (for now)", so let's just scratch that! () Hence: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=70&t=28849 (do click, it's safe ) which, in turn, necessitated https://github.com/martok/palefill/issues/47 and https://github.com/martok/palefill/commit/3a480ab TL;DR: Assets (under Releases) have been hidden behind a WebComponents-requiring "wizard", thus fresh installs of UXP-based browsers are unable to access, among anything else released in GitHub, the very one (two, if you count gh-wc-pf) extension that would make them GitHub compatible ... Fortunately, workarounds are available... 47 minutes ago, roytam1 said: latest version is here: https://github.com/JustOff/github-wc-polyfill/issues/68#issuecomment-1250325691 In retrospect, that was a smart thing to do! Comment attachments are accessible by UXP-based browsers without palefill or gh-wc-pf... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts