Jump to content

[Cancelled by the Author] Extended Kernel for XP (ExtendedXP)


Dibya

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Dibya said:

That's for few android drivers around.  I am talking about intel hd gfx

isn't intel graphics a kernel mode driver?

intel graphics kernel mode driver

igdkmd64.sys

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Just now, roytam1 said:

instead, I want new palemoon compiled for vanilla XP. :P

Well!  Your wish will be fulfilled.  I will make both x86 and x64

Just now, Damnation said:

isn't intel graphics a kernel mode driver?

intel graphics kernel mode driver

igdkmd64.sys

But it has no dependency for kmdf .

Your mentioned sys file seems to  be x64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dibya said:

Well!  Your wish will be fulfilled.  I will make both x86 and x64

But it has no dependency for kmdf .

Your mentioned sys file seems to  be x64

I'm looking forward to your binaries :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/23/2017 at 6:39 PM, Dibya said:

That's for few android drivers around.  I am talking about intel hd gfx

Anyone want Palemoon/Seamonkey/KemeLeon compiled for xp x64?  

i suppose palemoon x64 for xp would be good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys and gals , I have compiled a early version of 9x kernelex for xp with help of priothn and Damnation but It breaks kernel32.dll when it patches in disk but does not effect other binaries  . Any one here having skills can check what breaking binary aka dll files?

Here is source code http://www.mediafire.com/file/96cw6qen6dn6yr5/EXTENDEDKERNEL_SRC+CODE.7z

It requires Visual C++ 6.0 or Mingw to compile(TDM GCC recommended )

I am going for now i will get back to the project after July 11th .

If some one can fix kex engine it will be great else i have  to patch manually .

Edited by Dibya
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dibya said:

Hi guys and gals , I have compiled a early version of 9x kernelex for xp with help of priothn and Damnation but It breaks kernel32.dll when it patches in disk but does not effect other binaries  . Any one here having skills can check what breaking binary aka dll files?

Here is source code http://www.mediafire.com/file/96cw6qen6dn6yr5/EXTENDEDKERNEL_SRC+CODE.7z

It requires Visual C++ 6.0 or Mingw to compile(TDM GCC recommended )

I am going for now i will get back to the project after July 11th .

If some one can fix kex engine it will be great else i have  to patch manually .

Wow, that's wonderful... If it will work, can I use it even for my project on windows nt 4.0? When I come back from holiday, I will try it.

Edited by junior600
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, junior600 said:

Wow, that's wonderful... If it will work, can I use it even for my project on windows nt 4.0? When I come back from holiday, I will try it.

Have to fix bugs on xp please . It has some extremely stable nt6.x api implementation.  Yes you can use it I already said I will make it open soarce. 

Edited by Dibya
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dibya said:

Have to fix bugs on xp please . It has some extremely stable nt6.x api implementation.  Yes you can use it I already said I will make it open soarce. 

Well, I also found that even the user piotrhn is working on a nt 4.0 compatibility layer using kex 3.5... I sent him my compiled dlls, maybe he will be able to get firefox 3.5 load :)

Edited by junior600
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, junior600 said:

Well, I also found that even the user piotrhn is working on a nt 4.0 compatibility layer using kex 3.5... I sent him my compiled dlls, maybe he will be able to get firefox 3.5 load :)

It will make my granny happy.

Well I cannot find why kernelex is breaking kernel32 dll only . Its time to wait and see what happens.  

Edited by Dibya
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am aware of that , it  keep working if we can fix it . Later version of kernelex patch in memory that may be adopted but I failed year ago . I have compiled the kernelex4.5.2 patch driver into sys rather vxd for xp but it never worked. XP is not 9x so it cannot run vxd .

Edit: more over kernelex create export table after relocation and resources table that crashes certain application also slows down system slightly.  It is needed to impliment such mechanism so that export table created before relocation and resources table . Wildbills petool can do it but we have no src code so far . We need such mechanism to implement.  PE file for stability non relocated code section  should lie after relocated section but opposite happening with kernelex.  May be it is not vital for 9x but for NT it is surely needed .

Edited by Dibya
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Dibya said:

I am aware of that , it  keep working if we can fix it . Later version of kernelex patch in memory that may be adopted but I failed year ago . I have compiled the kernelex4.5.2 patch driver into sys rather vxd for xp but it never worked. XP is not 9x so it cannot run vxd .

Edit: more over kernelex create export table after relocation and resources table that crashes certain application also slows down system slightly.  It is needed to impliment such mechanism so that export table created before relocation and resources table . Wildbills petool can do it but we have no src code so far . We need such mechanism to implement.  PE file for stability non relocated code section  should lie after relocated section but opposite happening with kernelex.  May be it is not vital for 9x but for NT it is surely needed .

how did you notice it was creating the export table after the relocation and resources table? what tool did you use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Damnation said:

how did you notice it was creating the export table after the relocation and resources table? what tool did you use?

See with Cff explorer it is creating export table after rsc section.  If it do next bit up first optimization then fine other wise not . I do not know whether it do so

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...