roytam1 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 4 hours ago, dencorso said: Or not... It seems 2k is immune to WannaCry... read this... nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibya Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 2k/XP/2k3 it self is immune . WannaCry virus sub system ver of PE is 6.1 also it need NTFS transaction api to work which does not exists in any Nt 5.x system . The virus will not work so no screenshot of infected XP exists in web . <Offer against the rules removed> SMB 1 vulnerability fully cannot effect Nt 5.x donot believe me compare 7 and XP patch under IDA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roytam1 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 2 hours ago, Dibya said: 2k/XP/2k3 it self is immune . WannaCry virus sub system ver of PE is 6.1 also it need NTFS transaction api to work which does not exists in any Nt 5.x system . The virus will not work so no screenshot of infected XP exists in web . <Offer against the rules removed> SMB 1 vulnerability fully cannot effect Nt 5.x donot believe me compare 7 and XP patch under IDA Wine has no NTFS related API but it still runs and encrypts files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibya Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 (edited) 12 hours ago, roytam1 said: Wine has no NTFS related API but it still runs and encrypts files. It seems to be highly developed virus . I am talking about transaction api of ntdll. Stubs for those do exist in wine Edited May 17, 2017 by Dibya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jody Thornton Posted May 17, 2017 Author Share Posted May 17, 2017 So if I were running XP or Windows 2000 on a FAT32 partition (which I actually did back in the day), are you saying I'd be immune to Wanna cry(pt)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibya Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, JodyT said: So if I were running XP or Windows 2000 on a FAT32 partition (which I actually did back in the day), are you saying I'd be immune to Wanna cry(pt)? Nope I am talking about nt6.x api of ntdll that do NTFS transaction EDIT : NtCommitTransaction this is the api needed by WannaCry v 2.0 but WannaCry v 1.0 can infect even nt 4.0 so be aware . Edited May 17, 2017 by Dibya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sdfox7 Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 I'd love to know why this KB4012598 update hasn't been pushed out to Automatic Updates. It seems like that would be a good idea given the scale of the infections. Back in May 2014, you will recall KB2964358 was pushed out via Automatic Updates, to patch the zero-day exploit on Internet Explorer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heinoganda Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 This question can only be answered by Microsoft. The patch for Windows XP is only available in the download center and in the WSUS catalog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripredacus Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 It indicates that there is a fair amount of private contracts with companies that are still paying for extended support on XP. More-so than to make patches specifically available to those companies and it would be easier to make it available on the enterprise level of update support, the WSUS catalog and the MS Catalog update site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranceBB Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 (edited) Speaking of which, Avast reported 201,138 blocked Wannacrypt infections in 112 countries. That's pretty impressive. Edit: 20/05/2017 It escalated quickly to over 250,000. It just doesn't seem to stop. Edited May 20, 2017 by FranceBB Updating data 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 ............So! XP wasn't to blame after all............. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/over-98-percent-of-all-wannacry-victims-were-using-windows-7/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibya Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 (edited) 12 hours ago, Sampei.Nihira said: ............So! XP wasn't to blame after all............. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/over-98-percent-of-all-wannacry-victims-were-using-windows-7/ XP is not compatible with wannacry Please guys and gals put this words everywhere like forums , facebook , youtuhe etc Please protect XP from death Edited May 20, 2017 by Dibya Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jody Thornton Posted May 20, 2017 Author Share Posted May 20, 2017 I was about to link to this. It appears that a few of us need to line up face against the wall and prepare for a lashing. Please whip gently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 1 hour ago, JodyT said: I was about to link to this. It appears that a few of us need to line up face against the wall and prepare for a lashing. Please whip gently Nahh, I would find this more appropriate : http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079470/quotes?item=qt0471984 Now, seriously (and ironically ), on XP (IF the Wannacry thingy actually encrypted the files) you still have a teeny-tiny possibility to unencrypt them, something that there is NO chance you can do on Windows 10 (again IF the Wannacry thingy ran on it) thanks to the betterings the good MS guys implemented: https://github.com/aguinet/wannakey ..and on 7, at least 32-bit version: https://github.com/gentilkiwi/wanakiwi https://blog.comae.io/wannacry-decrypting-files-with-wanakiwi-demo-86bafb81112d jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jody Thornton Posted May 20, 2017 Author Share Posted May 20, 2017 You "nailed" it on all counts jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now