NojusK Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 2 hours ago, Dibya said: Sumatra PDF 3.3 Ported by Barcode http://www.filedropper.com/testpdf2 Just to make things easier, I created an installer for it http://nojus.trexion.com/local/tmp/SumatraPDF_3.3XP.exe 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dibya Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 Anyone want latest Audacity ? I compiled from source Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 4 hours ago, Dibya said: Sumatra PDF 3.3 Ported by Barcode http://www.filedropper.com/testpdf2 Th, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainyShadow Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 5 hours ago, Dibya said: Sumatra PDF 3.3 Ported by Barcode http://www.filedropper.com/testpdf2 It crashes here, seems to need SSE2 or whatever... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NojusK Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 1 hour ago, Dibya said: Anyone want latest Audacity ? I compiled from source Actually, not much needs to be done to get it running: https://nojus.trexion.com/local/projects/AudacityXP_setup.exe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainyShadow Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 7 minutes ago, Nojus2001 said: Actually, not much needs to be done to get it running: https://nojus.trexion.com/local/projects/AudacityXP_setup.exe Same as the SumatraPDF port - exception c000001d Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NojusK Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 35 minutes ago, RainyShadow said: Same as the SumatraPDF port - exception c000001d It appears Both SumatraPDF & Audacity don't like non-SSE2 processors.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RainyShadow Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 22 minutes ago, Nojus2001 said: It appears Both SumatraPDF & Audacity don't like non-SSE2 processors.. SumatraPDF v.3.0 works fine here, as does Audacity v.2.0.3 The building guide for Audacity suggests MSVC 2017, didn't that come with a default setting to enforce SSE2 optimisation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranceBB Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 6 hours ago, Dibya said: Anyone want latest Audacity ? I compiled from source Well, just update it here, I'll include it in my first post: https://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?t=175829 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerwin Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 On 6/30/2020 at 1:11 PM, Dibya said: Sumatra PDF 3.3 Ported by Barcode http://www.filedropper.com/testpdf2 On my Windows XP SP3 Posready system: this v3.3 cannot show the toolbar + the document tabs are all white and show no document title? v3.1.2 works fine for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 (edited) Out uBlock Origin Legacy v.1.16.4.22 (July 4, 2020): https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/releases/tag/firefox-legacy-1.16.4.22 Edited July 4, 2020 by Sampei.Nihira 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VistaLover Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 36 minutes ago, Sampei.Nihira said: Out uBlock Origin Legacy v.1.16.4.22 (July 4, 2020) ... which, sadly, removes support for Pale Moon 27 based forks, like @roytam1's New Moon 27.x.x (whose sse builds are very popular with our members running pre-SSE2 CPUs): https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/pull/239#issuecomment-651090892 https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/blob/3524cbc34b30d9555eb7e9089aa4a5ea91465741/platform/firefox/install.rdf#L47-L54 https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/commit/990daae 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 (edited) 20 minutes ago, VistaLover said: ... which, sadly, removes support for Pale Moon 27 based forks, like @roytam1's New Moon 27.x.x (whose sse builds are very popular with our members running pre-SSE2 CPUs): https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/pull/239#issuecomment-651090892 https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/blob/3524cbc34b30d9555eb7e9089aa4a5ea91465741/platform/firefox/install.rdf#L47-L54 https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/commit/990daae MSFN members who use these versions of the Roytam1 browsers can also use AdBlock Latitude which is compatible with version 27: https://addons.palemoon.org/addon/adblock-latitude/ Edited July 4, 2020 by Sampei.Nihira 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VistaLover Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 1 hour ago, Sampei.Nihira said: can also use AdBlock Latitude which is compatible with version 27 ... That's good to know... I have not ever been myself a user of ABL or other members of the AB family of content blockers, last thing I remember reading was how much more resource-greedy they were compared to uB0 (and RAM/CPU consumption should always be a consideration on those old hardware setups where NM27-sse is being deployed...). Resources-usage aside, the crux of the matter here is the following question: Does current ABL address successfully the very issues/reasons that forced uB0 to drop PM27 support? As detailed in the previously linked GitHub PR comment, uB0-legacy now needs ES6 support in the browser itself to tackle the removal of certain classes of unwanted content ; does ABL handle such content in a different way? If not, then existing users of uB0-legacy 1.16.4.21 in NM27 should probably stay put at that version (sadly no longer updating ) and face some random/occasional breakage in their ad-removal... It'd be like Chrome 49 users on XP/Vista, who are now confined in using uB0 v1.16.18 for good... Unless something new crops up? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted July 5, 2020 Share Posted July 5, 2020 On 7/4/2020 at 8:25 PM, VistaLover said: ... That's good to know... I have not ever been myself a user of ABL or other members of the AB family of content blockers, last thing I remember reading was how much more resource-greedy they were compared to uB0 (and RAM/CPU consumption should always be a consideration on those old hardware setups where NM27-sse is being deployed...). Resources-usage aside, the crux of the matter here is the following question: Does current ABL address successfully the very issues/reasons that forced uB0 to drop PM27 support? As detailed in the previously linked GitHub PR comment, uB0-legacy now needs ES6 support in the browser itself to tackle the removal of certain classes of unwanted content ; does ABL handle such content in a different way? If not, then existing users of uB0-legacy 1.16.4.21 in NM27 should probably stay put at that version (sadly no longer updating ) and face some random/occasional breakage in their ad-removal... It'd be like Chrome 49 users on XP/Vista, who are now confined in using uB0 v1.16.18 for good... Unless something new crops up? Duplicate cosmetic filters are a problem. UBO cannot always efficiently analyze 2 differently written cosmetic filter rules. All of this causes performance decreases. The ideal would be to have few cosmetic filters, which are necessary, however, compared to the network filters. As I have written elsewhere, malwares lists and predefined multipurpose lists are also inefficient. Better to insert some personalized lists. I insert my final UBO filters list in the dedicated 3D. MSFN members who want to try Adblock Latitude could take my lists as an example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now