TELVM Posted July 5, 2014 Share Posted July 5, 2014 I'm so sorry but I'm not impressed. In the real world it will be tough to notice any difference between these two: The MX100 however is just ~$450/TB against ~$730/TB for the 850 Pro, and comes with a troop of safety tantalum caps. And SATA III does cap the seq speeds, but not the 4K random (thus far). Notice the 4K random QD1 writing speeds well above 100 MB/s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoelC Posted July 5, 2014 Author Share Posted July 5, 2014 Those 4K writing speeds are simply bogus because they're cached by RAM in the system. You need to research how Intel RST works. -Noel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoelC Posted July 5, 2014 Author Share Posted July 5, 2014 If you don't like the term "bogus", call them "skewed" then. I do actually know what I'm talking about. -Noel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TELVM Posted September 22, 2014 Share Posted September 22, 2014 Allow me resurrecting this thread to comment on this recently uncovered issue. Anandtech - Samsung Acknowledges the SSD 840 EVO Read Performance Bug Samsung 840 / 840 EVO susceptible to flash read speed degradation over time ^ x-axis is weeks since file was last written, y-axis is seq read speed in MB/s. Notice how read speed drops as time passes by. Only the plain 840 and the 840 EVO seem to be affected (not the 840 Pro, nor other brands of SSD). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now