jaclaz Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 but you misspelled "boobs" and typed "noobs", instead.Actually I consider them boons (the boobs, not the noobs).jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryb123456 Posted March 20, 2014 Share Posted March 20, 2014 (edited) but you misspelled "boobs" and typed "noobs", instead.Actually I consider them boons (the boobs, not the noobs).jaclazMe too, jaclaz....me like 'em even more than bon bons,but i'm *still* a bon-bon-Hong-Kong-ding-dong-King-Kong-ping-pong-golden-gong-long-gone-lone-loon-good-goon-oboe-ogling-egg-nogg-drinkin'-thinkin'-stinkin'-blinkin'-plinkin'-blinkin'(2)-twinklin'-twiddlin'-piddlin'-fiddlin'-freaky-geeky-squeaky boondoggling aficionado of all them particular things -- individually, and collectively.Since you be talkin' bout boons,i sure hope you don't start rambling bout African and Arabian Old World monkeys belonging to the genus Papio, part of the subfamily Cercopithecinae baboons: Edited March 20, 2014 by larryb123456 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryb123456 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 Important announcementPlease ignore this comment that I made in my last post:but i'm *still* a bon-bon-Hong-Kong-ding-dong-King-Kong-ping-pong-golden-gong-long-gone-lone-loon-good-goon-oboe-ogling-egg-nogg-drinkin'-thinkin'-stinkin'-blinkin'-plinkin'-blinkin'(2)-twinklin'-twiddlin'-piddlin'-fiddlin'-freaky-geeky-squeaky boondoggling aficionado of all them particular things -- individually, and collectively.for 2 reasons:#1 -- that be *too ignorant* -- even by my own standards#2 -- and most importantly, it diminishes the intellectual purity of SpaceCowboy111213141516's post about his sigsIn fact, please disregard EVERYTHING in my last post, except for the *only thing* that made some sense: Thanks for your attention regarding this important matter,Larry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryb123456 Posted April 1, 2014 Share Posted April 1, 2014 (edited) @LostInSpace2014:I like your new signature, shown athttp://www.msfn.org/board/topic/171300-lost-in-spaces-sigs/?p=1071984which depicts former US president Dick Milhous Nixon, on the right, bursting into flames on the day he had to resign his presidency, because he was caught robbing a Wells FargoTM truck.But what I truly love is your new avatar -- (also shown in the above link) -- which is clearly a picture of Samuel L. Jackson playing the character of Jules Winnfield in the 1994 American movie, "Pulp Fiction", directed by Quentin Tarantino, and starring Marilyn Monroe, Andy Warhol, and Pee Wee Herman.just acutely observing and accurately commenting,Larry Edited April 1, 2014 by larryb123456 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZortMcGort11 Posted April 2, 2014 Author Share Posted April 2, 2014 Okay... LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryb123456 Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 (edited) Hello, LostInSpace2012:Be sure to see my post athttp://www.msfn.org/board/topic/152748-custom-avatars-and-signatures/?p=1074666I made an avatar and signature for your consideration.Larry Edited April 12, 2014 by larryb123456 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryb123456 Posted April 13, 2014 Share Posted April 13, 2014 Hello, LostInSpace2012:Please see http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/152748-custom-avatars-and-signatures/page-24#entry1074743LarryP.S. I love your Pee Wee Herman impression. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryb123456 Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 (edited) Howdy, LostInSpace2012: http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/152748-custom-avatars-and-signatures/?p=1077254 (for your consideration) Larry Edited May 8, 2014 by larryb123456 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryb123456 Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 I made 2 revised versions to the above link. This version is my favorite: http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/152748-custom-avatars-and-signatures/?p=1077275 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZortMcGort11 Posted May 8, 2014 Author Share Posted May 8, 2014 Thanks, Larry! They're great!! LOL :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryb123456 Posted May 9, 2014 Share Posted May 9, 2014 (edited) I did a little more work on your signature and it be posted here, in my thread:http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/152748-custom-avatars-and-signatures/?p=1077394 I think that'll be my last version.(I think, therefore I ama figment of your imagination.) But you might (?) want me to add an image of Monica Lewinsky kissing Bill Clinton.Just let me know if you want to add that.I really hope you don't choose to add that,cause that be a lot of work to do,even for a genius retard, such as myself. Larry Edited May 9, 2014 by larryb123456 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted May 9, 2014 Share Posted May 9, 2014 But you might (?) want me to add an image of Monica Lewinsky kissing Bill Clinton.I guess there might be an issue with WHERE EXACTLY Monica will be kissing Bill in the image. jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryb123456 Posted May 9, 2014 Share Posted May 9, 2014 (edited) WOW, jaclaz, You are *ALWAYS* right on target with your responses !!! Yes, Monica kissed Clinton, many, many times EXACTLY in/on the/his image,and that's why the Republicans tried to get him impeached. Edited May 9, 2014 by larryb123456 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted May 9, 2014 Share Posted May 9, 2014 Well, IMHO it's a good thing that they were, "many, many", as those "kisses" had the highest cost ever seen, in total around US$ 70 million (and the actual taxpayers paid the bill for Bill ). Wait, the good US taxpayers also got a lousy report :http://www.salon.com/2002/03/13/ray_3/The Baltimore Sun was one of the few major newspapers to use Ray’s report as an occasion to call the OIC investigation what it was: a $70 million boondoggle and political witch hunt. As a Sun editorial noted, the money spent on the Starr-Ray investigation would have hired 1,400 teachers for a year, sent 120,000 tons of food to Afghanistan, or provided early intervention for 24,000 young disabled children. Or as American taxpayers might put it, the OIC spent $70 million, and all we got was this lousy report. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CDOC-105hdoc311/content-detail.html jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryb123456 Posted May 9, 2014 Share Posted May 9, 2014 (edited) Thanks for your investigative quote, jaclaz.That *really*, *really* puts the money waste in its *proper* perspective.Big time! Well, I called Bill and showed him your quote, and asked him what he thought of the $70 million waste, and he said:"Duh, well, duh, duh, well, well,maybe so, but I had $90 million worth of funfoolin' around with Monica." I mean, Monica *does have* very pretty, pouty lips for the kissin', IMO. Edited May 9, 2014 by larryb123456 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now