Jump to content

First Contagious WiFi Computer Virus Goes Airborne


Monroe

Recommended Posts

  • 6 months later...

Huge bump, I know :yes:, but happened by pure chance (thanks to Marc Abrahams  and Sally Shelton):

http://www.improbable.com/2014/06/08/an-academic-squint-at-mermaids/

to find a nice explanation about mermaids, how they possibly existed but probably became extinct in recent times, direct link to the .pdf of the article by Prof. Karl Banse:

http://www.aslo.org/lo/toc/vol_35/issue_1/0148.pdf

published in 1990 on the journal Limnology and Oceanography.

 

jaclaz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well ... fool me once, fool me twice, fool me six times or however that little verse goes !!!

 

The picture in the article reminds me of something I once saw at a traveling carnival ... I paid my dollar to see something described as "not from this world" ... the carnival barker had the last laugh as usual when I and the other people came out the side exit of the tent !!!

 

Pretty much the same thing I got from the Discovery Channel in reference to the Mermaid broadcast ... I just didn't have to walk into a tent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well ... fool me once, fool me twice, fool me six times or however that little verse goes !!!

 

The picture in the article reminds me of something I once saw at a traveling carnival ... I paid my dollar to see something described as "not from this world" ... the carnival barker had the last laugh as usual when I and the other people came out the side exit of the tent !!!

 

Pretty much the same thing I got from the Discovery Channel in reference to the Mermaid broadcast ... I just didn't have to walk into a tent.

 

Yep, the not-so-slight difference is the source, I would guess that should be a different level of reliability attributed to a carnival barker (or to a tv show producer) and to a reknown University Professor.

 

Of course academic people are reknown for their jokes :yes:, and from time to time it is fun to go through the editor and "peers" review and get an "absurd" paper actually published by , but usually when this happens the joke is publicly exposed soon after, in this case this one went seemingly unnoticed.... :unsure:

 

A couple fun (or sad) reports on scientific papers and the level of some conferences/publications:

http://smritiweb.com/navin/education-2/how-i-published-a-fake-paper-and-why-it-is-the-fault-of-our-education-system

http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6154/60.full

a bit extreme, but I believe that these are the point of the iceberg, as I expect that most people would be much better at faking (or plagiarize) than what the good ol' scigen can do.

 

jaclaz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have 2 very, very serious questions:

#1 - Once Ebola finally goes airborne, won't the Ebola virus infect and kill the WiFi airborne virus?

#2 - Once everyone is forced by the government to get the Ebola vaccine, won't the 60% of the U.S population that isn't killed by the vaccine -- (after they bury the 40% of the U.S. population that is killed by the Ebola vaccine) -- then be protected from the WiFi virus, as well?

 

just thinking,

wondering,

and

questioning

 

gotta go now

 

every time I think,

I always get a headache

 

Larry

 

P.S. (lol)

Edited by larryb123456
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...