MrGRiM Posted December 23, 2015 Share Posted December 23, 2015 (edited) See screenshot - in AppInit_DLLs now wrote in my system, but do not work P.S. My english is badly.Uxstyle and Theme Signature Bypass for Windows 10 TH2 AKA 1511 AKA 10586Good news I was able to find an alternative to using patched system files from the RTM buildDoing it this way you can use as many styles as you like with Uxstyle or Theme Signature Bypass.1. Rename the default C:\Windows\Resources\Themes\aero\aerolite.msstyles to aerolite.msstyles.bak2. Make a new folder in C:\Windows\Resources\Themes\aero\ called aerolite.msstyles3. Put your theme in the aerolite.msstyles folder C:\Windows\Resources\Themes\aero\aerolite.msstyles\My Theme\My Theme.msstyles4. Make sure your .theme file uses this new directory.5. Select your theme from the personalization menu.So now you just use the aerolite.msstyles folder as the normal theme folder and you can have as many themes as you like.Note that if you do sfc/scannow or if you do a large Windows update to say Rs1 the themes will most likely be lost, so keep a backup of your themes.Not sure what that would result in, I guess it would just fall back to using the aerolite theme which could be a good thing as these large updates seem to break any older themes anyway. Important!!! Only use themes made for Windows 10 TH2 AKA 1511 AKA 10586 older themes will break your system. Edited December 23, 2015 by MrGRiM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raiden89 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 Can anyone tell me why this is happening? http://puu.sh/m6zy7/8fdf733e9a.png The borders on the left/right/bottom do not match the color of the titlebar itself. Also, when I make the window inactive, the borders, except the titlebar turn gray. This only happens when I have an atlas applied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhjohns Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 Interesting, but I don't have any borders. Personally, I find them unnecessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raiden89 Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 Well even in the titlebar, the far left and right sides are discolored...I dont want to remove the borders completely if I can help it...just wasnt sure what was causing it. Not using an atlas, it's fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JorgeA Posted December 24, 2015 Share Posted December 24, 2015 How dare you WANT to customize your desktop!! Hater!!! -Noel Sorry, Sir, I mistakenly thought I had a right to my own preferences and to act on them. Now I know better than to question Mother Microsoft. --JorgeA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kankipappa Posted December 27, 2015 Share Posted December 27, 2015 (edited) I'm having a weird issue with the latest 1.4.5 version. Similar like the issue above, as my borders and titlebar does have mismatch on colorization and/or the color brightness. Further tweaking on with the AeroGlassGUI revealed that on my desktop the title bar color is stuck at white and won't change. For example, If I select my glass color to be green and opacity to max, it still displays top-bar as pure white while the sides and bottom will respect the new color adjustment. Also, inactive border adjustments don't seem to work either, so inactive title bar is stuck at white color while borders are stuck with black. Is the GUI tweaker out of date and not compatible with the latest version, or does it still matter if I'm using 10240 build? I had to postpone the 10586 upgrade before when it broke the AeroGlass, and I remember I had a similar issue with the colors with the beta release version before, so something tells me it is not that... Doesn't seem matter if I'm using ANY custom atlas themes so my issue doesn't seem to be exactly linked in those. 1.4.1 still seems to work fine though, so I'm wondering what's wrong. Need to fix this as I don't want to postpone my upgrade indefinitely. Edited December 27, 2015 by Kankipappa 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dna-systems Posted December 28, 2015 Share Posted December 28, 2015 I'm having a weird issue with the latest 1.4.5 version. Similar like the issue above, as my borders and titlebar does have mismatch on colorization and/or the color brightness. Further tweaking on with the AeroGlassGUI revealed that on my desktop the title bar color is stuck at white and won't change. For example, If I select my glass color to be green and opacity to max, it still displays top-bar as pure white while the sides and bottom will respect the new color adjustment. Also, inactive border adjustments don't seem to work either, so inactive title bar is stuck at white color while borders are stuck with black. Is the GUI tweaker out of date and not compatible with the latest version, or does it still matter if I'm using 10240 build? I had to postpone the 10586 upgrade before when it broke the AeroGlass, and I remember I had a similar issue with the colors with the beta release version before, so something tells me it is not that... Doesn't seem matter if I'm using ANY custom atlas themes so my issue doesn't seem to be exactly linked in those. 1.4.1 still seems to work fine though, so I'm wondering what's wrong. Need to fix this as I don't want to postpone my upgrade indefinitely. I'm having the same issue here too... AeroGlass 1.4.5 works just fine but the GUI seems to be the culprit. I want a slightly black tint on the active title bars with a slight grey tint on inactive. Regardless of what color I choose, I can only adjust the opacity of the active title bar. It's not a deal breaker, but would eventually like to fine tune it. 1.4.1 would let me adjust color but no blur. 1.4.5 will let me adjust blur, but no color. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmdshft Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Same: http://tinypic.com/r/2z69imb/9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoelC Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Same: http://tinypic.com/r/2z69imb/9 I don't know about others, but I see nothing related to this thread at that link, just a note that "This site requires Flash 9". You might want to try to find a less intrusive way to share your photos. -Noel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
endbase Posted January 2, 2016 Share Posted January 2, 2016 Same: http://tinypic.com/r/2z69imb/9 I don't know about others, but I see nothing related to this thread at that link, just a note that "This site requires Flash 9". You might want to try to find a less intrusive way to share your photos. -Noel It is an movie about his dektop and he's fiddling around a bit nothing Big Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmdshft Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Same: http://tinypic.com/r/2z69imb/9 I don't know about others, but I see nothing related to this thread at that link, just a note that "This site requires Flash 9". You might want to try to find a less intrusive way to share your photos. -Noel You could also learn to be a little less rude. It was a video and I don't run my own webserver and needed a place to display the video I recorded of the bug in action. Thanks for your insightful help, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmdshft Posted January 4, 2016 Share Posted January 4, 2016 Anyway, I found a fix: http://www.cleodesktop.com/2015/11/install-uxthemepatcher-for-windows-10.html I no longer have the issue that I posted before, if you have the same issues, you need to manually patch Win 10 10586. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoelC Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 I'd have tried to help if I could see the video. As it was all I got was an attempt to show me ads (which failed) and run flash. People who try to push ads on others, even out of ignorance, deserve what they get. -Noel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmdshft Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 I'd have tried to help if I could see the video. As it was all I got was an attempt to show me ads (which failed) and run flash. People who try to push ads on others, even out of ignorance, deserve what they get. -Noel I didn't personally push the ads on you, so your condescension was unnecessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoelC Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 (edited) "You might want to try to find a less intrusive way to share your photos." isn't condescension. Here's some condescension: How about going and finding something better to do than hassle someone on a forum who followed your link with intention of trying to help you about advising you to use a better posting service. I don't know what, maybe like finding a better posting service. Same: http://tinypic.com/r/2z69imb/9 Someone who can't be bothered to post more than a one word question and a link to a site laden with ads shouldn't be pointing fingers about who's rude. -Noel Edited January 5, 2016 by NoelC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now