krose Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 (edited) First, thanks for HFSLIP 1.79 beta. Win2K works perfectly. However, for XP and HFSLIP 1.79, Windows media KB952069 hotfix is still showing up in WU for me. I extracted the hotfix, and each WMxx folder contains the files logagent.exe, wmnetngr.dll, and wmvcore.dll which are all v. 9.0.0.4504 for WM9. The files in my sourcess\i386 folder are v. 9.0.0.4503. I compressed the files from the hotfix with makecab, put them in my replace\i386 folder, and ran it again. No complaints from WU now. I can see the hotfix being extracted during the HFSLIP run but the files are not copied or are overwritten somehow. It also works placing the hotfix in the hfsvcpack_sw1 folder. Edited December 22, 2008 by krose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyp Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Feel like running a test? Open the script with your favorite text editor, locate line #1368. Type REM in the beginning of the line. Save the file and re-run the script. Make sure you save it as a CMD file. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krose Posted December 23, 2008 Author Share Posted December 23, 2008 (edited) see next post Edited December 23, 2008 by krose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krose Posted December 23, 2008 Author Share Posted December 23, 2008 (edited) I added REM to line 1368 and ran HFLSIP. Files in sourcess\i386 are still 9.0.0.4503. I paid close attention the the extraction of the hotfix and discovered that HFSLIP is extracting the files from the folder "mceur2" which are version 10.0.0.4362. WTF is mceur2? Here is a table of all the files from the hotfix from the MS bulletin at http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=952069.Windows Media Format Runtime 9.0, Windows Media Format Runtime 9.5, and Windows Media Format Runtime 11 for Windows XP Service Pack 3Folder name File name File version File size Date Time Platform Logagent.exe 10.0.0.4362 96,768 11-Jun-2008 07:47 x86mceur2 Wmnetmgr.dll 10.0.0.4362 988,672 11-Jun-2008 07:58 x86 Wmvcore.dll 10.0.0.4362 2,330,624 11-Jun-2008 07:58 x86 Logagent.exe 10.0.0.3703 96,768 10-Jun-2008 14:17 x86wm10 Wmnetmgr.dll 10.0.0.3703 1,026,048 10-Jun-2008 16:37 x86 Wmvcore.dll 10.0.0.3703 2,364,472 10-Jun-2008 16:57 x86 Logagent.exe 10.0.0.4066 96,768 10-Jun-2008 10:52 x86wm10l Wmnetmgr.dll 10.0.0.4066 1,028,096 10-Jun-2008 11:28 x86 Wmvcore.dll 10.0.0.4066 2,376,760 10-Jun-2008 12:07 x86 Logagent.exe 11.0.5721.5251 100,864 18-Jun-2008 06:09 x86wm11 Wmnetmgr.dll 11.0.5721.5251 938,496 18-Jun-2008 10:03 x86 Wmvcore.dll 11.0.5721.5251 2,458,112 18-Jun-2008 10:03 x86 Logagent.exe 9.0.0.4504 103,936 10-Jun-2008 08:11 x86wm9 Wmnetmgr.dll 9.0.0.4504 1,053,696 10-Jun-2008 11:11 x86 Wmvcore.dll 9.0.0.4504 2,174,976 07-Nov-2008 21:45 x86How does HFSLIP know which ones to extract? It would appear that for my purposes it should have used the wm9 files. Can HFSLIP be coded to use the correct files for a particular build? This looks like a real pita to fix.Edit: Sorry I can't seem to get a table of data lined up right. Edited December 23, 2008 by krose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geej Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 HFslip 1.7.9 is still beta... pls be patience for tommyp to fix these issues. As far as I know, he don't use XP. He's on W2k. (I hope I'm right). So it may takes a little while to fix...Suggest keep testing /reporting the beta version while still using 1.7.8 as the main script Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krose Posted December 23, 2008 Author Share Posted December 23, 2008 Oh I am in no hurry for a fix. I realize the effort HFLSIP takes. I have one box with a quad so I need to use XP or I would be using Win2k on it too. I will just use the replace folder for now and if there is a fix, fine; if not, the replace method works too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyp Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 (edited) krose - Geej is 100% correct, I use w2k and would go to linux before going to XP or Vista. The problem lies in that the folder name structure of this hotfix is different than the traditional WMP updates. Pls advise if this version works fine for you. I'll post the same on the beta thread once you report back.edit - see beta thread for zip file. Edited December 26, 2008 by tommyp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krose Posted December 24, 2008 Author Share Posted December 24, 2008 I am happy to report that with 1.79_ beta_c the file versions in sourcess\i386 are now 9.0.0.4504. May I ask what code you changed to achieve this? Thanks and Merry Christmas! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roadrunner64 Posted December 24, 2008 Share Posted December 24, 2008 Tommyp, I also tested the 1.79_ beta_c file out and successfully installed the KB952069 update as i had the same issue as krose. Now its all fixed and again no updates after my test!Thanks again and Merry Christmas! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyp Posted December 25, 2008 Share Posted December 25, 2008 Glad it worked out for you guys. The code that was changed/added is documented. Search in the text for 12/23 and you'll see the two (or more) lines of code added/modded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now