XibaD Posted July 17, 2008 Share Posted July 17, 2008 At least for me, new start button style messes with all skins but Windows XP default one. Quicklaunch is displayed over a part of the skin start button, and you can't move it.Pic: Is there any way to get Vistapack 2.4 again?ThanksP.S. : by the way, the new logos are pretty nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damian666 Posted July 17, 2008 Author Share Posted July 17, 2008 (edited) Xibad, long time no see man hmm, i did get that "bug" reported once, but its not really something i can fix.i think its about the visual style thats used, which is not made by me.so, i have to look if i still have teh old style for you.but in the meantime, lets try to figure out why not all of us are having this problem man.please tell me which extra's you have installed, especcialy the logofftext remover...see yadamian666@superleeds, with all due respect man... but if you dont use my pack, i cant help you here.open a seperate thread in the customizing windows forum, there you will get a awnser.i want to keep this thread clean.thanx Edited July 17, 2008 by damian666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kontini Posted July 18, 2008 Share Posted July 18, 2008 (edited) Check my post about start button:http://www.msfn.org/board/Vistapack-25-rel...035#entry776035 Edited July 18, 2008 by kontini Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damian666 Posted July 18, 2008 Author Share Posted July 18, 2008 aaah yes... i knew i saw it before i have replaced that bmp though...very weird.Damian666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisKuhli Posted July 19, 2008 Share Posted July 19, 2008 (edited) Damian666, you're today exactly two years @ MSFN As you are a very good competitor i wish you make the best of this saturday in the little hours you might on here As i doesn't want to make this topic cluttered i say you now my overall opinion about the work you make (including all projects here):Vistapack:I use it with my Windows 2000 Professional, with relatively simply options: (no Tclock or Tbar, TrueTransparency for the borders, other options as given by standard). It makes NT5 to the perfect Windows : as i say - everlasting Windows 2000!UTender:As i use in my Windows XP Media Center Edition 2005 the standard theme i don't need it. But it tested it a while ago with corrent result for checking purposes, so its a good tool! vUXTender:For another user account i need to install the Aero Theme "Vista_Classic by UkIntel" which makes this tool possible. Fine I wish all readers an writers in this forum and neighbourhood a nice saturday and ciao,Chris Edited July 19, 2008 by ChrisKuhli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damian666 Posted July 19, 2008 Author Share Posted July 19, 2008 thank you Damian666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XibaD Posted July 19, 2008 Share Posted July 19, 2008 aaah yes... i knew i saw it before i have replaced that bmp though...very weird.Damian666Nope, you haven't. Check kontini's post. If you replace the bmp, all is displayed fine. I think the issue was a mismatch in bmp sizes like he says.And by the way timedate.cpl error is still present in the spanish verision (the two tabs missing in time and date, referred to dialog resources 1 and 10). You have a little error in the script, check SP-timedate.cpl.txt and change language code to 3082. Anyway that correction doesn't change anything, the Vistapack removes that dialogs again. If I update with my fixes of the resources manually, all works perfect. But if I try to reload with Vistapack, it doesn't. I don't understand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damian666 Posted July 19, 2008 Author Share Posted July 19, 2008 thats weird man... let me look at it.one moment dude...Damian666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damian666 Posted July 19, 2008 Author Share Posted July 19, 2008 ok, listen man... the bitmap in explorer is certainly changed man, i really changed that f***. so, please check if you have it too man.and for the timedate.cpl, script is fixed now, but can you check if the language code in the resfiel is correct?thanx for testing again xibad damian666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisKuhli Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 (edited) Good Morning! I've decided for the new fresh native Windows 2000 Professional install using without TrueTransparency, like i described above.BTW the System-Properties are very awful in Windows 2000 Deutsch:Please for Windows Aktivie use "Windows Aktivierung" in german resources instead. Owner ist "Benutzer" and Company is "Firma"."Product-ID" is Produktschlüssel (if last too long write "Schlüssel" only.There is no oemlogo installed... What about that bitmaps and its displying?it looks very strange! Regards,Chris Edited July 22, 2008 by ChrisKuhli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damian666 Posted July 22, 2008 Author Share Posted July 22, 2008 well, with all due respect chris, but as you maybe remember...!!!YOU ARE THE ONE THAT TRANSLATED IT!!! :p:pso thats very funny man make me a new one then.Damian666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisKuhli Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 (edited) Hello well, with all due respect chris, but as you maybe remember...!!!YOU ARE THE ONE THAT TRANSLATED IT!!! :p:pso thats very funny man make me a new one then.Damian666I'm sorry but my complain was cause what i made is sooo old As i have no time until Friday - we'll have at weekend new files from me Chris Edited July 22, 2008 by ChrisKuhli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XibaD Posted July 22, 2008 Share Posted July 22, 2008 ok, listen man... the bitmap in explorer is certainly changed man, i really changed that f***. so, please check if you have it too man.and for the timedate.cpl, script is fixed now, but can you check if the language code in the resfiel is correct?thanx for testing again xibad damian666No It wasn't You have a PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damian666 Posted July 23, 2008 Author Share Posted July 23, 2008 well, yeah it was man i changed the scvript the moment i saw your post, but we have fixed some other stuff to so thanx again damian666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisKuhli Posted July 23, 2008 Share Posted July 23, 2008 (edited) Look Damian666!101 DIALOGEX 32, 10, 435, 249STYLE DS_FIXEDSYS | DS_MODALFRAME | WS_POPUP | WS_VISIBLE | WS_CAPTIONEXSTYLE WS_EX_TRANSPARENTCAPTION "Algemein"LANGUAGE LANG_GERMAN, SUBLANG_GERMANFONT 8, "MS Shell Dlg"{ CONTROL "Windows version:", 10, BUTTON, BS_GROUPBOX | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 139, 8, 294, 66 CONTROL "", 51, STATIC, SS_BITMAP | SS_CENTERIMAGE | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 350, 14, 81, 57 CONTROL "", 52, STATIC, SS_LEFT | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 147, 31, 125, 8 CONTROL "", 53, STATIC, SS_LEFT | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 147, 43, 125, 8 CONTROL "", 54, STATIC, SS_LEFT | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 199, 93, 125, 8 CONTROL "", 55, STATIC, SS_LEFT | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 199, 110, 125, 8 CONTROL "Windows Aktivierung", 12, BUTTON, BS_GROUPBOX | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 139, 81, 294, 58 , 0x00000020 CONTROL 3, 0, STATIC, SS_BITMAP | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 360, 99, 57, 30 CONTROL "", 56, EDIT, ES_LEFT | ES_AUTOHSCROLL | ES_READONLY | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 205, 128, 94, 8 CONTROL "", 57, EDIT, ES_LEFT | ES_AUTOHSCROLL | ES_READONLY | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 203, 121, 125, 8 CONTROL "Produkt-ID: ", 80, EDIT, ES_LEFT | ES_AUTOHSCROLL | ES_READONLY | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 146, 128, 48, 8 CONTROL "", 58, EDIT, ES_LEFT | ES_AUTOHSCROLL | ES_READONLY | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 147, 140, 125, 8 CONTROL "Hergestellt und unterstützt von:", 58, STATIC, SS_CENTER | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 285, 142, 120, 8 CONTROL "", 60, STATIC, SS_BITMAP | SS_CENTERIMAGE | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 285, 163, 120, 70 CONTROL "", 61, STATIC, SS_LEFT | SS_NOPREFIX | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 290, 153, 110, 8 CONTROL "", 62, STATIC, SS_LEFT | SS_NOPREFIX | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 143, 173, 110, 8 CONTROL "", 63, STATIC, SS_LEFT | SS_NOPREFIX | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 143, 185, 110, 8 CONTROL "", 64, STATIC, SS_LEFT | SS_NOPREFIX | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 141, 196, 110, 8 CONTROL "", 65, STATIC, SS_LEFT | SS_NOPREFIX | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 141, 208, 110, 8 CONTROL "", 66, STATIC, SS_LEFT | SS_NOPREFIX | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE | WS_GROUP, 141, 217, 110, 8 CONTROL "&Supportinformationen...", 67, BUTTON, BS_PUSHBUTTON | WS_CHILD | WS_DISABLED | WS_TABSTOP, 149, 220, 105, 14 CONTROL 6, 68, STATIC, SS_BITMAP | SS_CENTERIMAGE | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 1, 2, 132, 232 CONTROL "Windows ist aktiviert", 9, STATIC, SS_LEFT | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 334, 87, 95, 10 CONTROL "Windows 2000", 8, STATIC, SS_LEFT | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 145, 17, 79, 10 CONTROL "Benutzer: ", 80, EDIT, ES_LEFT | ES_AUTOHSCROLL | ES_READONLY | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 146, 93, 43, 8 CONTROL "Firma: ", 80, EDIT, ES_LEFT | ES_AUTOHSCROLL | ES_READONLY | WS_CHILD | WS_VISIBLE, 146, 110, 43, 8 }Surprised?Only the graphic on the left is a bit awful. It might be better to use old-fashioned dialog Chris Edited July 23, 2008 by ChrisKuhli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now