Legolash2o Posted May 9, 2008 Share Posted May 9, 2008 (edited) You know one time there was that separate pack for nLite which you could use in case you did not want to download .NET Framework, is it possible one can be made for vLite please or at least the list of "references" and/or files as they are called on Visual Studio so i can make my own? thanks in advanceLiam Edited May 13, 2008 by LegoLiam™ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oskingen Posted May 9, 2008 Share Posted May 9, 2008 That would be nice. I'm always wondering how can i do that for visual studio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legolash2o Posted May 9, 2008 Author Share Posted May 9, 2008 (edited) Well .NET is something like 1GB, i don't want to keep that just for 1 program (vLite) when 10-20MB of files will do or at least make vLite keep the files needed for vLite to work when a user has selected .NET for removal (save bandwidth and easier). Edited May 9, 2008 by LegoLiam™ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petrarca Posted May 9, 2008 Share Posted May 9, 2008 (edited) Well .NET is something like 1GBNo, not even remotely close The .net folder on my Win2008 x64 installation is 154 MB (162,008,059 bytes).The .net 2.0 redistributable download is only 22.4MB (x86) or 45.2MB (x64).How did you come up with this ludicrous 1GB? Edited May 9, 2008 by Petrarca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legolash2o Posted May 9, 2008 Author Share Posted May 9, 2008 (edited) vLite, said in top corner something like 1,070MB, before i removed .NET my install size was around 2.2gb+ now its around 1.2gb...EDIT: I'm using Vista Ultimate x64, x64 .NET is pretty much twice as big as x86. Edited May 10, 2008 by LegoLiam™ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Etz Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 (edited) Well .NET is something like 1GBNo, not even remotely close The .net folder on my Win2008 x64 installation is 154 MB (162,008,059 bytes).The .net 2.0 redistributable download is only 22.4MB (x86) or 45.2MB (x64).How did you come up with this ludicrous 1GB? WTF Wanted to move x64 Business...Have to think...nLite+Vlite+bf2cc is the only programs that I use...So basically 1GB "runtimes" to keep 3 programs running? Otherwords...If I want "utilize my 4GB ram" wisely... Edited May 10, 2008 by Etz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legolash2o Posted May 10, 2008 Author Share Posted May 10, 2008 the 1GB .NET is hard drive space not RAM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Etz Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 (edited) the 1GB .NET is hard drive space not RAMSorry... you misunderstood, me...Basically, I have 4GB RAM...Vista & XP Pro (in use) give me usable 3,2 GB...If I want to use all 4GB, then I have to go x64... (more upgrades comin...GOOD OC RAM is "dirty cheap" )Also the .NET components use twice as much in 64-bit, then in 32-bit system... ?That what i read, from your first post EDIT:1.Sorry for bad english, I dont write it everyday...after a "bucket of beer" 2. Fixed typos, added, aditional Information. Edited May 10, 2008 by Etz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legolash2o Posted May 10, 2008 Author Share Posted May 10, 2008 (edited) x64 .NET takes twice as much hard drive space as x86 .NET Edited May 10, 2008 by LegoLiam™ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Etz Posted May 10, 2008 Share Posted May 10, 2008 (edited) x64 .NET takes twice as much hard drive space as x86.So I guess, I undertsood it correctly If You can build seperate runtimes for vLite, let me know Bf2cc I can discard, it runs, on linux over mono aswell, vlite & nLite is the issue... nLite has (perfect) replacement, so it`s OK... resolved...Still vLite doesn`t have them (yet) ...It`s insane, to keep 1GB runtimes for three (10MB) programs 2x36GB Raptors , ain`t so big, that space can be wasted EDIT:If people think, that Linux is better, for 4GB...32-Bit linuxes, suffers the same issue... (its 32-bit archidecture not OS`es fault) BTW: Linux Live CD`s support only 1GB of ram (Because they include "universal" kernels, that can run your old Intel P1`s aswell) Edited May 10, 2008 by Etz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petrarca Posted May 11, 2008 Share Posted May 11, 2008 the 1GB .NET is hard drive spaceNo, it's not Why do you keep saying this nonsense? As I've said already, the hard drive space for .net x64 after installation is 153MB for .net 2.0 - and for .net 3.5, it's 238 MB (which includes .net 2.0 and 3.0 runtimes as well). Space used for the x86 version is about half of that.Again, that's not even remotely close to the 1GB you claim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legolash2o Posted May 11, 2008 Author Share Posted May 11, 2008 (edited) As i said before.. before i removed .NET my windows installation (after install)was ~2.26gb, after i tried it with .NET removed it was ~1.2gb which works out to be around 1GBI have taken a screen shot with a red square around the size... it says "1,070.27MB" which is pretty 1GB (1,024MB is a GB to be precise but oh well)..So since vLite reports my installation will be ~1GB less and then my installation size is ~1GB less aswell... i think that means .NET is 1GB (for Vista anyway). Edited May 11, 2008 by LegoLiam™ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aviv00 Posted May 11, 2008 Share Posted May 11, 2008 (edited) hope nuhi will consider make net2 and net3 removal separatelycos pkgmgr.exe dont do good jobnet3 should be marked as non-extreme really good to get ride of it Edited May 11, 2008 by aviv00 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petrarca Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 As i said before.. before i removed .NET my windows installation (after install)was ~2.26gb, after i tried it with .NET removed it was ~1.2gb which works out to be around 1GBI have taken a screen shot with a red square around the size... it says "1,070.27MB" which is pretty 1GB (1,024MB is a GB to be precise but oh well)..So since vLite reports my installation will be ~1GB less and then my installation size is ~1GB less aswell... i think that means .NET is 1GB (for Vista anyway).Then I don't know what the hell vLite is removing, because .net only uses 182MB on my Windows 2008 x64:Also, the .net installer is only 46MB (or 22MB for x86) - it should be clear that this can't be blown up to the epic proportions of 1GB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underxp Posted May 12, 2008 Share Posted May 12, 2008 (edited) To LegoLiam:1) Install nLite Runtimes 3 to vLite Folder (10 files, 1 folder, 12 MB aprox.)2) Copy the next files (from .NET 2 SP1) to vLite Folder (Don't copy into vLite\v2.0.50727 !!!!!!):System.dll, System.Drawing.dll, System.Windows.Forms.dll, System.XML.dllTotal: 14 files+ 1 folder = 23 MB aprox.Tested in vLite 1.1.6 beta/RC/Final and previous version too NOTE: DON'T try if you have .net 2 already installed in your machine. Edited May 12, 2008 by underxp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now