Jump to content

What will Windows 7 look like?


neo

Recommended Posts

Microsoft® is staying fairly tight-lipped about what the next iteration of its Windows OS will feature, but the company's recent moves in other areas provide some clues

everyone has heard how Microsoft plans to release the next Windows client OS, Windows 7, in 2010. But what the company is not making clear is what new features the OS will have, a topic that has become fodder for educated Windows 7 speculation.

Analysts said Microsoft probably is keeping tight-lipped about what Windows 7 will look like because at this point, company engineers and executives don't even know.

"They don't want to commit because they don't have a good idea what's in it," said Michael Silver, an analyst with Gartner. "We're three years out, so you can't really expect that much detail."

Michael Cherry, an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, said that with so many people still in the midst of upgrading to the latest client OS, Windows Vista, he's hesitant to speculate on what might be in the next OS. "We barely know the features of the one we just got," he said with a laugh.

That said, Cherry is expecting less "earth-shattering" new features than improvements on some of the new ones found in Windows Vista, such as the Bitlocker encryption feature, which is currently hard for the average PC user to navigate.

"You have to partition your hard drive and do a bunch of things, and you can only really today protect one drive, whereas many machines have more than one," he said.

Cherry also pointed to a common hardware performance problem many users face because of Vista's "very large footprint." "It's one of the things they might want to address -- hardware utilization and performance," he said. "It's hard to put a big wrapper around that; it just needs to be better."

One Microsoft executive gave a slight hint about what might turn up in Windows 7 earlier this year at the RSA Conference in San Francisco. Ben Fathi, corporate vice president of development with Microsoft's Windows Core Operating System Division, said in an interview that a "fundamental piece of enabling technology," such as a hypervisor or a drastic change in the user interface, would likely turn up in Windows 7.

Fathi also said at RSA in February that Microsoft was in the middle of the planning process for Windows 7's features and would know more over the next few months, which suggests the company now has a good idea what the OS will look like but is declining to disclose that information.

While both a hypervisor and a new user interface are possibilities for Windows 7, the former is almost a given, Gartner's Silver said. "It almost has to go" in the OS, he said, describing the technology as "a really thin OS" that manages virtual machines running on the system.

It would behoove Microsoft to put a hypervisor in Windows 7 because it would give them more control over the hardware the OS runs on, something the company would prefer to have, Silver said.

"The hypervisor really owns the hardware, and Microsoft likes owning the hardware, and they want to be one of the people to standardize [hypervisor technology]," he said.

Vista includes such new features as desktop search and a new user interface, which also are two areas that leave room for expansion in Windows 7, analysts said.

Microsoft has shown the direction it's going with the latter with its Surface computer, introduced in late May. That form factor looks like a coffee table with a touchscreen interface that lets users move photos around by hand and synchronize devices by placing them on the table.

With products like the Apple iPhone making the touchscreen popular with consumers, a touchscreen UI in Windows 7 is a possibility, Silver said. "They don't want to look bad next to Apple," he said.

Desktop search, a new feature built into Vista, also has room for improvement. Microsoft has said it will link desktop search to Windows Server 2008 so desktop users can search not only for local files but also for files on the server. This is a feature that potentially could be built into the desktop OS.

InfoWord.Com

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I thought that 'Windows' was being dropped and future OS's would have a different name? Not that it really matters.

It should have some inspiration from the Office 2007 ribbon:

And as he did with Office 2007, Sinofsky has declared that all bets are off when it comes to the UI of Windows 7. He's hired Julie Larson-Green, who lead the Office 2007 user interface team under Sinofsky's watch, as VP in charge of the "the Windows User Experience" or UX program.

http://apcmag.com/6741/new_ui_for_windows_7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

that would be pretty stupid if the dropped the "windows" name. i could care less about windows 7 right now because half of the stuff they talk about most likely wont be in there. remember all the hype about the new filesystem that was supposed to be in vista? :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually you guys should be way more optimistic about the OS after Vista, as MS's track record has been very good in this aspect. What I'm referring to is MS's one-two punch with their OS/Kernels. Everytime MS releases a major kernel improvement, the OS is just fine, but with the second release, they spend all their time perfecting the OS.

Just look at history... 98 (second punch) was substantially better than 95 (first punch), XP is substantially better than 2000. So it's pretty fair to expect Windows 7 to be substantially better than Vista. It should be faster, require less memory (but possibly pre-cache more aggressively which is how XP got a bad rep of needing more ram, but doesn't) and have the UI we'd like to see.

I'm very optimistic about Windows 7, and MS is shooting for a 2009/2010 release date, they learned their lesson about 5yr dev cycles. We'll get to see all the neat things Vista was suppose to gave but didn't make it, such as the SQL based file system, and resolution independence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...