Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'Chrome'.
Found 12 results
-
"While touted as an alternative to TCP, QUIC poses several security concerns for network operators. Standard network security appliances cannot easily identify QUIC traffic, which makes this network protocol vulnerable to cyber criminal activity." "Why do Network Security Teams Not Like Google QUIC? Despite its perceived positives, QUIC could inadvertently have a negative impact on network security. That’s because security appliances like firewalls and network sensors typically are not able to access information they had previously relied on with legacy TCP sessions. This creates a ‘black hole’ that hackers can exploit. Here’s the main problem: Standard network security devices can’t determine the QUIC application protocol, viewing it like layer 4 UDP traffic. While browsers and supported web servers can differentiate between QUIC traffic and other traffic, standard network security like firewalls can’t. This means firewalls are less effective at detecting incoming threats, putting network security at risk. To complicate the challenge for cyber threat hunters, Google revises its protocol frequently, and threat detection tools must catch up with these ever-changing standards. There are other issues. QUIC, similar to TLS 1.3, applies its encryption at the transport layer and not in the higher layers. Hence, it encrypts all transport information, which can virtually eliminate the attack surface that TCP offers. Plus, it’s increasingly difficult to measure and analyze QUIC traffic using reporting tools because, again, firewalls and standard network sensors don’t recognize it. This is a plus for consumer privacy but causes significant challenges for those responsible for protecting our communications networks." source. https://netquestcorp.com/google-quic-and-network-security/ -
As we already know, QUIC brings nothing but troubles! This wonderful solution to fix video playback worked for me as well, and I want to share. Tried all the standard solutions, reinstall, disabling hardware acceleration, clearing the cache, none of it worked. Then I found the following solution: edge://flags/ and setting Experimental QUIC protocol to disabled. Everything is now working perfect for me now. sourced from Reddit users. https://www.reddit.com/r/edge/comments/12u35dr/youtube_video_streaming_stutter_in_edge_possible/
-
As most of you already know, chrome dropped support for RTM 1507, and possibly others (needs to be tested), despite the official statements, "To use Chrome browser on Windows, you'll need: Windows 10 ". They may edit any time, so make copies. The lies is well within their usual behaviour. The discovery was made by @yoltboy01. Ladies, please gather the remains of your will and stay on-topic, be polite and respectful, stick to the facts. All have a nice chat.
-
I noticed this post a few years back in the browser thread https://msfn.org/board/topic/180462-my-browser-builds-part-2/page/198/ and was wondering if this was actually true this whole time and they have just covered it up to look like it not so my question is has firefox really secretly been chrome based this whole time and they just never said anything about it?
-
I'm looking into different browser choices for windows 7 and chrome was what I found works best except that it can't be used above ver 109 so my question is has anyone gotten version of chrome above ver 109 working on windows 7? this has been a big research project for me and would like to know if anyone has found a solution yet to this problem-legacyfan
-
will newer versions of chrome work on windows 7? I know its been discussed before and was just wondering if anything ever came out of this (if anyone could help with this it would be much appreciated
-
Hi all ! From what we know, I ditched 360 Explorer quite some time ago and upgraded to Chromium 102. It's the Ungoogled version, their official one. But, as you can see on the screenshots, some of the members began to look weird. Weird looking @Jaguarek62, Tripredacus and some others, while @msfntor, @jaclaz , @win32 and me are absolutely normal ! Why is that ? Ideas ? It was fine on 360 Explorer , yet I can't use it since it's in the past. Is it the website not sending the right icons/colours, I dunno. Help appreciated.
-
So ... here we go again. Another article that reminds me that its time to barbecue the old clunker and dig out the abacus and grandfather clock out of the moldy basement and forget about electronics altogether Seriously, got to always be serious - no time for funny business. https://thehackernews.com/2021/12/14-new-xs-leaks-cross-site-leaks.html I see mitigation techniques mentioned for only firefox and nothing about Chrome?! " At the end-user side, turning on first-party isolation as well as Enhanced Tracking Prevention in Firefox have been found to decrease the applicability of XS-Leaks. Intelligent Tracking Prevention in Safari, which blocks third-party cookies by default, also prevents all leaks that are not based on a pop-up. I prefer to always block 3rd party cookies; always. Perhaps there exists something 'along the lines' of First Party Isolation in Chrome that I'm unaware of. Isn't it nice when they scare you with no solution. If the microwave were big enough I'd try to just hide in it. Oh, and, by the way; I know (first hand) now, the refrigerator light does go out when you close the door Any thoughts about possible mitigation to lesson vulnerability? -
Installing a Google Chrome on Windows XP? Does supports? Does works?
-
I have a firefox Add-on that I would like to run on Google Chrome. Unfortunately, I could not find any guide on how to port Firefox Addon to run on Chrome. Does anybody know a tutorial on how to do so?
-
Looking for last or late version of the retired Chrome frame
Guest posted a topic in Software Hangout
Bah. I did one more search after posting this and found it right away. I'll leave it up in case someone else needs frame. My user agent string.. Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; chromeframe/32.0.1700.107 Get frame here: http://dl.google.com/chrome/install/GoogleChromeframeStandaloneEnterprise.msi (may be pulled at any time) Anyone know where I can get the last version of Chrome Frame? I found v15 but they made it up to version 30 something a couple of months ago. I moved the newest Chrome files into the frame folder and it works but not as good. I want the real thing. I've looked for around for an hour or so it seems in the last couple of days but can't find it. I'm not asking for anyone to do the legwork. I'll keep at it myself for a week if need be. Just if someone know by the off chance who's still hosting Chrome Frame. Reason being stupid apps like Secunia PSI use the IE engine and send me around the web on IE8 which I don't want happening. Thanks -
Google+ forced down our throats may become a thing of the past
Guest posted a topic in Technology News
Looks like we might see Google stop forcing us to have a Google+ account to do Google things. I hated it from the outset and for those like me that like their YouTube, Gmail or Google Chrome accounts disconnected from Google+ may finally see the light of day. Yipee! http://techcrunch.com/2014/04/24/google-is-walking-dead/
