Jump to content

Steven W

Member
  • Posts

    352
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by Steven W

  1. Have you done a clean install after replacing memory/ video card? If not, I'd reset the BIOS to default options before doing, perhaps choosing compatibility mode for HD, if applicable. Do not reinstall over current install, do format and all.

    Edit: My Motherboard only allowed two choices for the graphics card: 'On Chip VGA' and 'PEG slot' which I assumed (still do) means PCI Express Graphics slot. Sorry I didn't recall that earlier, hope your not in the same boat.

    Further Edit: I may have had motherboard resource conflicts too, until I updated the drivers using Intel's update I pointed to above or the unofficial one (for the 865) I pointed to in my original post:

    http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/158239-installing-98se-on-emachines-w3629/#entry1009973

    I had to extract them and do them manually, I went into the device manager and updated that way. One at a time, yeah it's a pain, but it obviously worked for me.

  2. It may not be the exact motherboard, but I did get 98SE running on a 945:

    http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/158239-installing-98se-on-emachines-w3629/

    Try it with 1 GB memory if possible. IMO, you should give up on AutoPatcher too. Try the unofficial SP instead. As you can see, I just used the generic inbuilt Intel Graphics card and the VBEMP 9x driver, so your result may be different.

    Quick advice (FWIW):

    Get to 1 GB RAM

    Reinstall

    You're already booting -- no need to fiddle with HD settings.

    Install this:

    http://www.mdgx.com/files/48BITLBA.EXE

    Reboot, see if you can get drivers going.

    Don't mess with updates (Patchers and SP included) until you can get the drivers going.

    BTW, the last official Intel Chipset driver will update a few drivers:

    https://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=Y&DwnldID=8177&ProdId=816〈=eng&OSVersion=Windows%2098%20SE*&DownloadType=Software%20Archives

    I had to do them manually.

    You might want to check out:

    http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/163405-slipstreamable-intel-chipset-inf-drivers/

  3. I had to laugh when I ran across this:

    http://adminextra.com/threads/zb-block.3518/

    Note Mikey's thoughts:

    So you block this user due to windows 95 being their OS?

    And you are blocking ISP's which you deem unreputable, but SOME of those users on those ISP's are legitimate. I would not use this script if you paid me, seems that alot of the decisions are purely judgemental, rather than helping to protect your site from hackers or bruteforce.

    Amen, Mikey. Amen. BTW, I should say that no one with half a brain ever implemented "RST cookies" like I mentioned above.

  4. The only thing I can guess that he could be yabbering about is "RST cookies"

    DoS Attacks (cont.)

    Methods of Prevention

    RST Cookies
    • Server sends a false SYNACK back
    • Should receive an RST in reply that something is wrong
    • If this happens, this verifies that host is legitimate
    • Not compatible with Windows 95 or possibly machines behind firewalls

    Was there an update that addressed this issue specifically? Not saying this is how he's detecting 95, just likely what he's talking about.

  5. Would some one here elaborate on what the Z Bot instigator means by this statement :"MS never updated the Windows TCP/IP stack to handle random port DNS, thus any machine identifying itself with that string, is actually a bot with a B.S user agent."

    Could someone explain the technical aspects of the process he alludes to, and how he (if serious) could misconstrue himself into believing no can still use 95 anymore?

    The entire quote is:

    It means that there are no windows 95 machines that can access the net anymore since they went to random port DNS. This was done to stop domain spoofing/dns server stuffing.
    Microsoft never updated the Windows 95 TCP/IP stack to handle random port DNS, thus, any machine identing itself with that string, is actually a bot with a B.S. User agent.

    Don't you wish someone would have told you that you can't access the internet on Windows 95 before you did Andrew T.? I'm going to have to get the ol' Win 3.1 system up and running to see if I can access the site.

    Edit: User adwade is getting quite an edumacation from that post. :crazy:

  6. Taking a shot in the dark, as I've never seen this bug in the official builds with KernelEx, but did have issues when building with the VC toolkit 2003. Found a solution after some Googling:

    http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=692065

    The solution, as described in that post, is to implement the build options:

    ac_add_options --disable-parental-controls
    ac_add_options --disable-vista-sdk-requirements

    exclude all calls to nsDownloadScanner in nsDownloadManager.cpp

    and either stripping the 256x256 image from firefox.ico or replacing firefox.ico with one from Firefox 2.x.

    I'm thinking this may be related because, as schwups said:

    A workaround for the current session. It works here only until reboot. I added a second theme (here vista aero), loaded it and then FF looks fine. Then I changed the theme back to default.

    Just a guess.

  7. I know it's been a while since anyone has posted in this forum, but I'm going through this now. I could not get setup.exe to work. I finally figured out that by copying KEY.DAT from the installation CD to the hard drive renaming it KEY.Reg and double-clicking (putting info in registry) it that I could run ACMBOOT.EXE to get Visual Studio to install. Don't know whether it matters or not, but I made a zero byte file named msjava.dll in the Windows folder before doing anything else.

    Figured I'd post here in case anyone else would find this useful.

  8. copy excel.exe, xlintl32.dll and get xl8409.dll from the Excel Viewer 97, put in folder and get functioning Excel.

    Edit: Macros don't work, but simple formulas do.

    Further Edit: Should mention I'm using Win7 now, when trying Macros says Stdole2.tlb is missing, may be okay on older Windows...IDK

  9. Obviously, this is something that every person is going to have to decide for him/herself. I rarely actually use it anymore just to chat with a friend whom insists on using it that lives half-way around globe. I can understand Andrew's pursuit of it as a curiosity. Reminds me of one of my first (if not my very first) post here at MSFN:

    http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/82947-in2tv-and-more-on-win98/

    and jds's attempts to get Zimbra going under Win98:

    http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/163408-zimbra-desktop-722-potential-outlook-replacement/

    As I've stated there, I'm not impressed with Zimbra's software, but as for the intellectual challenge of getting it going on an older version of Windows -- that kinda of stuff interests me.

    Forgive my rambling, just reminiscing :)

×
×
  • Create New...