Asp

Tried a few things. Booting to Mint, it detected and set up the printer by itself and I could print a page within 2 seconds. So, the cabling and hardware is all good. Back in XP, tried to print again. It took about 4 minutes, the status panel kept going to "receiving data" to "processing data" over and over. Looking at the print queue, (screenshot) I see that the print file is 276 kB, and after 3 minutes it has only sent 256 kB. I don't know why it stalls or finally gets over the hump, but it does, and the page looks perfect. So the drivers are good. I have never used a USB printer on XP before, (plenty of other USB devices) so I suspect that is the issue. Should it really be "Generic IEEE 1284.4 printing support"?

I've been using HP Laserjets for many years now. Currently a HP 2420. Connected to my XP PC first by parallel port. Later, with a network model, went to ethernet, making it available to laptops and phones. All worked pretty smoothly. A few months ago, my desk router died. That took the ethernet from the wall socket to the main router and connected my PC and the printer, gave each a local IP.. So I connected the PC directly to the wall socket but now had no port for the printer, so I got a USB cable and plugged it in to the PC. It detected the printer and I installed the drivers. "Printers" shows it connected to "DOT4_001" port, "Generic IEEE 1284.4 Printing Support". Previously, by ethernet or parallel, sending a simple print job took maybe 2 seconds, and it would start printing after another 2 seconds. With USB, I see on its panel "Receiving data" then "Processing data" then ":Receiving data", "Processing data".... seemingly endlessly. I stopped and restarted both PC and printer several times. Eventually I tried again and let it go, it took two minutes then it finally started printing. The page was perfect. I will replace the router, but in the meantime, why is USB so slow, what is going on? Port settings? Tried different USB sockets on the PC, both USB2 and USB3, no change.

Thanks, but the idea of it being a cable issue is hard to reconcile with it being fixed by a reboot. Conceivably, the router has put the wired connection to sleep and doesn't wake it up correctly when XP pings it? But have never had such a problem before, with other routers and this PC over the years (it's about 11 years old). Most of the house: laptops, phones, lights, cat feeder,.... uses wifi, so need that to be on. Pretty sure no neighbours are connecting. I check the router's webpage fairly often, especially while playing around with this problem, and see the list of connected devices. And today booted first to Linux: full speed. Later rebooted to XP, and still full speed. Will do a cold boot to XP next time and see what happens. So, still not seeing a pattern. PS: did a cold boot to XP, and get the delayed appearance of the Network Connections icon on the toolbar,and the bad connections and time outs for web pages and email. So I tried disabling the LAN in Network connections, wait a few seconds, reenable. Now a "good" connection. Check email in a second or two instead of 30 or time out. Beginning to dread this may be a sign of an underlying hardware issue, making it take longer than normal to bring up the connection. Have seen a TV slowly lose functionality, probably due to aging capacitors not giving full power when needed. Maybe Linux is OK because it takes longer to boot, or handles it better somehow,. Later may try connecting a laptop by cable and seeing how that goes, will tell me if it's the router or cabling. . . .

Well, today first boot had no connection. System was 99% idle. Rebooted and have normal speed. Maybe it is somehow hardware after all, Tomorrow might try to boot up Linux first and see how that goes.

WinXP SP3 For several years I used a router with DD-WRT to connect to our home Wi-Fi, my PC connected to the router by ethernet. And that was pretty stable. But the router died and I didn't have a usable one to hand to replace it with so I installed a TP-Link USB Wi-Fi dongle, That worked mostly OK, but sometimes just lost connection for no obvious reason, while the signal was strong with mobile devices. Maybe inactivity time out somewhere? So I laid some cable and went to a direct ethernet connection to our main router which is connected to a fibre modem. This should have been faster and more reliable, but has some issues. Sometimes loading a web page was extremely, extremely slow, though not dead. But then I could do an Oookla Speedtest and get 50 MBps. And checking email (using Eudora via POP) would keep timing out. i.e., not just a browser issue. And if I rebooted into Mint,, speed was normal. Back in XP, I found that if I just rebooted, usually speed and connectivity was normal the next time. I suspected a loose connection, crawled around and reseated the plugs. No obvious changes, So, not a hardware or cabling problem I am pretty sure. When I had a bad connection, I noticed that the LAN icon on the toolbar had taken several seconds to appear after booting. Any idea how to fix this, short of reboot and pray? Could there be some TP-Link code screwing up the ethernet driver? Though I have had the drivers for that installed for years as well, but reinstalled recently. I just uninstalled it, though it's useful to have at hand in case home ethernet goes offline and I use my phone as a hotspot.

OK,, sorry about that. At least that explains why there hasn't been much discussion of this here since it seems otherwise on topic.

[Warez link redacted] I could not find a topic about this here, let me know if I missed it. Wondering if any have tried it and have an assessment to share?

Update: the plugin "RightToClick 2.9.6" is the one that was blocking New Moon using Cloudflare. I don't use it often so disabled it. Can get by just by turning off Javascript if a page is screwing with me.

How long is a long time? I have 4 cores i5 3570, 3.6GHz, and it's been 20 minutes with no change, refreshed 3 times. Process Explorer shows the whole PC using 5%. So I don't think it is even trying. Since you said NM works, I restarted in safe mode, and this time it could pass in a few seconds.. So need to work out what add-on, adblocker, etc, is the issue. Never heard of Supermium. From a quick look it's a variant of Chrome? Will give it a try.

I am getting blocked by websites that use Cloudflare hosting, I get stuck forever on pages like: https://annas-archive.se/slow_download/cfaaf2af56fd5956bd3f875b7f235726/0/0 "Verifying you are human. This may take a few seconds. annas-archive.se needs to review the security of your connection before proceeding." No problem on newer OSes. On XP I am using what I think is the latest version of "New Moon" NM28XP build: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20250531-d849524bd-uxp-4cb39ffa48-xpmod.7z The version number, 28.10.7a1 does not appear to have changed for quite a while. Is there any way to get past Cloudflare, or any other browser that works on WinXP 32 that can? Possibly related, I am now not able to log in to my account on https://imgur.com/

Thanks. Tried it, and it worked for things like notepad.exe. By when I tried : c:\Windows\System32\devmgmt.msc Device Manager It showed the icon in the Control Panel, but clicking on it did not do anything. But the icon caption, is empty, despite it being in the config file (following the executable) so it seems that it parses to "exe". All the examples were exe programs, so seems it just does not work with .msc. PS: found a work around. I made a batch file devmgmt.bat that just contains c:\Windows\System32\devmgmt.msc and in YourCPLConfig.txt c:\Windows\System32\devmgmt.bat Device Manager So now I do have an icon (a batch cogwheel though) that launches Device Manager.

I know this is ten years old, and mjrt hasn't been around since 2016 ... but maybe someone is watching this. I have been looking at using Gavotte with my XP with 16 GB of physical RAM. This seems to do what I want: to use the inaccessible RAM for a swap file and TEMP. But I'm trying to understand exactly how it is set up: Do I just run : "install.cmd" and then Gavotte will create a RAM disk on every boot and set it as location for pagefile.sys and the TEMP folder? Do I need to do anything else? Do I need to run "Ramdisk Layout Builder.cmd"? I previously tried to install Gavotte from the original release, and got mysterious errors (Process Explorer would not load, for instance) and beeps so uninstalled. How do I uninstall this if it does the same? How do I uninstall if I can't get it working? Not seeing that makes me wary of just trying it out.

I have 16GB RAM now with my WinXP3 PC. It also boots to Linux, where I can use all the RAM, but XP, where I still spend most of my time, is limited to 4GB. I know there are hacks to increase that, but I doubt the apps I use would be improved. But space is getting tight on my boot SSD, and I do have a 2GB pagefile. So: 1) Do I actually need a pagefile? 2) If I do, can this be put into "high RAM", in the 12GB WinXP can't use anyway? EDIT: found this suggestion on Reddit that seems promising.:

User Agent is the default: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.7) Goanna/6.7 PaleMoon/33.2 If "Mozilla" isn't what they want,, what should it be? I installed the Sasuga add-on to have site-specific user agents. (https://addons.palemoon.org/addon/sasuga/) Maybe that will let me use Twitter again. Have been locked out of that for a while too.

I don't know if this is the right place to report issues, please advise if not. I'm using New Moon on WinXP SP3. Problem with DuckDuckGo for a while now, and update to the latest New Moon 2024-10-24 did not help. I can enter a search term in DDG's search box and get a page of results. But every link gives me a "400 Bad Request" page. Apparently the DDG server thinks I am doing something nasty. No problem using other browsers on other devices at home, so my IP isn't blacklisted. And Google is working fine. Disabling uBlock for the site did not help.