Klemper

So we may safely assume, no support for XP was ever inttended. Look here, https://aidanfinn.com/?p=13179 "Why Windows Server 2012 Hyper-V VHDX 4K Alignment Is So Important The current VHD driver assumes a physical sector size of 512 bytes and issues 512-byte I/Os, which makes it incompatible with these disks. As a result, the current VHD driver cannot open VHD files on physical 4 KB sector disks. Hyper-V makes it possible to store VHDs on 4 KB disks by implementing a software RMW algorithm in the VHD layer to convert the 512-byte access and update request to the VHD file to corresponding 4 KB accesses and updates."

AI answer.

I see, but how any of this is related to 1050 Ti and its inability to use drivers under XP?

Booting from such a drive, no. Storing allegedly pirated content, such as films, games and 2160p WebRips, on an external drive with 4Kn sectors, yes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Format

A lot of evidence on youtube. With 1050??? Which driver?

Use search, find this video. Translate the description from Bulgarian, you will see no acceleration will ever work in Pascal 1000 series. Add ten bucks, buy a 1070 instead of the garbage 1050, if you're willing to try, 'cause 1050 will simply BSOD on you. The driver WITHOUT H/W acceleration is in the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwTvvQ3MuDk

@mjd79have your ever tried --memory-pressure-off ?

So! It's basically Ungoogled, right? No more need to apply patches @NotHereToPlayGames asked you to apply for him several posts before?

You're one helluva dev.! I just saw you use 1700 Rysen, it's not far away from what I have (G4620), could it be performed on 8.1?

Nice to know and thank you for taking care of potentially dangerous users! Anyways, the profile picture problem is still there. I uploaded a 44kb .gif image, just like it was instructed by the forum, yet it re-saved to 3kb.

Respectfully, I apologise, but @NotHereToPlayGames has no way of knowing what was or wasn't done or changed in Supermium at all. All what he wrote here is speculations, not facts. And how does he know that any modifications were done to the Java engine of the browser at all? It's Java what is not working for the login window, I'm pretty sure you perfectly understand that. There was no need to meddle with the Java engine just to make the browser work on XP. It's nonsense. So far, all facts, including the ability to log in from oldish versions, similar imports to the v.124, non- working sandbox, etc. all point out to the outdated browser core, and @NotHereToPlayGames can't prove otherwise. With huge respect.

Why do I get notification for your replies? I think it was another member who tagged you. @ED_Sln and @D.Draker, they ordered a version for Vista from the Chinese student, he made it after a couple of hours, and it runs on Vista WITHOUT SP!!! How long did it take for Supermium to geat there? Several years? And it's super buggy. Write to the Chinese student, probably he will make one for your XP, but it will take a bit longer, three hours, maybe...

It's been checked already, no issues with any Chrome based (Brave, CatsXP, "normal" Chromium), all as low as 107, no issues with either nVidia or Twitch. We haven't tried lower, but someone tried 360EE, and the login window won't show up, probably, just like Supermium, v.86 also needs EXPERIMENTAL features to be turned on in the flags section to not fail!

This is not true! Nvidia gaming website had terrible problems with Supermium, NOT ONLY TWITCH. Please closely follow the issues on github, and only then accuse people.

We're already far beyond that point, the new Chinese browser based on v.136 works absolutely perfect with Vista. Been testing it for weeks now. No memory leaks, all is good. No buffer overflow like in Supermium.