Karla Sleutel

Tripredacus, the user could be from a troublesome location, Nigeria, Russia, Uganda, whatever. I tried to make an account, they simply asked me for a word. I didn't even have to solve captchas. Though, there is an error in the word colour, a misspelling.

Slight correction: Vista+ without the extended kernel for quite some time now ...

In the whatever category. https://msfn.org/board/topic/183495-mypal-68/

EOL notifications after installing for any update from July 2022 and onwards: [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\EOSNotify] "DiscontinueEOS"=dword:00000001

I totally agree with both hands! Windows 7 was very unstable, and needed to reboot frequently. luckily I don't use 7. If it says one needs to make a donation, seems scummy, yes, but the free ones could also be gathering info, phishing.., No one actually knows, the OP @Atom99, we are sorry.

Most notorious telemetry updates for Win 7 and their descriptions: KB4493132-x86-x64 (End of support notification for Windows 7) KB4524752-x86-x64 (End of support notification for Windows 7 Pro) KB971033-x86-x64 (Update for Windows activation verification technologies) KB2952664-x86-x64 (System compatibility update for transition to Windows 10) KB2977759-x86-x64 (Diagnostics for compatibility issues for transition to Windows 10) KB3021917-x86-x64 (System diagnostics and telemetry for transition to Windows 10) KB3035583-x86-x64 (Update installs the ‘Get Windows 10’ app) KB3068708-x86-x64 (Update to improve quality and telemetry diagnostics) KB3075249-x86-x64 (Update adds telemetry points to the consent.exe file) KB3080149-x86-x64 (Update for CEIP and telemetry diagnostics) KB3081954-x86-x64 (Update to improve working folders and telemetry) KB3123862-x86-x64 (Updated capabilities for upgrading to Windows 10) KB3139923-x86-x64 (Update adds telemetry points to consent.exe file) KB3150513-x86-x64 (Updated configurations for compatibility diagnostics) KB3161608-x86-x64 (Update adds telemetry points to consent.exe file) KB3163589-x86-x64 (Message about running an outdated version of Windows) KB3172605-x86-x64 (Update adds telemetry points to consent.exe) KB3173040-x86-x64 (Notification about the expiration of the Windows 10 upgrade offer) KB3125574-v4 (also inludes unnamed telemetry)

@Dave-H, please clear up, is it fine to publicly refer to a group of people as id*ots, namely Microsoft testers, if they are not MSFN members?

Because the previous exploit patch was also intended for a much higher core version, Namely, 138+.

I tried some updates from 2015-2020, they all increased the system brightness. The same happens with Vista. Namely, the culprit of excessive brightness is SHA-2 2015 (normal update) and PosReady, too. windows6.1-kb3072630-x64_d5130670d4c9ce8618180fa8f2ce40401b9ca7e4

Fascinating article! I'd also be interested to how to make a very slim image without the original telemetry that was there in 2009 already.

What is there not enough on micro-ATX boards? There's lots of boards even with the oldish PCI!

Could this be sufficient proof that the previous patch for 138+ was also not applicable to M132?

What to do if I someone holds two passports?

So I updated my Vista SP2 x64 to 2016, still no joy. Chromium for Windows 7 by e3kskoy7wqk starts with the same method! Ideas? I don't understand what else CatsXP wants, aren't those both made for win 7?

What for? It's obsolete, no matter how good it was 2 years ago. D.Draker no longer recommends this browser due to the age. https://msfn.org/board/topic/186346-i-moved-to-centbrowser-im-not-happy-about-it/page/5/#findComment-1275874

Then it's a good idea to use the patched ungoogled for Server 2008 R2. No one knows and no one can guarantee how good and when the old 132 Supermium will (ever?) be patched for that serious vulnerability. https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/ungoogled-chromium_138.0.7204.96 Edit/ They say it's been patched in R5. But in the article they say the patch is for 138+! Contradictory. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v132-r5

His post is neither useless, nor senseless. Learn to look for before you write your senseless posts It's been confirmed by reputable members of MSFN that those don't work. "This didn't work for me." https://msfn.org/board/topic/186420-mod-for-intel-haswell-4600-hd-graphics-drivers-for-xp/#findComment-1271208 "Edit: After a while (5-8hours) if the PC is not used, the mouse works but I can't open anything that was minimized in the taskbar. I have to restart the PC to get it working again. Did you see this kind of behaviour? I'm using 32bit XP." https://msfn.org/board/topic/186420-mod-for-intel-haswell-4600-hd-graphics-drivers-for-xp/#findComment-1271490

Yes, I can. Then leave only one, what stops you? Never heard of XP using two modern cards all at once in one setup troub;e free.

When one has a dedicated card, the onboard needs to be disabled in BIOS.

That was clear, but from what they tell, looks like the patch is intended to be applied only to 138+. Who would write a patch for the old 132, while we are at 140+ already?

Isn't the minimum requirement chromium 138? https://www.securityweek.com/chrome-138-update-patches-zero-day-vulnerability/

brought back manifest v2 extension support. Cool! https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/140.0.7275.1

It's ‎macOS, not relevant.

By whose definition? I'm pretty sure they did a research among the testers during the beta.

Can safely declare official funeral. Mid summer, not even a slightest rumour about the supposed April beta, @D.Draker's prophecy fulfilled.