Karla Sleutel

What to do if I someone holds two passports?

So I updated my Vista SP2 x64 to 2016, still no joy. Chromium for Windows 7 by e3kskoy7wqk starts with the same method! Ideas? I don't understand what else CatsXP wants, aren't those both made for win 7?

What for? It's obsolete, no matter how good it was 2 years ago. D.Draker no longer recommends this browser due to the age. https://msfn.org/board/topic/186346-i-moved-to-centbrowser-im-not-happy-about-it/page/5/#findComment-1275874

Then it's a good idea to use the patched ungoogled for Server 2008 R2. No one knows and no one can guarantee how good and when the old 132 Supermium will (ever?) be patched for that serious vulnerability. https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/ungoogled-chromium_138.0.7204.96 Edit/ They say it's been patched in R5. But in the article they say the patch is for 138+! Contradictory. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v132-r5

His post is neither useless, nor senseless. Learn to look for before you write your senseless posts It's been confirmed by reputable members of MSFN that those don't work. "This didn't work for me." https://msfn.org/board/topic/186420-mod-for-intel-haswell-4600-hd-graphics-drivers-for-xp/#findComment-1271208 "Edit: After a while (5-8hours) if the PC is not used, the mouse works but I can't open anything that was minimized in the taskbar. I have to restart the PC to get it working again. Did you see this kind of behaviour? I'm using 32bit XP." https://msfn.org/board/topic/186420-mod-for-intel-haswell-4600-hd-graphics-drivers-for-xp/#findComment-1271490

Yes, I can. Then leave only one, what stops you? Never heard of XP using two modern cards all at once in one setup troub;e free.

When one has a dedicated card, the onboard needs to be disabled in BIOS.

That was clear, but from what they tell, looks like the patch is intended to be applied only to 138+. Who would write a patch for the old 132, while we are at 140+ already?

Isn't the minimum requirement chromium 138? https://www.securityweek.com/chrome-138-update-patches-zero-day-vulnerability/

brought back manifest v2 extension support. Cool! https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/140.0.7275.1

It's ‎macOS, not relevant.

By whose definition? I'm pretty sure they did a research among the testers during the beta.

Can safely declare official funeral. Mid summer, not even a slightest rumour about the supposed April beta, @D.Draker's prophecy fulfilled.

Clear data on exit. The flag doesn't work, cookies are still being left, just discovered. UPD. Never mind, started working after several re-launches.

@ED_Sln, in 137 Hints are still there. Look. The flag doesn't work, again. Did it, ever?

Guys, girls thanks all, I'll try to switch off the extensions one by one, cloudflare may not like them.

Could you help me to run CatsXP, maybe? I could only get up to the 125th version of it.

That I can't do, I need to maintain the gaming performance. BTW, I had managed to start 137. But not 140. And with the old redirection method, WITHOUT SM files at all. I don't have any EX kernels extensions installed.

The site is still blocked on the DNS level in some countries like Canada. Obtained the latest 132 copy from Github. Now I get this.

Supermium's advapi misses this api. How do you run it, then?

Totally right, interesting observation! "It was dropped in Beta 1 (Build 5112) of Vista for all errors except boot loader errors. It can also be found (but rarely) in early builds of Windows 98, even when it was known as codename "Memphis", because these early builds have poor/broken ACPI support." https://www.betaarchive.com/wiki/index.php?title=Windows_crash_screens

But it existed before! It'd be confusing.

My-my, someone indeed has a strong disdain towards GDPR.

Then I deleted the Supermium wrapper NdDll, and without it I now see NO missing dependencies, but no start nevertheless.

Then I saw an old advice from D.Draker and replaced it with just NtOpenKey. Now I get this.