Jump to content

marco_a

Member
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Italy

Posts posted by marco_a

  1. Thank you jaclaz,

    I did further experiments and it seems that permissions are not related to this problem.

    Then I moved the whole folder containing this installer to another PC running XP and it had exactly the same behavior: the short path does work, the long path doesn't.

    Eventually I moved the same folder to another PC running Win98 and it had exactly the same behavior BUT with a verbose error message (photos in attachment).

    You are right: the problem is not related to the OS but it is related to this installer. I think I don't need further investigation. :cool: 

     

    photo_2022-10-07_16-06-54.jpg

    photo_2022-10-07_16-07-05.jpg

  2. I am migrating some legacy software (native for Win95, Win98, NT4.0 as AutoCAD 2000, Autolisp/ARX libraries, plot /CNC drivers) from an old XP computer to another computer running Win 7. This legacy software runs with no issue on Win 7 32bit with a few tricks (run as administrator, run in compatibility mode XP2) but, during installation, I've found a problem; I tried to run an executable from a long path but it didn't work:

    C:\Users\cad2000\Desktop\ASUS_Q87M-E\Aggiornamenti_AutoCAD2000\risolve_stampa_autocad_2000\Plotupdate2000\Plotupdate2000>setup.exe
    Impossibile eseguire il programma specificato.

    Sorry for the italian language. I suppose it translates to: unable to execute the specified program or the system cannot execute the specified program.

    But modern software runs from the same folder with no problem at all.

    Then I moved the folder of the same legacy software to the desktop and the executable worked fine with no issue:

    C:\Users\cad2000\Desktop\Plotupdate2000>setup.exe

    The only difference I can see is the length of the path.

    Do you think the legacy software can have problems with long path names?

     

×
×
  • Create New...