NotHereToPlayGames
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by NotHereToPlayGames
-
-
On 5/27/2022 at 6:59 AM, AstroSkipper said:
Unfortunately the Chrome browsers 360Chrome v11 and 360Chrome v13 are not working with the new interface of virustotal.com. I tried to change some script related flags, but without any success.
Works for me! Did you try in an incognito window or a fresh/clean profile? This should ALWAYS be the FIRST step. You'd be AMAZED at how many people will always return a day or two later, "Oops, it was one of my extensions."
0 -
I have a "official" Pale Moon + Stylem version floating around somewhere in my archives where my Stylem style sheet reconfigured the address bar to not display the "padlock" AT ALL!
0 -
52 minutes ago, Eddie Phizika said:
I would really love to understand where do people base their claims . . .
Agreed. For nostalgia, I was reading my own posts regarding "ssl padlock" and "secure DNS" and "certificate errors" over at the Proxomitron Forum and I find it hillarious that everything the Proxo community was saying way back in 2009 is still true to this day.
Web browser "ssl" has been a FLAWED technology since its inception!
1 -
10 hours ago, Eddie Phizika said:
No actual problem happening, security issues are MASSIVELY overblown
I wish there was a way to place three DOZEN upvotes! The BEST thing that Chrome ever did, in my opinion, was the --ignore-certificate-errors startup flag!
1 -
Use the --ignore-certificate-errors Chromium startup flag.
0 -
47 minutes ago, XPerceniol said:
Guess, you could also blame me
That's different! You and I are both on XP. Which is / was the "targeted audience" (ie, as if my skin didn't tell the end-user that, lol).
1 -
7 minutes ago, D.Draker said:
so we need a guinea pig
That's what VMs are for. I use Portable VirtualBox v4.3.28.
0 -
The "simple text" snideness is unwelcomed. I do not follow your feed! Never have! I answer questions in this thread (it's MY thread, afterall).
Much more important things in life then remembering each and every discussion herein. Much more important.
Don't know what to tell you. You really should consider diving in and creating it yourself. It's not that difficult.
And I would be much more inclined to answer questions as to "how" as opposed to being some kind of dog chasing its own tail.
I did not undertake this project to release constant build after build after build each and every time "upstream" makes a minor change that language barrier prevents us from knowing the "exacts" of such a minor change.
0 -
11 minutes ago, Mathwiz said:
I don't entirely trust Mozilla, but I trust them more than Google!
It's the OPPOSITE for me. To Google, I am but a needle in a haystack the size of China. To Mozilla, I am but a needle in a haystack the size of Cleveland.
0 -
1 hour ago, D.Draker said:
Perhaps someone would be interested to unpack the portable version and compare it with the existing one ?
You seem to be the ONLY person wanting an "update" and I kind of feel like you've been pushing it for a VERY long time.
Several posts by you to report upstream updates.
I think the bigger question is "why" ?
The only thing that "upstream" really does is add junk that we remove anyway.
0 -
14 minutes ago, D.Draker said:
is it supposed to @not@ remember "audio mute" setting ? Thanks.
Doesn't work "upstream" either. Nothing I can do to fix what is also broken "upstream".
0 -
12 minutes ago, i430VX said:
If you have more blue light, you must also have more red/green, or the effective color would be blue.
Agreed!
They don't make things like they used to, as the saying goes.
My $160 cheapie 50" Onn non-smart LED 4K TV died at only three years old.
I just replaced it with a $145 cheapie 55" LG non-smart LED 4K TV.
I know that higher quality TVs cost more and last longer ("you get what you pay for"), but when you divide out the lifespan by the dollars spent, I will always take the cheapie.
But even being a cheapie, this new 55" LG non-smart has a "Reduce Blue Light" option.
When enabled everything looks like crap, everything turns a bit orangeish or greenish depening on the color it is SUPPOSED TO BE and skin tone might as well be some alien sci-fi movie from the 60s!
0 -
It doesn't, that I am aware of.
But I do know this, I've only been using Chromium-based (and it's at the point where I have ZERO plans to ever return to Mozilla-based) for close to two years.
And pretty much EVERYTHING that I have ever searched for in regards to Chromium-based issues along the way, right there in the TOP THREE replies is ALWAYS "disable hardware acceleration".
And that "suggestion" never seems to rely on OS.
It's akin to when you contact tech support for software and the FIRST thing they ALWAYS tell you is "disable your antivirus".
0 -
Which of these settings are checked versus unchecked? And please tell me you have NOT NOT NOT enabled "Use hardware acceleration? This should *NEVER* have *EVER* been a Chrome/Chromium option as far as I'm concerned!
0 -
I do not get that popup in my skin either. You may have a corrupted profile. Make certain that there are no registry entries when 360Chrome is not running.
0 -
I wouldn't really call it a "speed-up" option.
If I understand it, it PRELOADS content based on links in your CURRENT page. So your downloaded bytes go through the roof and you maybe never went away from page one so why enable the browser to load content for page two?
Page two loads faster because it loads portions of it before you clicked away from page one.
2 -
42 minutes ago, D.Draker said:
Gotta be ready , no ?
I will decide how I spend my free time. The core engine has never been updated since early beta versions of v13. Please stop trying to coerce me into creating yet another version. All the info, tools required, and detailed instructions on "how" Humming Owl and I have created these have been provided over the years. Feel free.
0 -
All versions should be considered FINAL at this stage. Non-negotiable.
0 -
I have abandoned v13.5. But the referenced dialog does NOT appear to be coming from the skin.
It's one of the added bloatware items that is "fetched" when you enable the setting for it (similar to the ad-blocker and download manager bloatware that has already removed from the settings GUI).
0 -
It's not only my water bill. The time is "already here" for me to move on from v11
V11 and v13 score virtually identical as far as javascript speed - blows ALL Mozilla-based browser completely out of the water, out of the sky, out of the asteroid belt.
1 -
18 minutes ago, XPerceniol said:
I'm quite shocked on just how well Serpent is working now with those changes/updates.
A step in the right direction. But still not for me
0 -
1 minute ago, UCyborg said:
OP must have an issue that is beyond "normal" issues due to sites' overuse of JavaScript if he has a problem on MSFN.
Agreed. Like he's trying to get by with 256 MB of RAM and wonders why things keep locking up on him.
1 -
Disregard. NM28 is vastly INFERIOR and I cannot in good faith "reverse course" and revert to my used-to-be-beloved Mozilla Variants.
1 -
You may have simply posted your query (but then never returned to read it?) less than 24 hours too soon.
Try the New Moon v28 version updated within the last 24 hours.
0
What will you do after Windows 7 ESU ends?
in Windows 7
Posted
Too funny. You don't like the "competition"? I'm just messin'.
There's really only 15 to 25 active members here at MSFN. HALF of which, like you and me BOTH, have our "bored" days and derail without realizing it until a day or two later, "Oops, why did I post that?"
And no, "predicting" your reply, I'm not planning on hunting them down. Something about never arguing with folks that LIKE to argue. We BOTH have our days.
No worries though (this is no longer my "home", but still enjoy the "company" when I do drop by). It's like that EVERYWHERE. Whether we care to admit to it or not