NotHereToPlayGames

That I can agree to! A far cry from the one million you cited in your first "bs" post! BUT your computer's "vulnerabilities" DON'T MEAN JACK SH&T TO MOST OF US HERE AT MSFN! The security of your computer only ties so much to your browser, the rest is all tied to your OS. We probably have more XP users here than anything. Do you think they care how "insecure" XP is? REGARDLESS of how often somebody likes you comes along and reminds them of how many years old XP is! Tons of Vista users here also. Do you think they care how "insecure" Vista is? Are they falsely deducing that an "extended kernel" patches these insecurities? Hint - functions are added, vulnerabilities are not patched. Et cetera. You really are *BIASED* and just LOVE to pick fights! The admins allow it, nothing technically "against forum rules". Carry On, Wayward Son. Moving on... "Toodles"...

Please put this back in the hole that you pulled it out of. Thanks.

*Biased* hypocritical exaggerations like that is why I will *never* "follow you*. Unless you yourself run Win11 (maybe even Win10), then STOP RAM-RODDING THE BS ABOUT SOMETHING A YEAR OLD !!! !!! !!!

Not going to happen. Sorry, just isn't! Call it a "personality clash".

I see that Sampei.Nihira has unfortunately been "ran off the board" by folks probably jabbing his ribs too frequently. Can't say as I blame him, to be honest, sticking around here does at times feel like a "bad decision". At work, we have been "forced" to upgrade to Win11 (kind of surprised it took this long). I use Official Chrome v122 here at work. It always scored Speedometer 2.1 at a 310 to 325 range in Win10. In Win11, the same exact Chrome v122 profile scores 398 to 402. Nothing changed except Win10 upgraded to Win11. Still a far cry from Mac's that I've seen hit 530+.

PATIENCE. He releases his ungoogled only once a month or two, a faster pace than that is ridiculous. Just because Official Chrome is updated every 2 to 4 *weeks* or so, *NONE OF US* should expect forks to be released *BY ONE PERSON* on such a *RAPID-FIRE* pace. It really "will not kill you" to run v133 for a month or two and *WAIT* for the *one-person project* to release an ungoogled v137 or v138. Maybe a v136 will be released, maybe it won't. If an end-user must-must-must have "cutting edge latest-and-greatest", then that user can not rely on FORKS - seems more than fair to me!

These are his *ONLY TWO* ungoogled versions. You can NOT use those flags and migrate a profile from one computer to another in anything *OTHER THAN* these *TWO*.

This gets OLD OLD OLD OLD OLD OLD OLD OLD. I have no idea what a Dell 2407 is and what the "F-ing" obsession is with "you and your followers" always using this "phrase". At any rate, I DO NOT CARE, I am not a "gamer" and do not need brand new computers ever six months just to watch blood splattering in 4K super-hi-def !!! !!! !!! I do not need a new mobile phone every six months. I do not need a new LED/Plasma/OLED/Whatever monitor every six months. I do not need a new house every six months. etc etc etc Supermium is still being targeted for folks like me, for hardware that isn't brand new every six months, or even every 10 years. Until Supermium developer sends out a "F U all of you XP/Vista/7/10 users, we no longer support anything below Win11 and we no longer support anything older than SIX MONTHS", then, well, "curse you" and your "crew" that wants to belittle my 12yr old computer. "Curse You" "Curse You" "Curse You"... GETTING OLD! ENOUGH WITH THE D#MN RIB-JABS!!! GOT IT?

Here is one of my newer but it is still not my newest. I still only run D3D9 intentionally and on purpose, but sure, if you have some "test" for me to run, I *might* oblige.

No, but I would be fired if I visited MSFN from a lab bench pc/laptop and they run on a company VPN when I bring a laptop home for work activities. Sorry, I will not put my job on the line by screencapping company hardware. The company lets us keep them after 8yrs. Most of my computers here at home are old work machines. The one I screencap'd is sitting here in the living room, it is my *OLDEST* but it's just *EASIEST* to screencap from it when sitting here watching news. But no, I do not buy brand new laptops every six months, whether you want me to or not.

We run some EXTREMELY FAST and VERY EXPENSIVE hardware at work. I drop down to D3D9 INTENTIONALLY, ON PURPOSE, and I really should not have to detail my bullet points for doing so.

This is also from my ** ** ** OLDEST HARDWARE ** ** **

THA T IS NOT MY LAPTOP !!! !!! !!! THAT IS MY OLDEST HARDWARE !!! !!! !!!

Not sure why you think I need to "prove" this to you, but see below. I change hardware a LOT. This is my *OLDEST* computer. Why in the H#LL do "you guys" think I am "poverty" running ancient crap? My laptop costs more than my daughter's car. And no, I'm not going to "prove" that to you and "your obsession". Moving on... "Toodles"...

This enormous cache with DX11 is on a top-of-the-line laptop only 2.5yrs old. I DO NOT WANT DX11 AND THE CACHE THAT COMES WITH USING IT! MY needs should NOT be such an OBSESSION on YOUR end!

Several of my computers are capable of DX11. I DISABLE INTENTIONALLY. Why? Because the shader cache grows and grows and grows and I only use PORTABLE browsers, migrating from computer to computer to computer, and have no interest in GIGANTIC shader caches.

That's the wrong file. That's also not a "portable" version of 360Chrome. The loader that we are referring to only exists in the "portable" versions of 360Chrome.

For those two parameters, the test is to copy your browser profile to a USB Memory Stick or a shared network folder and then copy that profile to another computer then launch the browser in that other computer. If your extensions are still there, then these two parameters did their job. If the other computer starts with an empty profile, then these parameters did not do their job. If you are not migrating a profile from one computer to another, then you do not need these two parameters to begin with, these flags are for portability and migrating between computers.

Not always. I actually prefer X-Launcher over-and-above 360Chrome's launcher. 360Chrome's launcher has an embedded "integrity check" that can cause problems on some systems (but not on all systems). 360Chrome's launcher has embedded telemetry that has been removed during the patching/modifying of my 360Chrome releases - but its original existence should still regard it as as "suspect" over launchers that do not contain such embeds. X-Launcher is more "universal".

You're not following the whole conversation. All of this was to answer the specific needs of somebody on XP. Why are you throwing Vista into the conversation? The first solution I offered does not work in XP. This solution does. The person we are helping is on XP. Not Vista. Not 10. Not Kylin. Not TempleOS. Not MythOS. et cetera...

Meant as NOTHING MORE than A STARTING POINT. Add to, remove from. Totally up to the end-user preferences.

A starting-point

No, you use what you want, I'll use what I want. D3D9 sets a cache of 4 files. D3D11 sets HUNDREDS of cache files. In other words, SSD Killing Feature

Disabeled chromecast and the UDP ports that it opens.

MSFN members specifically asked how to delete during Supermium exit, I provided a solution. All Chrome-based browsers create, delete, and recreate this file over and over and over. Adding as a startup or exit delete only controls "when", because the browser itself is already creating, deleting, and recreating over and over and over.