feodor2

What about differance between pentium4 and cor2duo or differance between xp and vista. You please tell what is the point? Okey the one certain differance is multi and singleprocess, then I suppose 60% of the code is a differance.

For the very long time "(the one with all the "plus" and "minus" signs)" disabled by default, you are to enable "advanced user" and even then for unblocking (to show green) press ctrl two times. Log works fine too, you there missed to select what to log, so assume the ublock you used before very very old. So much changed - you better learn it as a completely new.

The one missing thing has been determined, I try to add it next version.

This particular midilibre.fr does not work no matter the version. Also I checked it in 115 fox. The koreus site sets "default" as default, I checked other two and they work on 74 too. So I do not know what is it, somebody else please confirm

You please always give exact links I checked these on 74 and 68 - all work equally - nothing to do. midilibre.fr - videos played equally https://www.koreus.com/video/eriovixia-gryffindori.html video loads only on the site reloading. Also when you check 68 and 74 do you use the same profiles?

Ublock 65 is fine, I use it for some two weeks The list of installed custom buttons may be fixed too https://github.com/Feodor2/Mypal68/issues/426#issuecomment-3172415836

Bad idea then, I only take what see fit, who knows how many other 78 things missed. So comment just that only one line mentioned

Yes, it is about Bug 1609556 - Migrate toolbar-context-menu to Fluent (Firefox 78+) comment this one below inside the addon if (!FOX85 && appVersion >= 78 && url == "chrome://custombuttons/content/overlay.xul") Shall consider to put the version 78 then Still not looked, and still not going. You please ask here, I do not watch others there. So you ask about the version is impaired, sure indeed, no any version is complete paired, one most close is a javascript, but promise-resolvers thing from the 120 version for example. In all do not rely on the number.

So if to disable csp they can know it. What about of the idea of fake csp to make them think that it is enabled? By the why in chromes flag "disable-security" make the browser completely ignores all sesurity s***.

We discovered recently that 74 version has bug in the csp, it breaks several sites that worked before. You may disable it: security.csp.enable;false csp designed to forbid interference on a site. Аdvanced users do interference with scripts, however in the newer firefoxes (102 already) the setting has been removed, I wont do this but wonder how users overcome this in the newer firefoxes.

Yes this did not work too, but fixed when updated ublock to the latest 65 version. So it is a bug with ublock 64.

So please give an exact link which is playing on 68.14.8 and not on the 74.1.0 I see you put pictures (unnecessary) but different why? Particular videos was broken on invidus in its best times As I told invidus broken for me long ago before 68.14.8, but today I checked nadeko.net and there videos play regardless the version

Are you sure? For me it no longer works everywhere, they are mostly dead because of stupidity to openly discuss their cause and more stupid was the automatic switch to other invidious when one failed.

@exogenesis Try updated SSE version, I have put another ucrt which to be good with pentuim3 About addons they are all made for multiprocess long before 68, but some things may not work in the single process, no time to investigate as not important.

So here I give more information. I did same path as firefox did, and put 74 version because this is where I stopped of clean of xul, yes not all xull stuff has been removed, this essential about interfere new functions, remember wrong icons on permissions. Also you may want to learn yourself what and when removed between 68-74. For everybody else this is unnecessary junk information waste to discuss.

@AstroSkipper may be you missed something, do it again carefully and do not forget about purgecaches If any other fellow use custumbuttons too please confirm. I say again that other your written page is irrelevant, also I thing this is unnecessary information here for others too, so may considered as spam or flame whatever.

This hubbub is all irrelevant. Nevertheless one place checks MOZ_APP_VERSION So you can fix this diff --git a/chrome/custombuttons/content/SelfHelper/SelfHelper.jsm b/chrome/custombuttons/content/SelfHelper/SelfHelper.jsm index 8e009ac..42807e7 100644 --- a/chrome/custombuttons/content/SelfHelper/SelfHelper.jsm +++ b/chrome/custombuttons/content/SelfHelper/SelfHelper.jsm @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ var AC, SelfHelper = { this.platform = ["win", "linux", "macosx"] .includes(platform) ? platform : "linux"; - this.version = parseInt(AppConstants.MOZ_APP_VERSION); + this.version = 74; if (this.version >= 95) { var pref = "extensions.custombuttons.prefersColorSchemeOverride"; var pb = Cc["@mozilla.org/preferences-service;1"].getService(Ci.nsIPrefBranch); I shall think out what to do with the version discord.

Custumbuttons rely on the platformVersion, if the value was left 68 it thinks that the xul is preset therefore fails, thats why I lift platformVersion to 74. But it rely not only the version, but other things which is silly I thing, I am to investigate further.

set extensions.allowPrivateBrowsingByDefault to false and it will install

@NotHereToPlayGames About vorapis supposed you block unwanted connections, it is intricated thing required connection to their home and to the google even if youtube doesn't. That's why I dropped it

Okey this is not CatsXP, not a chrome at all. What do you mean "fully working", as I know mozilla has push to the firefox the very same cromish "sandbox" (flash and drm for xp) I already told that consider it useless. From the beginning I did only 32bit versions and not bothered with its "sandbox", but if you want I may enable it for х64 and shall see, no point in saving resources there.

You keep gnawing this why, what do you want actually? Flash has gone, DRM is not possible. And yes firefox 68 has many win10 specifics, while that mostly was removed from mypal. The same reason he told

Certainly useless, and not designed for singleprocess. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Sandbox#Current_Status In addition several of these things works only on win10.

Then here we may consider the mypal as the original firedox 68, another matter if will be differences there

Supposed we all know what the sandbox is, I mean the particular setting in the particular browser - it is not truly a sandbox, no matter disable it or enable, and about nvidia what?