Jump to content

SweetLow

Member
  • Posts

    54
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Belarus

Posts posted by SweetLow

  1. On 4/13/2024 at 7:59 AM, defuser said:

    How can I change the drive letter?

    As with any PM only drive - in Device Manager made it Removable, set letter, made it non Removable. And as drive can stopped and started in Device Manager - no reboot needed (if no swap file on this drive, of course).

    >It seems that this is the first full-fledged PSE ramdisk in history that
    installs and works directly under WINDOWS!

    The first PSE drive for Windows was made by Intel for Windows NT 4.0 ~ 25 years ago :)

    >It would be nice if someone (who already uses such hardware) checked this right away.

    You have to know already that I'am running one of my Windows 98 SE on Core i7 10700...

    >the question also arises of the compatibility of RAMDRV4M with more promising hardware

    There is no problem for compatibility for pure protected mode software. The problem of RLoew's solution is transition from real mode code that drives something to protected mode code that access memory and back.

    >and a message appeared on a blue background "Windows The volume that
    was removed had open files on it. Next time please check first to see if the volume can really be
    removed. Press any key to continue."

    Read readme...

    > Is it really in RAM?

    Read readme...

  2. ramdrv4m - Universal RAM Drive for Windows 9x

    https://github.com/LordOfMice/Tools/blob/master/ramdrv4m.zip

    Features description:
    1. Memory support above 4GiB (default mode).
    Primary purpose of creating this software.
    2. A full-fledged 32-bit protected mode driver.
    3. High speed of operation.
    4. Can utilize RAM Drives created in memory
    by other software. In particular, it is compatible with
    RAMDSK32/64 from RLoew.
    5. It consumes only 4MiB of virtual address space.
    In addition to the real memory used for RAM Drive itself, of course.
    6. Works on Pentium and higher class processors 
    (i.e. it does not work on 80486).

    As usual - readme is your best friend...

  3. 19 minutes ago, defuser said:

    For clarity, let's say if we take a computer based on 440BX or similar, fully 9x compatible, does this recording succeed there?

    Yes. With this flag cleared kernel mode code is ignoring the fact that page is read-only and writes on this page successfully.

  4. 12 hours ago, MrMateczko said:

    Is IgnorePnPBIOS even a valid option? I can't find it mentioned anywhere besides your posts, hard to believe no-one found it before you...

    The best expirience is test it youself if you doubt. But i didn't believe in this fact too:

    http://forum.ru-board.com/topic.cgi?forum=62&topic=28114&start=5240#17 (translate the P.S. from this post)

    P.S. And i can demonstrate few other (registry) options which i found when i really need them ;)

  5. On 8/22/2023 at 5:18 PM, defuser said:

    is it possible to somehow configure or replace the ACPI Table even before Windows starts

    It is possible before and (much easy to do) WHEN Windows starts. ACPI driver in Win98 supports overriding of ACPI tables through the Registry.

    On 8/22/2023 at 5:18 PM, defuser said:

    I have to turn off the PC with the button (After the inscription "It`s now safe to turn off your computer.").

    1. mercury did the patch to win.com to run additional software on exiting from Windows which in turn can power off PC

    2. without any patch you can do the same thing just running above mentioned software in MS-DOS Mode

    n.b. - both questions are offtopic for this thread

    p.s. I edited my previous post

  6. On 8/23/2023 at 12:23 AM, Joaquim said:

    if i use an external disk 500GB's the Explorer is rebooted

    1. Try to access drive from other file manager - far, total comander or else.

    2. Is this drive accessible on the same PC from other OS like XP?

    5 hours ago, awkduck said:

    I don't know that you need it for USB.

    RLoew did 64-bit LBA patch for SCSI and I wrote driver for the same (USB drives are SCSI from protocol view point), but 500GB drive has to use 32-bit LBA and does not need any patch by default.

  7. https://github.com/LordOfMice/Tools/blob/master/rmmremove.zip

    Utilities for removing "bad" DOS (RMM - Real Mode Mapper) drive
    letters for Windows 9x.

    Some analogue of "dlmanip delete" for DOS.

    Contents:

    RMMFLRM.VXD
    Delete phantom floppy drive letters.

    RMMBADRM.VXD
    Removal of USB drive letters processed by BIOS and visible as a duplicate
    under Windows 9x after Hand Off for USB controller.

    RMMLTRRM.VXD & RMMLTRRM.REG
    Remove any drive letter, including both boot and system letters 
    (if you want to check this), not automatically,
    but by arbitrary list in the registry (RMMLTRRM.REG).
     

    N.B. These tools really delete drive letters, not just masking in Explorer:

     

  8. >https://thestarman.pcministry.com/asm/mbr/mystery.htm

    >but one of our readers finally pointed out that Microsoft did provide a "partial description of the meaning [of these bytes] in KB article 192606 (or the file: MBtFAQ)."

    JFYI, I am this reader ;)

    And I know slightly more, of course - the real IOS structure that used for passing these values (signatures and checksums).

     

    >Can you detail which cases?

    Excerpt from your link:

    >or the first word after the boot code is non-zero, IOS will instead store a checksum of the MBR and the INT 13h unit number, rather than the MBR signature.

    And as checksum include NT Disk Signature too -> we have unique value of this checksum.

     

    >But during setup?

    I don't see how this can affect setup too (as you), but NT Disk Signature has some impact on Windows 9x.

     

    P.S. And what it looks like in reality (with MBR code from NT):

    int13 = 80h, signature = E6FFB000h, checksum = F601BDECh, flags = 0001h
    int13 = 81h, signature = E6FFB000h, checksum = BDE79504h, flags = 0001h
    int13 = 82h, signature = E6FFB000h, checksum = E6233B84h, flags = 0001h

    Win9x signatures are equal, but checksums are different (and IOS is using checksums (flags = 0001h))

     

×
×
  • Create New...