Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by i430VX
-
-
2 hours ago, NoNameNeeded said:
Kind of pointless, since nothing is installed.
It seems to download some stuff to a temp folder which is deleted after the process finishes but no installed browser anywhere.
It is working completely fine for me in my non-conclusive testing.
Please explain:
-your system (particularly OS, user privelege level, system drive, and program directory) configuration
-build(s) you tried to install
-whether or not you can access http://o.rthost.win/ and http://rtfreesoft.blogspot.com/
and any other details of note.
I need more details to help you.0 -
Introducing Version 4.00 Preview 1 Fix 1 of my Unofficial Roytam1 Browser Installer!
Change log: -Development is fully shifted to version 4 branch.
-Changed old references from "Interlink" to "MailNews"
-Updated Roytam1's hosting domain
-Fixed archive naming issue with MailNews/BorealisAs always, you can get it here: http://i430vx.net/files/XP/RoyTam%20Browser%20Installer.exe
2 -
RMClock is really cool. Pun intended. I may use it on some systems that dont even neccesarily need it, in the future.
0 -
HFSLIP looks like it is for slipstreaming. I've already got 2000 installed. Unless I'm understanding it wrong?
Also, I am having issues finding KB919521.0 -
Hello. Recently, I got windows 2000 SP4 installed on my ThinkPad T60. I got the drivers taken care of. I also installed IE6. I suppose my usual updating method is no good here for 2 reasons... Supposedly Update Rollup 1 breaks multicore CPU support, and Windows Update does not work anymore.
So, basically... I'm wondering what is the best way to get my install fully updated? There is a LOT of options, apparently.
0 -
Introducing version 4.00 preview 1!
-added credits page
-integrated changes by InterLinked (MSFN user Dylan Cruz)
-fixed bug with "quit and install nothing" option
More still to come before release!
This is a test build, with the changes just "slapped in there". I don't have time to test extensively as I am packing for a trip, but It is availible here: http://i430vx.net/files/rtb4test.exe0 -
Very cool! I think I'll get a chance in these next couple of days to look at the code. Thanks for your improvements, I will likely implement them.
0 -
Hello all. This post will be "more official" later, but I want to start my own thread for this project of mine, so news and details don't get lost in the main RT1 threads.
I will soon be bringing my browser installer up to "modern times" and renovating it to support all active/semiactive RT1 browser releases.
Also will be combing through and attempting to find any feature requests that were made in the past. From now on, please put such feature requests here.1 -
On 6/29/2020 at 7:19 PM, cov3rt said:
( i think from 0.8.6e and newer, they require SSE2 based cpus?, but i don't know if this is true or not )
2.xx branch is the last fully working for SSE CPUs. 3.0x worked, partially: Only command-line VLC interface. 0.8.6e sounds familiar though, perhaps that was the last for non-sse CPUs?
0 -
I can't speak with regard to most other countries, but I've heard that (relatively) unregulated recycling markets (like in United States) leads to trouble. I guess that would explain why my school had a fake recycling program for several years, all of it just going into the trash, but getting a tax credit anyway. Similarly, the curbside recycling program here recently got gutted, only accepting paper, cardboard, clear glass, tin/alum cans, and #1/#2 plastic. I guess the rest isn't as profitable, so they don't bother, because nobody is making them bother. However, our state seems to have an awesome e-waste program. Most towns seem to have municipal drop-off points, and a nearby e-waste company is able to recycle an absolutely ridiculous amount of things. I know someone who worked closely with that e-waste company, it's all really recycled, too!
1 -
At least on my systems, it was a "recommended" update. Still, ludicrous rating for what it is, completely optional software.
You may benefit from verifying that this checkbox is unchecked in Windows Update settings.
1 -
59 minutes ago, Jody Thornton said:
Well it seems any day now (though likely September 2020), the Polymer 2 will be the ONLY way to view YouTube. What is the consensus on this? I don't use XP, but I was using Pale Moon and it will also be affected. What are the plans of many of you moving forward?
I will hold onto the old one for dear life. When they finally rip it away I will probably still (though nearly unbearably, nothing has separation, and very slow) use normal YouTube some, but explore alternative youtube "shell" sites. (there was one that doesn't look too great in appearance but is incredibly lightweight, the name escapes me)
0 -
1 hour ago, RainyShadow said:
Yes.
It fails for all browsers, not just basilisk.
...
Extracting archive: P:\Temp\_shared\bnavigator.win32-20200523-53da04b4-uxp-4d373c1d3-xpmod.7z
--
Path = P:\Temp\_shared\bnavigator.win32-20200523-53da04b4-uxp-4d373c1d3-xpmod.7z
Type = 7z
Physical Size = 31044163
Headers Size = 2162
Method = LZMA2:24 BCJ
Solid = +
Blocks = 2Everything is Ok
Folders: 14
Files: 92
Size: 86866056
Compressed: 31044163
P:\Temp\_shared\RTBInst>move /Y borealis "C:\Program Files\borealis\"
The system cannot find the path specified.
0 file(s) moved.XXMkLink ver 1.00 (c)2005 Copyright Pixelab, Inc.
The shortut created as follows
...
The error is in the mkdirXXX.bat files.
cd "%programfiles%" don't change the active drive. Since my %temp% and %programfiles% are on different drives, this just fails.
^(F!@##n forum soft...)
Also, it would be nice if it allows different install folder. My browsers go in E:\Programs\
interesting. for now i can offer no workarounds, but i shall try to work different drive support into a future release of the installer.
0 -
2 hours ago, RainyShadow said:
btw. your unofficial installer fails to move the extracted files here. It just does download > extract > *fail* > create shortcut to missing file.
Are you running under admin privileges? Let me try it out myself and see what happens.
UPDATE: I was unable to replicate the issues you tell of. "Works on my machine," as they say.
If you are running it with admin-level privileges, then please delete any "basiliskia32" folder that may exist in the program files folder, as NTFS permissions can be "touchy". Presuming there was such a folder and you deleted it, then try again and it should work.0 -
27 minutes ago, win32 said:
These were the drivers I was thinking of:
Released December 2002, so they reference the earlier R200 cards like the Radeon 9000. But your card was released in July 2004. Maybe there were minor changes that could have made the older drivers unusable?
Yet, since it boots to a blank screen instead of producing a blue screen or just not starting with one of the user-mode components complaining about the lack of EnumDisplayMonitors, I thought that somehow that one would work better with Windows 95 than drivers from 2003 or 4.
I cannot specifically remember versions i tried. Sometime I'll throw the card back in a win95 box and get back to you on if it works or not with that one.
0 -
2 hours ago, win32 said:
The ATi Radeon 8500 works in Windows 95 according to @LoneCrusader, and apparently the same applies for the Radeon 9200. I'd like to say that 7xxx/8xxx/9000/9200/9500/9700 Radeons work, since they are listed as compatible with supposedly 95-compatible drivers from 2002.
But my Mobility Radeon 7500 just boots to a blank screen with any 95-compatible driver installed.
Maybe i didnt find the right driver but my radeon 9250 never worked on my win95C machine. drivers couldnt start or didnt install.
0 -
1 hour ago, RainyShadow said:
Is there a SSE build of NM28XP? Or anything else newer than NM27.9.7?
Well, that is new. I suspect you mean a brwoser based on a more recent engine. You could try the IA32 build of Serpent, but as far as I know there is no dice for NM28.
0 -
Thank you, it did install.
Either, it doesnt actually work, or I cannot figure out how to use add-ons in RZ. I notice the lack of an about:addons page, and it doesnt show up in the only other place i could think of, the about:plugins page.0 -
Does anyone have a solution for installing browser add-ons? Currently RZ complains about not being able to validate add-on signing.
0 -
I'm not sure about the other part, but the GX620 should be based on the Intel 945 chipset. That should have an ICH6-based SATA disk drive controller.
0 -
Thank you, @Dave-H!
Replacing the DLL worked!
1 -
It has "just worked" for me...
Do you have WMP9URP Installed? I've heard that it is incompatible with the WMP10 9x edition; You're only supposed to install one or the other on a machine.0 -
Does there happen to be a xx2 matching u251? (u252)
If there is, I'd be interested in trying that.0 -
No Dice, on this "fresh" machine either, as far as the web-plugins go. Seems like maybe we have beat the Java 8 horse all that we can.
0
Unoffical Roytam1 Browser Installer - Project Thread
in Software Hangout
Posted
It *should* be in the program files folder [basiliskx86 (or basiliskx64 if you chose the x64 build)] and there *should* be a shortcut to the browser on your desktop. Are either of those happening?