Jump to content

cc333

Member
  • Posts

    594
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United States

Posts posted by cc333

  1. On 8/17/2020 at 5:32 PM, win32 said:

    And now, in the U.S., most commercials for services promote them as mobile-only (we're on Google Play and the Apple Honourable Supreme Ruler Tim Cook App Store, but if you just have a PC, get lost). Even those where proper URLs are given, they are often typed in on smartphones. Sometimes laptops. Desktop computers are no longer acknowledged in North American marketing, even for computers themselves.

    I have to agree with this.  WAY too much emphasis on smartphones nowadays!  This has been a growing trend since at least 2013, it's really gotten out of hand in the past three or so years (particularly the emphasis on social media such as Facebook and Twitter;  the more people flock to those platforms, the more inclined I am to stay away from them).

    I'm beginning to feel like the world as we knew it before the mega-corporate info snatchers came along (Facebook, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft, to name a few) is forever ruined.

    This, of course, probably isn't true.  I'm just being cynical.

    Be that as it may, there are many modern commercials I don't like.

    Go back about 20 years though, and they start getting better (the farther back you go, the better they get in general, although every era has its fair share of flops).  I remember not liking many of them much then, but after being bombarded by the junk that has come along in the 20 years since, I've warmed up to them considerably :crazy:

    c

  2. 1 hour ago, ED_Sln said:

    Which version of WUMT? Works on XP 20.12.2016, 07.01.2020 works only on W10.

    20.12.2016.

    1 hour ago, ED_Sln said:

    Edit: I checked it in VMWare and on real hardware, it works both there and there. Applied registry tweak to enable POSReady, works well too.

    OK, so that's not the problem.  That's good!

    Perhaps I should re-download wsusscn2.cab?  Maybe the certificate somehow got stripped out altogether?

    Anyway, I'll look into it tomorrow.  It's late here in shake 'n  bake California :zzz::no:

    c

  3. 29 minutes ago, ED_Sln said:

    I tested it on XP RUS SP3 Pro VL.

    You need to install Windows Update Agent 7.6.7600.256.

    Hmm, I thought I had?  I guess it won't hurt to reinstall....

    I'll give it a try and see what happens.

    EDIT:  I reinstalled WU Agent 7.6.7600.256, and no change.  WUMT is throwing the same error.

    EDIT #2:  I'm not sure if this matters, but this is Win XP Pro x86 installed on a VMware Fusion VM on my macOS machine.

    EDIT #3:  And it has the POS Ready 2009 patch applied.

    c

  4. Does anyone have a link to the latest working version of wsusscn2.cab?

    I have a copy I downloaded, but I don't know if it is valid, as I can't seem to get it to work on XP 32-bit (WUMT shows error 0x800B0100: No signature was present in the subject;  don't know if this is related to the lack of sha1 certificate).  I did get this same wsusscn2.cab to work on XP x64, for what it's worth.

    c

  5. @dencorso Make that two, for I use Windows and MacOS interchangeably all the time :)

    You just never hear about it from me, because FAT32 is enough for most of my file copying needs, and read-only NTFS is adequate for the rest.

    Plus, there exists a read-only HFS+ driver for Windows XP and up which can help too, and one doesn't need to be running Windows on a Mac to enjoy it, for all you need to do is install two .sys files (four if installing on x64) plus a few registry entries to enable it on any PC running a supported Windows version.

    Link

    c

  6. I may've asked this before, but can someone help me get Pot Player working?

    I've tried on 32-bit XP and 64-bit XP, and in both cases, it complains that some DLL has been modified, and it won't start.  My impression is that, at least on 32-bit, it should "just work."  Is that correct?

    c

  7. 8 minutes ago, Dave-H said:

    You're trying to use the later version, which only runs on Windows 10 apparently!
    See earlier posts.
    :)

    I thought I had downloaded that version, but apparently I didn't;  I accidentally re-downloaded the Win10-only version :/

    So, I went back and got the proper version this time, and it's at least starting now!

    So, now let's see if it'll see updates properly....

    c

  8. I guess this?

    49 minutes ago, Matt A. Tobin said:

    BTW Have I mentioned you are in direct violation of the Mozilla Public License 2.0?

    Specifically, Section 3.2 which states:

    Quote

    3.2 If You distribute Covered Software in Executable Form then:

      a. such Covered Software must also be made available in Source Code Form, as described in Section 3.1, and You must inform recipients of the Executable Form how they can obtain a copy of such Source Code Form by reasonable means in a timely manner, at a charge no more than the cost of distribution to the recipient; and

    The MPL defines Source Code Form as follows:

    Quote

    1.13. “Source Code Form”

      means the form of the work preferred for making modifications.

    Your patch files are not sufficient. You MUST provide the full source code with your modifications. All software created with covered code I have worked on is currently in breach of the license.

    Seems like this was declared rather suddenly?  I mean, if @roytam1 was in violation of these clauses since the start of his "New Moon for XP" project at least 2 years ago, why wait until now to say so?

    c

  9. 7 hours ago, IntMD said:

    It seems to be up once again

    Confirmed!

     

    7 hours ago, IntMD said:

    but for how long though?

    Well, it will be permanently offline eventually, but when that will happen is anyone's guess...

     

    7 hours ago, IntMD said:

    Might be the best moment to reverse engineer this s*** while it's still alive, and mirror updates that haven't been archived yet in any form.

    Agreed.  I know there has been an attempt at reverse engineering WU v4 for use with Windows 9x and ME, but I don't think it has gotten far.

    Fortunately, though, in anticipation, many updates have already been archived in various languages, so not all is lost, but it would definitely be a shame if updates for some of the less common languages get lost to time.

    c

  10. On 8/2/2020 at 3:25 PM, Dave-H said:

    The late great Rudolph Loew produced a "TRIM" program which works in DOS!

    Well there you go!

    If he can do that, why can't someone write a similar tool which runs within Windows NT (instead of DOS) and operates on NTFS?  The basic operating principles can't be too much different, can they?  In other words, TRIM is TRIM, regardless of OS or filesystem, because it's an intrinsic function of the drive itself.

    c

  11. I find it somewhat odd that no one has yet made a generic TRIM support package which is XP compatible and works with all SSDs.

    Surely the protocols are standardized enough for this to be theoretically possible?

    Unfortunately, I don't presently have the knowledge to make such a thing happen, but someone around here must?

    c

  12. On 7/24/2020 at 7:07 PM, roytam1 said:

    New build of Serpent/UXP for XP!

    Test binary:

    ...

    IA32 Win32 https://o.rths.ml/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.6.win32-git-20200725-4d76d4e-uxp-1e0bb1d35-xpmod-ia32.7z

    source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32

    Does "IA32 Win32" mean it will run on non-SSE2 CPUs?

    By the way, which one of these represents the Serpent 55.x branch?  The logic w/re how versioning works here is escaping me somewhat at the moment (not enough sleep :zzz:)

    c

  13. 7 hours ago, loblo said:

    I think Burp allocates a max of a little less than 100kB/s bandwith per connection.

    Huh, interesting.  In that case, is there a setting somewhere which can change that allocation?  Or maybe some lines in the source code (if available)?

    My home connection gets at best ~350kB/s anyway, so it's not likely to hurt me much, but it would nevertheless be nice to know if it can be somehow changed.

    c

  14. 32 minutes ago, schwups said:

    The connection via Burp reaches a little less than 100 KByte, here. The pages are loading perceptible slower.

    To alleviate this problem somewhat, it is possible for Burp to be run on another PC which is configured as a proxy server to the Win98 PC?

    I ask because it's possible that the slowness is due to the Win98 networking stack's inherent architectural inefficiencies, which are being exacerbated by running Burp via Java 8 on KernelEx.

    c

  15. It often amazes me how easily some of you find such hard to find files!

    These ones, of course, aren't obscure by any means, but they have nevertheless been rendered quite hard to find since Intel apparently took them offline, and most of the "driver-finder" sites link back to Intel's copy of the files it seems. *sigh*...

    A few weeks ago, I tried to find Windows XP Intel Management Engine drivers for a laptop of mine (Dell Latitude D630C), and couldn't (most everything was for 7 and up).  Ended up not mattering though,a s I simply turned the ME off, and the missing devices disappeared :)

    OK, enough thread hijacking.  Carry on!

    c

  16. 6 hours ago, Jody Thornton said:

    ...you can't EVER ask advice or questions without Moon-Matt and their minions biting your head off.

    That's too bad, for I've seen examples of when Matt Tobin actually can be decent (the thread about finding permanent names for roytam1's browsers, for example).

    I think it's just that, for whatever reason, he seems to get impatient very easily and apparently has a bit of a temper.

    6 hours ago, Jody Thornton said:

    because Matt Tobin is VERY talented - he really is.  I think Interlink is a TERRIFIC mail client.

    6 hours ago, Dibya said:

    Rather Giving Matt Tobin credit for mail client , give it to Seamonkey team who made that stuff and matt just went out to port it to UXP

    Even so, Seamonkey's email client is integrated within the browser suite, and it is nice to have it as a standalone program à la Thunderbird for those who don't want the whole SM suite just for the email client, so we can give him credit for that, if nothing else.

    Anyway, my main OS is macOS 10.13 from 2017 right now, and Polymer 2 is in no danger of being unsupported there.  However, I do still dabble with NT5.x (and do occasionally use it as my primary OS, depending on need), so it'd be nice to have a browser there which supports it and isn't sponsored by either Google or the Chinese government (I don't trust Chrome or its China-based derivatives to respect any privacy settings whatever, at least not without extraordinary means;  other Chromium-derived browsers (such as modern Opera) are probably OK, but none of those run on NT5 to my knowledge, so....).

    I dunno, maybe I'll give one of the Chinese chromiums a try, for they might not be as bad as I'm fearing they are w/re privacy (or maybe it's more easily manageable via HOSTS or other such tweaks than I'm thinking?).  So to that end, which ones of the lot are most current and recommended?

    c

  17. 27 minutes ago, dencorso said:

    No, you aren't.

    Thought so!  I like to know what I'm using, how it works and why, so I'm glad I figured it out successfully in this case!

    Anyway, back to the topic at hand (sorta), I use Transmission on Mac all the time, as it is the only BT client I've used (for Mac, anyway) whose UI is sensible and easy to use.  i knew it also supported Linux, but until today, I didn't know (or had forgotten) that there was a Windows port that ran on XP/Vista!

    c

  18. @dencorso Agreed.  Just because the latest release is no longer compatible with XP, doesn't mean that the last release that is won't suddenly stop working (we've seen some rather unscrupulous examples of that elsewhere over the 6 or so years since XP's "official" EoS).

    My understanding is that, while Bittorrent has added new features to its protocols over the years since it was introduced, the basic architecture is more or less the same, and virtually all clients, new and old, can still connect to it just fine, just without the advanced features of newer versions.  Unless I'm missing something?

     

    On 5/27/2020 at 12:20 PM, dencorso said:

    ...full-body velostat gimp-suit...

    With all the paranoia surrounding the coronavirus lately, this is actually becoming a real life phenomena, something I never thought would happen!  (I kid you not, I recently came across a headline (from a reputable source) that stated that some people are *wearing hazmat suits on airplanes* because of the extreme fear of acquiring the virus!)  While i won't be stupid and go put myself in a situation where I'd be infected, I'm not going to live in that kind of fear.  Same applies to old Windows and software.  While I will use newer, safer software when appropriate (online shopping, banking transactions, etc.), I'm not going to stop using XP, Vista or 7 (or any software thence developed) simply because MS isn't releasing patches for them anymore!

    Enough said.

    c

×
×
  • Create New...