Mcinwwl
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Mcinwwl
-
-
Machine might have 'Windows installation' mode in BIOS. Can't promise you much, but in my case I could use USB 3.0 on windows 7 before installing drivers with this setting on.
0 -
Name your topic after the question you are trying to find answer for, and:
a) more people will be likely to read it and help you,
b) mods might magically move your topic to desired subsection if necessary with ease
0 -
So I thing I'll try to find time to post on their forums. I can get away with updates (POSRedy updates are not an official way, I get they might don't want to support them), I know how PUP is wrapped within installers and how to mitigate it, but a problem with scanner effects directly my relatives, and I don't want to be called by person for every document scanning :/
0 -
Here harkaz has his topic.
0 -
You won't get any refund
0 -
So Time Zone in Punta Arenas is changed... this is not the world I knew any more...
0 -
I came here only to confirm that I got my POSReady patches and Office 2007 patches (14 files total) in about 2 hours. No errors noticed so far.
1 -
In terms of dollars M$ is bathing in, 5 million is more a giggle than a strike, isn't it?
0 -
48 minutes ago, jaclaz said:
A good question would be whether on average a PC is kept in use more or less than a game console.
I would instinctively say that gamers tend to renew their hardware far more often than "normal" users, but does the same applies to consoles?
It was 7 years for the previous console generation before their heir came to being (I do not count Nintendo - it's different world).
There ate many techies among gamers, that upgrade their units every year or so, and they are usually the loudest, arguing about points in benchmarks for their favourite Franchise or build. And, probably, marketing and Gaming/PC media are trying to make you think that gaming is all about buying new hardware for the sake of few frames more. But there are still many people playing on their middle-level PCs for years. Speaking the language of statistics, the average gamer most probably spend more money on parts and buy them more often, but the median and the mod, I guess, is about the same.
59 minutes ago, jaclaz said:And - set apart a few kids - how much time is a game console in use (more or less than a "common" PC)?
Well, new Xbox and PS is a fully functional media center, with cable-television ability, VOD and internet streaming apps, torrent clients and various other uses. So most probably 'less' in most cases, but it can be used nearly 24/7 by someone, who is rarely playing.
0 -
4 hours ago, jaclaz said:
To be picky (as I am) not exactly, if you do not throw thousands of photos, games, etc., you can buy a smaller SSD, the problem does not arise when you throw a lot of data on the SSD (that's the actual reason why it is made), it is when you continuously overwrite those data.
Truly, thanks for pointing this out. I did a small correction to the post, should be a bit better right now. I originally thought about games, cos the new ones can download a gigabytes worth with small gap between each update (Quantum Break for Xbox One had an update that was bigger than original game - which meant redownloading all audio, textures, videos etc. plus a small fix, over 60 GB. And yeah, I know we are talking about Windows PC, but Xbox can have SSD, too. And since Windows 10 offer cross-play with Xbox One with UWP-packed games from windows store, this is worth remembering. And we need to remember, that little publishers care about publishing their games polished, so this might become standard... ok, enough :>).
0 -
On 31.03.2017 at 1:15 PM, Radish said:
Also how is the page file managed on an SSD? Going by what you are saying my view that there might be multiple forced writes to the same "cells" isn't what happens in practice.
Works as pagefile on HDD - will write something on the disk, when system or program will decide it's necessary. And, AFAIK, it will be stored on SDD following the same logic, which simplified model was provided by jaclaz, not any sort of special file that tries to wear specific cell of.
So you should be rather concerned by overall data writes along time, not specific files or partitions.
Bigger capacity, improved reliability, and long endurance of 200TB TBW(total bytes written), the drive could be used over 10 years with daily usage of 20GB - taken from the ADATA specs you've linked.
Unless you'll continuously throw thousands of photos, games, movies, databases, (anything that needs lot of storage), you should be fine with the hardware for years. There are, of course, rare occurrences, when specific programs has bad impact on SSD's, but if you'll keep some common sense you shouldn't be struck by sudden loss.
https://www.extremetech.com/computing/239268-spotify-may-killing-ssd
http://www.msfn.org/2016/09/27/adjust-setting-firefox-wears-ssd-drive/
0 -
6 hours ago, niko32 said:
I just wanted to point that at most cases common sense is the best defense.
This is not a solution, since it is a computer for relatives, not for me
1 -
Ooooh, leave XP's with their beauty of pixelosis. Real fonts have corners!
0 -
Below You'll have a review of ADATA SSD that interests you (512 GB variant, but this shouldn't be much concern). Polish only, but hey, we have translators, and article contains lots of comparison bar charts about speed of different SSDs under different circumstances, that are self-explanatory, I hope.
Can't say about partitioning of SSDs, I use my GoodRam Iridium Pro it as a single partition OS drive. Only drawback I can recall is that SSD's tend to slow down when filled up, but I can't find up to date data about this ad-hoc (this article form 2013 might be slightly outdated.
https://www.howtogeek.com/165542/why-solid-state-drives-slow-down-as-you-fill-them-up/
0 -
I had to wait for more than 12 hours to see the updates. The thing is, Wu on XP has some problems with Avast! on my machine, so I have disabled all the IS programs, and this PC is used by my family members. And I needed to bail out of home at the time, hoping nothing bad will happen. But finally I got 'em all, including Office 2007 updates.
@FranceBB I think You have said you are in touch with Avast! devs and that you are aware of problems, that this software has on XP. Are they planning to fix em? I don't really expect them to do anything in favor of POSReady updates, since they are not a part of XP (officially), but Avast! turned on prevents me from scanning a document, and this is a serious issue for me. Already thinking of changing the AV solution on my PC...
0 -
Bersaglio, you have saved my eyes. Thanks !
BTW might be worth punning on MFSN frontpage ^^
0 -
If they won't wipe any of the phones told to be hacked, it means it was a hoax from the very beginning... If they will, internet will be loud about it.
0 -
Additionally, lot of Android code is written in Java.
0 -
Direct link to English version (2.0):
http://h20564.www2.hp.com/hpsc/swd/public/detail?sp4ts.oid=412123&swItemId=lj_24947_4&swEnvOid=228
Site where I got it:
http://h20564.www2.hp.com/hpsc/swd/public/readIndex?sp4ts.oid=412123&swLangOid=8&swEnvOid=228
I didn't test it.
0 -
Cool. so I won't have security updates, if I don't have newest systems... makes sense.
0 -
This article (polish only, sorry):
http://www.fixitpc.pl/topic/49-zabezpieczenia-robaczywe-ataki-poslaniec/
Describes SMB and corresponding ports as a threat to the 2000/XP/2003. Although it is based on old data (see last post update) it describes things somehow similar to the ones corresponding to the bug patched by M$ this week, i mean RCE using SMB. Post do not say, which SMB it is, but I guess that v1.0 is what will appear in older systems
If you are paranoid and do not share files, folders and printers over network, simply block the corresponding ports. If you are just cautious, just be sure to hide your LAN behind router and follow most common good practices (do not open shady sites and files etc.) and you should be fine. You are not worth being APT target
1 -
1 hour ago, Roffen said:
That's what I have thought as well. I don't remember why I suspected it was a ActiveX problem but I must have sen a message or something.
It might be simpler that expected - maybe you have accidentally chosen to always block ActiveX formants on Windows Update site when prompted?
Also, your Internet Security, antivirus or whatever protective software might cause problem with windows update. My Avast! does not only cause Windows update troubles, I also have to disable it while scanning.
1 hour ago, Roffen said:But what I found is that none of the two Brother printers I have connected to that machine would print
Are you sure you have installed the same hardware driver for browser that worked previously? Maybe you should look for old CD with printer drivers you might have somewhere, or dive deep into the internet to look for other driver version. But beware of bad bloatware sites!
0 -
2 hours ago, dencorso said:
Nobody reads my posts... snif!
Sorry
I'll make that up.
Anyway, you say that Silverlight more or less works despite not being supported for IE8/XP, right? Or do I miss some information from other sources?
0 -
https://www.microsoft.com/getsilverlight/get-started/install/
Do I get it right, no more Silverlight updates for IE8/XP/POSReady 2009?
If so, we might need to suggest everyone to uninstall the crap?
0
POSReady 2009 updates ported to Windows XP SP3 ENU
in Windows XP
Posted
Programs written in language that is based on .NET Framework will require .NET Framework. Security updates... well, patch known vulnerabilities
According to @heinoganda's revelations, these are hotfixes fixing something broken in previous .NET updates. If you are not using stop-computer cmdlet in Powershell (and if you are outside of corporate network and don't know what 'powershell' is, this is rather unlikely) you most probably won't notice that changes provided.
.NET is a base for more and more programs for Windows (for example, popular password Manager KeePass2 requires .NET framework to run). However, of you don't use any .NET based program, you might uninstall it completely - which might not be that easy, to track down which dependency every of your programs require.
Personally, I uninstalled .NET 1.1 Framework on XP, no more updates are being provided, and I failed to install any available POSReady updates into it. And I don't think I have ever used .NET 1.1 based program o_O.
A base for digital signatures and internet encryption. They have their own expiration dates, and some are being revoked if stolen or published by authority that later appeared., eh, slicky. Not to dig deep into it's theory, it's worth to have them updated.
Windows has it's own certificate storage, but other programs, f. e. Firefox browser, have their own as well.