Jump to content

bigmuscle

Patron
  • Posts

    1,758
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    7
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Czech Republic

Everything posted by bigmuscle

  1. I know someone already mentioned this but I don't know what "themepack". I always thought that Windows theme is packed into "msstyles" file which my library has been intended for.
  2. You should also realize that the account has not been blocked just due to one mistakely released private version. This step has been taken as reaction to many users' ignorance and behaviour during the whole time of development of my software. If you look into past, you can see situations when I released private version to donators only and someone immediately publish it in different forum - not "by mistake", but intentionally to disrespect my work. Look... I spend a a lot of my free time to develop this software, it is sometimes very difficult to make it fully work and the result -> users complain "2 days and no update"... I write "do not install into Program Files" -> users install into Program Files and complain that it does not work ... I write "it is only debug beta for preview" and users complain that it is not fully usable and debug tools annoy them... I write "you are not allow to publish" and what is the result? Yes, users publish it. So why are they wondering when there are made steps against their ignorance?
  3. DarkKnight: yes, the archive contains only DWMGlass.dll which is complete and fully functional implementation of my Aero Glass. The fact that the archive does not contain installer and user must install/load DLL on its own does not change anything. And even the "completeness" is not absolutely important at all, because the copyright applies even to the parts of the work. I already mentioned this earlier, so just for repetition. Yes, when you are not logged it, the statement is not displayed and you can download only PUBLIC releases. I have no problem if this public release appears somewhere. The problem is that the incriminated version was not public and required login (and thus the statement was displayed).
  4. DarkKnight: no, there is no such code. There is also no code in the software to identify the user, the software does not even interact with "me" in any way. There is only a small signature in debug versions which profile the file was downloaded from. As to the rules, it is not about MY rules. The rules are simply given by the copyright law which forbids any distribution without the permissions. And even though the user is explicitely informed about this fact on the website, he simply ignored the statement and distributed my software publicly.
  5. I'm working on the solution and the implementation to avoid similar malfunction in the future.
  6. Sorry, but I don't see any contradiction. If software is available for free by its author, it does not mean that it belongs to you, that you are allowed to do anything you want with it, and that you don't have to respect any rules.
  7. I am not sure what can be clearer, but you should shot whole page next time (but of course, statement is visible only when you are logged in, but you needed it to be logged in to download that published build):
  8. Just for clarification... I would have absolutely no problem if it is just a link to my website. Now you have edited the page to have a link only, but before, the file was attached directly to the forum post (as seen in my screenshot "Attached files" ... 1476 ) and it could be downloaded directly from that forum. (and yes, files downloaded from my website contain a signature and I didn't block you based on your nick/logo. I just blocked the account which the published file's signature matches to). And your "2nd" is not true. When you are logged in (b1476 required login), Download page clearly states "You are not allowed to publish pre-release/private builds anywhere. If it happens, your account will be disabled".
  9. Sure. But maybe he is someone else - just with the same nickname, logo and even the files downloaded using your profile. Such a coincidence.
  10. Your account has been blocked for violation copyright rules.
  11. It is not good solution, because it does not add you automatically to the database, so you would need to wait until I am at my home computer and I do it manually, so it can take longer time. It would be better to figure out what settings I need to enable to allow your donation.
  12. Hello, I am not aware that there is some settings in PayPal account that disallows donations from other countries. I cannot even find anything in there. If somebody knows I can set it up, but the majority of the donations comes from foreign countries. Is there someone who has similiar problem?
  13. No, there are no intended optimizations except that the default buffer sizes are a little bit larger. But the rendering goes through a little bit different paths on v1809 so maybe it has an impact.
  14. We cannot help you if you are not able to read my previous post.
  15. CarteNoir: I suggest to run "regsvr32 /u DWMGlass.dll" from command line (as admin) before uninstalling.
  16. Pjertan: I know what you mean, but could you try without Aero Glass? I noticed that winver 1809 always shows some weird graphics there.
  17. Is there written something incomprehensible on the website?
  18. I've pinned this topic until it is fixed, so others with the same problem know about it.
  19. Thanks. Whole problem lies in Microsoft Win8.1+ (and higher) bug (errr, they called it "feature by design"), that it does not report all CPU-supported features when Hyper-V is enabled (i.e. when Hyper-V is disabled, it reports "Skylake-based processors", but when Hyper-V is enabled, it reports "Core 2 Duo 8000 series"). I will try to develop some workaround but I must ensure that it does not influence backward-compatibility.
  20. I updated LicensingTool a bit. Could you redownload and provide CPU part of the output (before and after)? http://glass8.eu/out/LicensingTool.7z
  21. Thank you, at least now I know where the problem lies :-) I will try to find the easy solution.
  22. Deleting the Symbols folder is always the good hint (and reboot - Retry button does not always work as expected). If it does not help, the reason of failure can be found in debug.log (if verbose logging is enabled - see guide).
  23. Is it possible to get output from this utility before and after Hyper-V install? http://glass8.eu/out/LicensingTool.zip
  24. maicol07: the code works but it seems that Firefox 61 is totally buggy. It sometimes does not load userChrome.css at all, sometimes works, sometimes does not show window at all. And the frame is corrupted (e.g. no borders, no resize...) even without any userChrome.css. Previous version has no problem. (you can also try it without that line @namespace ...) Also you can try this code: @namespace url("http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul"); @namespace html url("http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"); #main-window { background: none !important; -moz-appearance: -moz-win-glass !important; } .titlebar-button { background-color: transparent !important; transition: background-color 0.2s ease; height: 25px; } .titlebar-button > .toolbarbutton-icon { list-style-image: none; } .titlebar-button:hover { background-color: rgba(117, 167, 215, 0.6) !important; } #titlebar-close:hover { background-color: rgba(255, 220, 220, 0.4) !important; } #titlebar-close:hover > .toolbarbutton-icon { list-style-image: url("chrome://browser/skin/caption-buttons.svg#close-white") !important; }
×
×
  • Create New...