Jump to content

Meados

Member
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Portugal

Posts posted by Meados

  1. It worked! Thanks Dave!

    Unfortunately it looks as if you're going to have to do this the hard way!

    :(

    You need to remove all the evidence of the previous installations so the WMP9 installer can't see them.

    Cut and paste the Windows Media Player folder somewhere else away from within the Program Files folder.

    Also remove all the files beginning with "wmp" from your system32 folder, and back them up somewhere.

    Then open regedit, and find HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\MediaPlayer.

    Right click and save this key to a backup file. Then delete the original key.

    I would strongly advise this backing up process of the registry key and the WMP files, in case it all goes wrong and you have to restore the system back to as it was before. Just deleting them is a bit risky!

    Then reboot, and try the WMP9 installer again.

    With a bit of luck it will now work, and you'll have WMP9 back again.

    Then you can delete your backups!

    Good luck.

    Dave.

    :)

  2. Hi,

    I bought new PC (Lenovo X200) and now I'm setting Windows 2000 and other environment.

    Soon , I'll be able to develop again.

    I think that I'll create the portuguese version WMP10.

    Please translate the following attachment text to portuguese. and tell me the font face on your notepad.exe with Ansi .

    Ok, I translated it:

    Lucida Console -> Font

    Script -> Ocidental

    Download:

    tmpltwmp.txt

  3. I know this is a OLD thread but this is my response to all that are with the same doubt with a similar computer.

    In that computer?

    Windows 2000.. Definitely.

    Windows XP just lag and lag in system with less than 512 MB.. People just like that Windows too much, and nlite it to the max to make it run in computers with about 64 MB ram what I think it's comic.. Probably it will work, but if you install some bull**** program it will lag like hell.

    win2K is problematic with some old games.

    I don't think so.. Actually Windows 2000 have a compatible mode for .exe aplications like windows xp do.

    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/279792

    I have tested it with applications that only ran in Windows 98 and with this I was able to run them in Windows 2k.

    I also was with the same question 1 year ago.. People always said me that Windows XP is the best, run better, is more secure, more faster, more all..

    However I have used Windows 2000 in pcs at school (at long time), they had upgraded the pcs that were running Windows 98 smoothly but unstable. I remember when I use Windows 2k in there first time.. Never saw any more crash, never saw any ctrl + alt + del problem and applications run always smoothly that in Windows 98. The bad thing was the boot time that increased since windows 98.

    So I decided to run Windows 2000 in my system (P4 1.7, 256 MB ram, Nvidia Geforce 2 mx 400, 40 GB hdd). I was sick of Windows XP lagging.. I loved in that time that skin and gui. Never saw nothing similar before. :)

    When I tried Windows 2000 I have noted some positive points and some negative ones comparing with XP (this also includes recent points):

    + Stuff

    Windows 2000 eat much less ram than Windows XP (this is important in a 256 MB ram)

    Windows 2000 is more stable (at least my computer never needed a format after that)

    Windows 2000 only eats about 500 MB in a normal installation, while Windows XP eats about 3.5 GB.

    - Stuff

    Windows 2000 boot time is more than the double of the Windows XP*

    Windows 2000 can't run some applications especially mad for Windows XP and Vista**

    Windows 2000 don't have a basic theme customization that makes it ugly than Windows XP***

    This is my opinion. However actually the bad things with * can be improved:

    *

    -Windows 2000 boot time is more than the double of the Windows XP

    I have reduced the Windows 2000 boot time from 42 seconds to 38 seconds.. Its not a big difference yet, but probably can be improved replacing or tweaking some Windows 2000 boot files. Have a look here:

    http://www.msfn.org/board/Faster-Startup-F...20&start=20

    **

    -Windows 2000 can't run some applications especially mad for Windows XP and Vista

    Other thing that was actually been fixed by the member Windows2000 and his XP API for Windows 2000.Have a look here:

    http://www.msfn.org/board/KDW-FCWIN2K-t120936.html

    ***

    -Windows 2000 don't have a basic theme customization that makes it ugly than Windows XP

    Actually Windows 2000 can be more pretty than the default Windows XP. You can actually make it look like vista without eating much resources. (I am running this in Windows2k with 512 MB ram, with all active if you have a worst system you may need to deactivate some theme options) (don't forget to upgrade true transparency to latest version 0.9.4.0 since the version that come with vista pack is unstable)

    You can actually have transparency like in Vista, A task bar like vista, icons like vista, a Aero Skin, all system visually upgraded to look like this:

    desktop2k.PNG

    look here:

    http://www.msfn.org/board/Vistapack-25-released-t119468.html

  4. arcsetup.exe and arcldr.exe do appear to be required. I would attach the archive with all ntldr, NTDETECT.COM, arcsetup.exe, and arcldr.exe; but MSFN.org forums seems to limit attachment size to 200K (attachment would be like 303 KB).

    I think arcsetup.exe and arcldr.exe have something to do with ARC paths.

    For SCSI, Ntbootdd.sys is used. By default, Ntbootdd.sys is not installed when not necessary.

    I have that files, I can do the test of windows xp with windows 2000 boot files if you want.

  5. I have fixed the cpu problem with True Trans. I installed it (lateste version 0.9.4.0). And now it work like a charm without burning my cpu. :P

    Please update it in your pack.

    I am just wondering how to update my start menu, since the Tclock don't work in my system.

  6. Ok, I have tried with original ones of Ascii2 wheres the results:

    Windows 2000

    Original Files

    42 s

    Windows XP

    W/ 2000

    Didn't boot

    Final Results:

    Windows 2000

    Original Files

    42 s

    Windows XP

    W/ 2000

    Didn't boot

    Windows 2000

    W/ XP

    40 s

    Windows XP

    20 s

    Windows 2000

    W/ 2003

    38 s

    Windows XP

    W/ 2003

    20 s

    Please not that this can have some inaccuracy.

  7. I tried install media player 10 english, but now I can't unnistall and back to media player 9.. Any idea how to do that?

    Try this, as suggested on Win2000's blog.

    Run Win2000's WMP10 installer again.

    When the dialogue box "Detect Media Player 10, Delete it and continue?", comes up, hit OK.

    Let it finish, and then just cancel the install when the WMP10 installer splash screen come up.

    Worked for me, and I'm now back to WMP9 as before.

    :yes:

    Damm... That did something but not unnistalled it at all.. Everytime that I try open the install program, I receive the follow a message that it can isntall it because an error occured in installation, and to I restar the computer again, when I restar it shows me the same message, and now I don't have Windows Media Player.

    Hope that "Win2000" update the program and dll to work with other languages soon, I am interested in give any file to help him to dlls work in Portuguese windows 2000.

  8. This was one of functions that I feel more lack in windows 2000. However I found a program that can generate them similar like in Windows XP.

    Its called Xentient Thumbnails and it will replace original image link by a icon of image itself. It's very usefull..

    Developer site is down, however I have got it from an external site.

    Picture:

    xentient-thumbnails-screenshot2.jpg

    You can dowload it here:

    http://www.download3000.com/download_33890.html

    or here:

    http://rapidshare.com/files/143858018/thumbs.rar.html

  9. Ok where's my test of speed of booting.

    It's in same machine. However Windows XP is almost a clean install and Windows 2000 e full of programs.. About 76 in start menu.. (I don't believe that thsi affect boot time, but it's for you know)

    Windows 2000

    W/ XP

    40 s

    Windows XP

    20 s

    Windows 2000

    W/ 2003

    38 s

    Windows XP

    W/ 2003

    20 s

    So seems its about 2 seconds more fast booting Windows 2000 with Windows 2003 files. Windows XP with windows 2003 files I didn't noticed any difference. :|

    I don't have the original Windows 2000 files, so if someone want to send them to me, so I can test the speed with normal booting to compare with Windows 2003 and XP version would be nice.

  10. Meados I've sent you a PM with links to my Windows 2003 startup files.

    I just wish they worked for me!

    :no:

    They work like a charm for me! And my language of windows is different.

    It runs more faster than Windows XP ones. Seems my Windows 2000 startup is with same speed of Windows XP startup, or at least its very close. (I will do time count to see the perfomance of both boottimes)

    I also tried to bot Windows XP with windows 2003 files, but I didn't noted any difference.

  11. ofcourse it works, but now certain strings in your files will be in english, instead of portuges...

    outlook is not able to display more colors then that, sorry :(

    vistatheme without true ttransparency? no.

    for taskbar, install tclock3 , but be warned... its beta software

    and no, it cant be centered. else i would have done it dude :P

    thank m$ for those restrictions...

    Ok, the portuguese files are here: (damm I hope them are not patched :S)

    http://rapidshare.com/files/143590588/pt.zip.html

    @outlook

    That's too bad.. I would prefer original ones then..

    @vistatheme

    Too bad again.. Seems I would need to use Windows Blinds then. :(

    Couldn't it use less cpu power?

    @taskbar

    when I open TClock3Test it closes it auto.. I will ask about that in it's topic.

  12. Hi.

    Live Messenger 8.1 works , but Live Messenger 8.5 crush cause of Messenger Sharing Folder USN Journal

    Reader Service.

    Movie Maker 2.x works but it crash when you use popupmenu.

    Movie Maker 1.x works perfectly.

    And, some games work without nProtect.

    Does this will also able my windows 2000 to run live messenger? And also latest movie maker?

    Ok that's nice, wich files do you need to do a compatible version with my Windows (portuguese). Also you need them from windows 2000 or XP? Thanks.

    I would like to translate the program also, let me know if you want to.

  13. well... , shell32.dll, sysdm.cpl timedate.cpl

    i think that are all files i need.

    Damian66

    Ok, but I installed it and it worked! With the translated content it will translate only the program, or it will allow me custommize it more?

    Also I noticed some problems (?)

    Where some pictures:

    f_Semttulom_263cc20.jpg

    This is how looks my outlook express.. It display some images in 16 colors (?). Also there are any way to enable vista theme (the bar for close, minimize, expand the windows) without enable true transparency? (true transparency use my pc to max 100% so I disable it however it's beautiful)

    This how my start menu looks..

    f_Semttulo2m_8269ee1.jpg

    It shouldn't be like this?

    http://www.vistapack.org/images/screens/desktop2k.PNG

    More. Couldn't you center the load bar here?:

    http://www.vistapack.org/images/screens/boot2k.PNG

    Thanks, for your amazing work.

×
×
  • Create New...