Jump to content

haubmi

Member
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Germany

About haubmi

haubmi's Achievements

0

Reputation

  1. Hi, thank you TranceEnergy. How do you patch SFC with nLite? How do you tell nLite to copy with security catalog files for hotfixes? Can i do that in my step by step procedure? I thougt my last step should be to do any patches... Thanks Michael
  2. Hi 5eraph, i used: windowsxp-kb950759-x86-deu_77cda2a8778d23eed4cb91d2c67de77d4f5209d7.exe which was wget by c't offline update. I integrated KB950759 after slipstreaming of SP3. (As wsu agent "WindowsUpdateAgent30-x86.exe" used by c't offline update, installed it, in a separate test.) After integrating IE7 and setting up the VM with this iso, wsu agent (startet by c't offline update) installed it again. What is the "IE7 version" you talking about? Thank you for the link "known catalog file issue". I'did a quick scan, but found nothig that could help me or name the cause of my problem. Please forgive my ignorance, but the link is about an update pack from you. Could you be so kind and give me a bit more technical background about what could be causing this issue. Thanks Michael
  3. Hi, i was doing this: 1. slipstreamed SP3 into XP Pro with nLite (tried it in VMWare -> ok) 2. integrated KB923789, KB942763, KB950759, KB950760, KB950762, KB951376, KB951698, KB951748 with nLite (tried it in VMWare -> ok) 3. integrated IE7 with nLite When i install step 3 in VMWare i get an error saying that the battery driver could not be installed. The hardware assistand does not find it. (batt.dll is missing in Windows\System32, i copied it there and told the assistant to also search in Windows\System32, then the driver was found and installed but this is no solution becaus i want to have a unattended setup) Why does nLite corrupt the installation of the battery driver? What is the workaround? Second Problem is: If i run c't offline update on an installation from step 3. It installs KB950759 again (was allready installed in step 2). Why does that happen? What are the impacts if i integrate KB950759 again in a step 4.? Thanks in advance Michael
×
×
  • Create New...