Jump to content

rseiler

Member
  • Posts

    92
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United States

Everything posted by rseiler

  1. @Tihiy Thanks for the quick work for 26080. Vertical is back!
  2. Yes, so no vertical taskbar in 26080, at least that is clear to me, but I'm not sure about anything else which may or may not be working (with 3.7.6). Will happily try a test build when advised to.
  3. I guess I'll soon be seeing how well this works with Canary these days, even though I'm in Dev. Dev has been moved up to the same level as Canary (26052). Canary will stay on the same track as Dev for a while (giving people a chance to easily change channels to Dev if they wish) before it shoots ahead to a higher series in some unspecified future week (I would guess at least a couple weeks from now). Update: What we've seen be a sticking point in the past is the vertical toolbar, but that is not a problem. I initially thought it might be, since it was switched to horizontal (even after I thought I clicked Enable, as usual, post build update), but I went into Control Panel to enable it there, and once the shell restarted it was fine.
  4. The two I initially looked at do, but beyond that what does it mean relative to the feature that we're talking about that the same app can have different IDs at different times? I know for sure that it's the same app because of the 2008 thing.
  5. Yes, they do. It's a truly ancient (2008) app called ClipMate. I'm attaching a zipped version of a reg export for those six items. Trayiconscm.rar
  6. Ah yes, thanks. In coming from 3.6.last to 3.7.1, I noticed that my clipboard program was listed 6 times in the Tray Icons menu, but I found them there in the reg to delete. I suspect this is because they had distinct "InitialTooltip" (given that the clipboard program puts what you're copying to the clipboard in the tooltip), but that's just a guess.
  7. Since we're in the RC stage now, when 3.7 goes final, will it be what even non-Canary users get? I ask because of the emphasis in this thread to discuss 3.7 in connection with Canary only.
  8. That pic a few posts above, of 15 or so tray icons, reminds me to ask: are there any plans in 3.7 to keep track of whether those are hidden or not? The reason I ask is that information is lost when you do a Windows build upgrade, which some of us do about 50 times a year. It would be almost magical at this point if SaB could have its own system for keeping track of them so Windows doesn't screw them up every single upgrade.
  9. I assume you mean if "Check for updates" is clicked from 3.6.16? At first I thought this might be a reference to a check box which would opt someone into the beta from this release, but I don't see one.
  10. Was anyone shunted to a Windows setup screen about continuing to use facial and fingerprint recognition (neither of which I use) when upgrading to the .15 release? I've never seen that screen before, so it was a surprise. I chose one, since there seemed to be no other choice, clicked Next, and it then opened Settings, Accounts, Sign-in options. 23570
  11. Nice, thanks. I was getting a little worried by what happened in Canary given that I'm on Dev and therefore on any given week some or all of the relevant changes from Canary could have migrated over without warning, musical-chairs style.
  12. Is that in Dev? At least there, I haven't seen Copilot at all, perhaps because I have it disabled in group policy (User Config, Admin Templates, Windows Components). There would also be an equivalent Registry mod to do the same for those without gpedit.
  13. There's a very, very long history of patching termsrv.dll successfully. If done right, the only thing the OS does is replace it on the next Patch Tuesday (assuming that's one of the files updated that month).
  14. Suggestion: Upon installing a new Windows build, SaB triggers a notification telling us that there is no new version (of SaB). It would probably be better to only trigger that if there is. since otherwise it's a notification of nothing, which isn't normal.
  15. I'm on that build. While I don't have any desktop items to right-click, note that a workaround for the CP issue would have been to access it in Start via the Menu display option, as that worked. As did accessing it via a right-click on Start (if you have that configured, which is not a feature of SaB). It probably would have run via Start/Run/control.exe, too, though I'm not sure about that one.
  16. Is that a more severe version of the problems that began with 25921 early in the month?
  17. I assume you mean Canary. Check p.98 of the main thread for news on that.
  18. @AstragonQC I can't really tell the import of what Xeno is showing in that screenshot, but is SaB at the mercy of MS not removing things they're barely (or not at all) even using anymore? If so, we're in trouble. Did you try 3.6.11? I'm on 23xxx so can't test 25xxx.
  19. 23516: No problem (with the test build), so we're definitely back to normal.
  20. 23511 looks to be presenting a problem for 3.6.10, at least if you use a vertical orientation for the taskbar. If you do, the taskbar is entirely blank except for Start itself.
  21. Unsure if it's a 23xxx problem or the SAB test build (using the one with the July 9 signature), but selecting "Pin to Start Menu" for an item in the Start Menu actually pins it to the taskbar instead, as if you chose "Pin to taskbar."
  22. @karazz Are you speaking of the OP issue (corrected by the test build) or the bizarro one that I mentioned, which may be related?
  23. Have any of you on 23493 noticed a parallel Explorer issue? I saw it before the test build, too, but never before 23493. File Explorer itself gets into a funk where when you try to launch it, after about a second, it closes. But then if you try it some hours later, it may work! Or not. It's very strange. I'm using XYPlorer for now. The crash dump info is different than the shell one, which was BEX64 rather than APPCRASH: Description Faulting Application Path: C:\Windows\explorer.exe Problem signature Problem Event Name: APPCRASH Application Name: explorer.exe Application Version: 10.0.23493.1000 Application Timestamp: df7f3ef2 Fault Module Name: FileExplorerExtensions.dll Fault Module Version: 723.16708.0.0 Fault Module Timestamp: 648cf049 Exception Code: c0000005 Exception Offset: 000000000007e219 OS Version: 10.0.23493.2.0.0.256.4 Locale ID: 1033 Additional Information 1: 17e2 Additional Information 2: 17e2b7babec54ed5afc192f5a9f7f471 Additional Information 3: b805 Additional Information 4: b80543948f63128ad105915805d332b7
  24. Yes, I'm past the period now and it hasn't recurred, so this seems good.
×
×
  • Create New...