
Kmuland
MemberAbout Kmuland

Profile Information
-
OS
XP Pro x86
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
Kmuland's Achievements
4
Reputation
-
Could be posible lower the timer with this tool? some command line to enter the desired timer? I wanted to test below 1ms
-
you cannot "see". Its a feeling. Its similar to CRT times and setting monitor from 60hz to higher refresh rate. Some people didnt notice nothing.... other felt the screen more pleasant in that way
-
Million thanks!!! It was the program that I was looking for. Just a little tool to load at startup without interface!. Thanks for sharing pal!! It will run by default in all my XP machines since now
-
You are true. Lets talk about some of these tools working on XP to set the timer resolution. Currently Im using this one https://timerresolution.net/#download anymore? (better without .Net requirements)
-
Anyone know a way to set timer resolution in XP using a registry key or similar? Currently I use a timer program that needs to be open/active to maintain the desired time, but I was looking for a permanent timer change.
-
Im using some external HDs (WD) larger than 4TB in XP x64... and works perfectly. The only drawback is that you have to wait about a minute to the computer recognize the attached HD... then the drive works perfectly
-
Im setting up XP64 and I needed a package of certificates to allow programs to run. For example... the classic potplayer videoplayer gives an error "potplayer.dll is modified or hacked" if the "VeriSign Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority - G5" certificate is not installed in your OS. Currently Im using these certificates to run potplayer without problems https://github.com/JohnTHaller/RootCertificateUpdatesForLegacyWindows but I wonder what other certificates I should install to be sure that programs that rely on certain certificates works. Probably they not always give a warning at startup.
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Kmuland replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
The early internet that we knew was a big library where everyone shared info and content. The modern internet is a shopping centre, and browsers money makers machines. Just fire the start page and it is already making money from you....do a search, visit a page, everything.... and remember.,,.... if you computer goes slow or run out of memory... its cause you need to buy new hardware for internet browsing... Adblocking is just the top of the big iceberg... -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Kmuland replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
The KEY to use modern internet is not use cromium (because faster javascript).... roytam1´s browsers are enough You must block selectively the javaspript that bloat each page. UblockO addon is not enough. You need script block addons, expecially for XP and weak cpus -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Kmuland replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@roytam1 My most sincere gratitude for your work and releases... I continue using them in all my machines over the years!! Thanks a lot for your patience and time. A question. What adblocker is recommend to use with NM28? Sometimes I suspect that ublockorigin is just another piece of spyware... the telemetry removed by roytam1 is back again with the adblock addon that I install. Advice and comments are welcome. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Kmuland replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@roytam1 Thanks a lot for these great updates. I continue using newmoon on my old and new machines. REALLY APPRECIATED!! ;) Just a question. I discovered that iceape-upx consumes less memory than newmoon so its amazing for my old bnetbooks!!!!! What addons can I install with iceape-upx? I tested with the old xpi addons that I use with newmoon but I cannot install them? I need to unpack the xpi and edit it in certain way to make it iceape compatible? there is a place to download addonns already working? -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Kmuland replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Exactly thats the reason. The laptop Im using uses same mechanical HD for downloading, browser cache, windows pagefile.... so in situations withfew memory available skipping the cache saves to much r/w on disk. Really appreciated the info!!! I conserve cleanmem as best memory manager but I have to learn how to config it properly. Currently Im testing with old FF memory extensions and really does not help a lot. Ill install Lull The Tabs now... and test it. My best memory save trick for NM28 is to open a new window instead of a new tab and close the old window to really free up the memory. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Kmuland replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Right! That was why I asked about his capacities for file storage. In general, I don't think it would be a good idea to disable disk cache on devices with little RAM. Here using a mechanic HDs (160Gbs), so when Im low in ram, there is too much virtual memory disk usage... If the browser disk cache is also enabled... the delays are tedious, the HD dont stop of write/read activity.. so I prefer disable cache. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Kmuland replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Here using netbooks: -Atom N270 with 1Gb -Atom N280 with 2Gb