Leaderboard

ListDisk This tool provides detailed information about connected physical disks, including their partitions and volumes. Download https://github.com/GeorgeK1ng/ListDisk/releases Features Mounting/unmounting partitionsSetting partition labelsModifying MBR partition attributes Available Commands /mount - Mounts a partition to a specified drive letter./unmount - Unmounts a specified partition or drive letter./setlabel - Sets a new label for a specified partition./setactive - Sets or clears the bootable flag of a partition./settype - Changes the MBR type of a partition. Usage Examples /mount 0 1 U - Mounts Partition 1 on Disk 0 as U: drive./unmount 0 1 - Unmounts Partition 1 on Disk 0./unmount U - Unmounts U: drive./setLabel 0 1 Lbl - Sets 'Lbl' as the label for Partition 1 on Disk 0./setactive 0 1 - Marks Partition 1 on Disk 0 as bootable./setactive 0 1 80 - Sets the boot flag for Partition 1 on Disk 0./setactive 0 1 00 - Clears the boot flag for Partition 1 on Disk 0./settype 0 1 0x17 - Sets Partition 1 on Disk 0 to type NTFS Hidden (0x17)./settype 0 1 0x07 - Sets Partition 1 on Disk 0 to type NTFS (0x07). Requirements Operating System: Windows XP and newer. Note for Windows XP Users: This tool requires the installation of the Microsoft Visual C++ Redistributable. Please install it from this link.Compatible with Windows Preinstallation Environment (WinPE).Place ListDisk in %WinDir%\system32 to make it easy accessible from commandline! Note: Use this utility with caution. Incorrect usage may affect data integrity.

No, those are two completely different guys. To clarify: Supermium is made by @win32 - Canada, Thorium (100% based on Supermium) but made by Alex F. "Alex313031" - Russia.

Fully updated Windows is always key, specially in XP days. I can't uderstand why a lot of people ignoring UpdatePacks and they crying and complaining. It's still same after another 10 years. Yes, and of course there could be bugs. But I quess I must face these issues, when testing images on real machines. Another point is, many "Windows XP Enthusiast" never have real XP machine and never used them, they are just too young..

Yes it is. That's what "Alex F." (Thorium) wrote at his official github page. Not long after "Alex F." edited his profile and changed location from Russia to US. "I just tweak a few things, and do the necessary steps to remove Supermium branding..." He didn't, the maker himself did. Familiarize yourself with his statement. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/363#issuecomment-1998666719

Well then Tutonota cant send anyone not using Tutanota email messages and MXtoolbox or other tools that can check for SMTP will say no stmp found, oh wait it says there is MX record and SMTP https://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=mx%3atutanota.de&run=toolpage STMP is not just for sending emails from client it is also means which email server communicate with other email server. Just because you cant connect to SMTP to send message does not mean it wont exist. If there is email server you can send email to there is SMTP on both ends. Now STMP can (and should be) wrapped in SSL/TLS tunnel where it is encrypted similar to HTTPS traffic but if encryption is breached it is readable. And all this time I am referring to standard email, one other side will receive. There are similar commercial solutions with ability to send link to protected mail server but that mail telling you got secured mail is still sent using SMTP between two mail servers. I highly recommend you do more research on email system before you start argue about this topic. I work almost daily with email servers and know how it runs under the hood on any of them. Even Microsoft Exchange despite using MAPI protocol uses SMTP to talk with other mail servers.

I don't have to prove anything to anyone, I only wrote what I saw a very long time ago, I don't have a github account, I don't follow what's up there. But someone who distributes cr*cks would logically want to hide the real location, no? BTW, the username is still very Russian, and his English speaks for itself. By this very logic you would demand proof win32 is from Canada, right? As for me, I'm 100% certain win32 is from Canada. Alex F., on other hand, well, you know. In any case, don't use the browser if you're worried. Solved.

Then something's wrong on your end, according to @George King, and I quote. "When I installed Windows XP SP3+ (All updates until 04-2019 and .NET and Visual C++)" "it (Supermium) works like a charm." @George Kingwouldn't tell crap, trust me. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/493#issuecomment-2067100117

New build of Serpent/UXP for XP! Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20240420-3219d2d-uxp-552db66da0-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20240420-3219d2d-uxp-552db66da0-xpmod.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20240420-3219d2d-uxp-552db66da0-xpmod-ia32.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32 NM28XP build: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240420-d849524bd-uxp-552db66da0-xpmod.7z Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240420-d849524bd-uxp-552db66da0-xpmod-ia32.7z Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20240420-d849524bd-uxp-552db66da0-xpmod-sse.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20240420-d849524bd-uxp-552db66da0-xpmod.7z Official UXP changes picked since my last build: - Issue #2470 - Check for failure of getting IDXGIKeyedMutex. (07cc276a10) - Issue #2472 - Enable dialog element by default. (f2c576b12c) - [DOM] Add nullcheck on mDoc in GetEventTargetParent (2811d30051) - Issue #2503 - Part 1: add CPU IS support flags to Navigator interface (35d7a1fe5a) - Issue #2503 - Part 2: Add CPU IS support flags to UpdateUtils URL substitutions. (a211c7d7f3) - Issue #2503 - Part 2b: Fix missing navigator in UpdateUtils. (baf98e0dde) - Issue #2503 - Part 3: Add CPU capabilities to about:support. (407a79e79f) - [XPCOM] Warn about .xrm-ms files on Windows (treat as executable) (f6204a7ca8) - [network] Keep track of and check HTTP/2 header sizes. (1ddd3ea76b) - [js] Simplify tracing of arguments in MarkThisAndArguments. (dc52303799) - [gfx] Pull several OTS fixes from upstream to improve data safety. (9b6c2f36f1) - [dom media] Avoid a potential issue when assigning a media data buffer. (9eaee03eb4) No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build. No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build. My changes since my last build: - dom: check mDoc before use, as it can be null (0acd996e03) Update Notice: - You may delete file named icudt*.dat inside program folder when updating from old releases. * Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.

Offline Translator

Stop threatening MSFN members. If you are so disgusted by the collective decision of the Reddit's highly respected community to officially label it as "child pornography distribution", if you don't agree with the results of the investigation, just ignore those posts. And this matter is directly related to the compromised security of that browser and safety of MSFN members, consequently - it's not off-topic.

I think you missed my point. Even though you send link trough email it is not standard email anymore as I cant read and answer it using email client of my choice. Tutanota and Proton while internally encrypting all still cant talk to outside world without utilising SMTP which is like sending your email on postcard. Even if over ssl it is just writing message to postcard using some secret language, if someone cracks it can read you message. Also you are relying on their server to be secured and not get compromised and even if they actually would be not storing encryption key on their server like they claim some hacker could just inject malicious javascript to steal your secret key and access all your mails. No system is hacker proof and point you become valuable enough target it is matter of time is hacked. And even if they made is hacker proof you still trust for them to run what they claim on their server. Unless you walked there without warning and scanned all server code you can only take their word for it. Showing server source code wont mean they run it on server side unless can inpsect the servers. On the other hand PGP I mentioned is standard and decryption key is only stored locally, if you try read email on server there is nothing to read. While there been exploit like Efail for PGP those been since patched and it did not affect Claws mail.

Such as thing as secure email does not exist due to email nature. It was never built to be secure in first place. Even if you encrypt SMTP traffic with ssl and only access email using some client with perhaps even ip based blocking it is still not 100% secure. Solutions like that only add bandages into root issue. Point you are sending email outside "secure" provider it is as secure as on any other provider. Even if you use something like deltagon secure mail which many companies uses it does not offer full security as all i need is link for secure email and open it before original recipient does. And that email link is sent to any insecure email server. Even got SMS MFA to view secure messages there are means to intercept text messages (which i cant talk here) Closest for secure email is to use PGP to encrypt email but I just opt not send anything confidential over the email and treat it like sending postcards.

https://codeberg.org/Theodor2/Mypal68/releases github still not, don't know, I have set autoupdate from codeberg https://www.mypal-browser.org/download.html just now

That's pre-release for Microsoft, actually. I need them to remove update block as I'm unable to work it around without a jigsaw.

That's not the question I asked. Anyways, we can't even be sure it's on the level of the 114 engine. Many flags and/or functions are missing, just read on github.

Is Chrome telemetry stripped away from this browser? Someone checked?

Yep! And even New Moon 28 can deal with these certificates:

Thorium still has a dedicated website (not sure how old it is), but I don't advise to link to it, it has loads of Windows cr-cks, including his own, so don't get banned for posting his site! Or this topic might be locked, too! Thorium is still a distributor of highly illegal content.

Why off-top? It's not off-top. I'll tell you where. Alex had his own website long before he made that github account. Several MSFN members linked to that site, but it was not allowed for posting because Alexei hosted cr*cks on his site along with the browser Thorium. Then he deleted that site after the scandal with the child p0rn distribution (but we are forbidden to go into further details) by Dave-H. As you may remember, the old Thorium topic was locked, probably due to the reason of Alex (Thorium) distributing cr*cked Windows loaders, etc...

uBlock Origin 1.16.6b1 by @UCyborg: https://github.com/UCyborg/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy/releases

BTW, I do not watch YouTube videos in browsers under Windows XP. YouTube has become bloated and cumbersome for many years. Under Windows XP and older, weaker machines, there are different ways to watch them more unbloated and less resource-consuming. @NotHereToPlayGames One way is to use the extension uTube from RealityRipple Software for UXP browsers. Doing so, you won't see any ads, even not these annoyances at the end of the Adblocker Test Video. All you have to do is to edit the install.rdf to make it compatible with New Moon 28 or Serpent 52.

Fixed in the next version, I shall to publish it upon a week most likely

That's unfortunately not enough. What about all default uBlock filters? For blocking YouTube ads, you can enable uBlock filters – Quick fixes and GoodbyeAds-YouTube-AdBlock-Filter. In my thread, you will find my latest release containing all these filter lists and more. And in my article, you will find corresponding images of the tab Filter lists. In any case, I don't get ads in YouTube videos when using my mod uBlock Origin Legacy.

New Moon 28 is the browser I mainly use from @roytam1's releases. Many websites can be loaded without serious problems. But of course, there are bloated and cumbersome sites which are loading terribly. However, some of them can be edited with the help of uBlock Origin so that they run reasonably well again. For example, you can neuter the GMX homepage and completely remove all the news, adverts, videos and so on. Or use the right filter lists to access news pages like The New York Times again. On PCWelt, around 1000 elements are blocked with my activated filter lists and runs super smoothly again. However, without uBO, it would make no sense to access such websites on older machines.

Online Registration

We'd like to see some hard proof of that. Like @NotHereToPlayGames always puts it - "gut feeling doesn't count".

I have ran (in VM only) some Thorium releases in the past. LONG before Supermium was ever a thing! I did find Thorium to be STABLE. Even with only 2GB RAM allocated to the VM. Like it or not, Supermium is simply NOT THERE -- *yet* I personally don't mind, in the least, viewing Thorium EXACTLY as we did 360Chrome "in the days of forgotten lore". Nobody trusted 360Chrome in the beginning either. It was MSFN Members that evolved it into something we were comfortable with. Logging its every connection, hex editing .dll's, customizing GUI, et cetera. Nothing wrong, in the least, with doing the same to Thorium... And Supermium... Show a screen cap of Thorium making a questionable connection. The "throw granny from the cliffs" scare tactic approach isn't doing anybody any good.

Ethical reasons, also.

You only need to post 1 answer and wait for another player to respond. Otherwise it's cheating,,,

Science World.

I meant the song by Alan Hawkshaw - Astral Plain (1979)

Coefficient Analysis

In Vista eSata can also be powered down.

Is this triple posting glitch back again?

The article is obviously old, it was a glitch in SP1, in RTM and SP2 - they do.

oops, this is a false positive due to bad coding practice. problem is inside wintz.cpp and I finally got it fixed. https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commit/92e1373e8c7dc28bcc715aaad0bd9558b11a7909 (EDIT: from my limited testing, it seems to be fine with AutoDST on or off, so no further change will be made about it)

I thouht what is it, because it works to me, then got that this is only bug when switched to single process. There no good point to do this unless your machine is very weak with poor RAM 1gb and less. On regular machine like core2dua with 2gb RAM use default multiprocess mode And I try fix this menu next version. 68.14 is now cooking for publish.

How can I integrate this into Windows XP? Is there an installation file or a ready-made file that I can copy to a specific folder? Unfortunately, I am not familiar with this. This was just a hint that Elliptic Curve Cryptography can be ported to Windows XP. No more, no less. How this can be done, no idea. The linked project is not documented more detailed. But as you stated clearly, you like such short information. Personally, I do not really need such a port.

I don't know what uBO users at large value as super important, there are a lot of under the hood changes, one of the things that stood out to me were filters using $removeparam, AdGuard URL Tracking Filter list uses those exclusively for removing tracking parameters from URLs when navigating web pages. Number of changes, including this one, come from later versions that saw much code cleanup, meaning, in layman terms, you can't copy-paste code directly from web extension. There's loads of now closed issues that were opened once for the extension... Also newer versions have some code parts written in WebAssembly for performance reasons. Anyway, don't look at me for big updates, I hate programming...maybe I'll still try to get some of the easier stuff into the old extension, not right now though as I'm not in the right place mentally. The older I get, the more software seems like politics. A bunch of bickering how to achieve certain result...

Regarding Mypal 68, all related to localisation and internationalisation has not been implemented yet. No correct local times. No time zones. This was reported by me long time ago: https://github.com/Feodor2/Mypal68/issues/96

No, we don't. You said: This statement does not refer to any cert stores. You have to stand by what you said. Maybe, you should correct this statement so that it can be assigned a Boolean truth value of true again. The evidence can be found in the previous posts.

And what about that? A Windows port of the Elliptic Curve Cryptography library (ECC-LIB): https://github.com/argp/ecc-lib-win32

Guys, sorry for the late arrival. There is a lot of true info in these recent posts, there is also a lot of misleading half-truths. I shall attempt to clear the air, but sometimes that is impossible here at MSFN when people doing the discussing already have preconceived notions (which may result in this being my ONLY reply to these recent posts). I speak solely towards my 360Chrome v13.5.1030 Redux as that is the only version I still use. My other versions "should" be the same in this regard. First, yes, it is "true" that iTrusChina Co.,Ltd. is LISTED in the Trusted Certificates Store - that is not the same thing as saying it is being "used" by 360Chrome. The USE of this certificate is "supposed to be" BROKEN in my builds. Now then, with that said, how do we PROVE that the USE of this cert is BROKEN? You must must must first locate a web site that USES that cert! https://valid-isrgrootx2.letsencrypt.org/ does NOT use that cert - it uses "E1". More importantly, it uses "ECDHE_ECDSA" as the key exchange mechanism - this is not compatible with WinXP and cannot be made compatible with WinXP. My 360Chrome is "secure" for this E1 cert using ECDHE_ECDSA because this is on WINDOWS 10 and not XP!

Again off-topic, but the faulty file open dialogue has been fixed on the latest version of Thorium, so I guess Supermium will not be far behind!

Online Mass

He might be rebasing his build on top of Supermium now as Chromium updates every 5 minutes and keeping up with it must be crazy and that was probably the most efficient way to catch up and it presented the opportunity to make a build that runs on XP. Still, are there any other Chromium builds with that specific patchset? They do make it a unique build.

Unfortunately, I can't say anything about DuckDuckGo. I do not use it, not even in Mypal 68. But just for testing purpose, I will try to load pictures from this search engine next time.

I'd suggest to avoid this "browser" at all costs, simply to skip any potential problems with the police. Already discussed here, in the topics below. And since it's a Supermium's knock-off, based solely on Supermium, strange you have troubles with Supermium itself. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1263138 https://www.reddit.com/r/browsers/comments/18ihls8/dont_use_thorium_browser_if_you_have_it_installed/

Basically, what we wrote you about the R470 branch being too old for that GPU. A big lie from nVidia is nothing new! This time you have hard proof, talk to the press. Back up the false advertising page. Sue them, I dunno, at least demand money back + compensation.

I wouldn't go out and just buy a 3090 Ti, all of that because a random entity on the internet wrote it "worked" for him, just saying. Gather more info before the purchase!