Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/19/2021 in all areas

  1. This has been known for years. And this is obviously a years-old article, too... as Windows XP does NOT have 27% market share since probably 2014. And, Windows 8 is cited as "new". You did give credit to the site and author of the article, but a direct link (no shorteners) would be very handy, and reccommended to include should you share another article. Also, it is considered weird and somewhat annoying by many to capitialize the first letter of every word in English. Only the first word of a sentance, names (Microsoft, Bob, Ontario, etc.), and acronyms (Such as M.A.D.D.) would typically be capitalized. I don't know about whatever your first language is if it isn't English, but in English it's not customary To Capitialize Every Word In A Sentence As You Always Do. Just a tip.
    5 points
  2. To each their own, but since you bring it up and seem to be requesting feedback -- my feedback is this, I DON'T GIVE A RATS ARSE ABOUT "UPDATES". The very FIRST thing I do whenever I install ANY operating systems is to DISABLE UPDATES !!! !!! !!! However, I do SLIPSTREAM updates before every installation - so I do "update". And one of the things I *LOVE* about Win XP is that I don't have to WASTE THE TIME slipstreaming MORE updates. I stopped slipstreaming and patching SO-CALLED "risks" in June 2017 on this computer (WinXP x64) and in January 2018 on my SIX computers running WinXP x86. I do NOT run antivirus - haven't for a good 15 years or so. If you know "how" to use a computer and know when to click and when not to click and if you do NOT let your software "phone home" and if you only allow WHITELISTED javascript, then "you'll do just fine". And make sure your hardware firewall (I also no longer waste my time with software firewalls) is set up properly. "You'll do just fine". WITHOUT concerning yourself with HYPOTHETICAL "so-called" 'security risks' propegated by an industry perpetuated as "needed" only when you allow 12 year olds to install "games" or when grandma installs some "coupon app". But anywhoo...
    4 points
  3. If you're going to make these polls, they should actually make sense (bonus points if they were to have a purpose). Obviously, one could not use XP "forever" (as a main, i presume that is what you are talking about). At some point it will become too difficult/impossible to use it for modern things, for even the most hardcore diehards. So that pretty much takes the first option off of the table for everyone. And presuming one didn't plan to use XP "forever" (or 2025, or 2023...rather inconsistent), switching to Linux is not the ONLY option. One could move to a newer Windows OS, they could use a Mac system, or any number of other things, should they stop using Windows XP. (as a side note, i find your personal vote of "I will use it forever" extremely amusing, considering every other day, or perhaps even more frequently, it seems you are switching your Main OS.) Personally, I'll hold out on XP until I can't anymore, whenever that is. I've got too much going on now to give more worry about the future than I already do.
    3 points
  4. No, I used to say also that I will use WinXP forever too, but it became unusable for my everyday needs, so I switched to q4OS Linux with xpq4 theme and from then I never looked back at it. Of course I still keep an XP VM around, If I need software that does not work with wine...
    2 points
  5. I'll use my XP *FOREVER*. Even if THIRTY YEARS from now I "might" not be able to use a web browser or email client, I will STILL be using XP even if only on a secondary computer for Chess, Scrabble, Monopoly, Solitaire, Mahjong, Soduko, Kakuro, Crossword Puzzles, and other miscellaneous pass-the-time games that retired old folgies do between naps and yelling at the neighbor kids to get off their lawn. Although, having said that, I will also have to admit that ONE of my SIX "secondary" computers DID get upgraded to Win10 LTSB about five months or so ago because I got tired of several web sites "forcing" me to have FOUR web browsers! One web browser ONLY for ONE web site. Another web browser ONLY for a SECOND web site. A third web browser for rare miscellaneous. Then my at-the-time default for everything else. But now, ONLY because of 360Chrome, I have THANKFULLY been able to "upgrade" that secondary computer back to WinXP! Because while I like to tinker with several web browsers, I have no interest in being forced to have different web browsers for different web sites.
    2 points
  6. Don't forget that the Windows XP code was leaked, so Microsoft must do something in order to protect all Windows XP computers. Maybe they must make updates for all people, but not free.
    1 point
  7. I would to use WinXP as far as I can. I even can run Windows 10 vms inside Windows XP, and the experience is better using PAE (my pc have an I5 processor with 4 cores and 8gb of ram). I expect the One Core API/Extended XP will make XP able to run modern software. I'm also thinking that there will be XP bassed operating Systems, maybe with the addition of Linux shell and dlls. So, I still will be using XP, but I don't know if that will be forever. I just expect there will be alternatives to Windows 10, Linux and Mack.
    1 point
  8. Made a fresh Win2000 install, installed KernelEx, then installed the driver - it didn't work. But then I found extended core 16a, installed that, and on reboot the driver worked!
    1 point
  9. Perhaps the cause is the 12a extended core. Uninstall it and reinstall the driver. After that, you can install the extended core again. And the reason may be that the downloaded version of the driver may need a higher or lower version.
    1 point
  10. The "wrapper" program previously mentioned is called JauntePE and can be found here -- https://sourceforge.net/projects/jauntepe/files/ I'm not sure those 2 folders are worth the "learning curve" to learn JauntePE but I guess that's up to you. I personally clear my cache of EVREYTHING upon exiting EVERY browser session so at least on my end those 2 folders are EMPTY so they don't bother me sitting in ~\Application Data\. The "portable loader" does have a "[RunAfter]" section but I confess that I've never used it.
    1 point
  11. I found that if you enable compatibility mode with Windows 2000, then version 13 starts to open sites with TLS 1.3 and with a valid certificate. Maybe someone already wrote about it, but I haven't seen it. You can check on this site, it only uses version 1.3: https://tls13.1d.pw/
    1 point
  12. Your hard drive might be wearing out. About reinstalling Vista, I hope you are aware that Windows Update no longer works.
    1 point
  13. Not that I'm aware of. Those folders are temp and will be EMPTIED every time you close the browser. SEVERAL portable browsers can even share that same folder without affecting each other. I use a "wrapper" program at home that will perform what you seek, but I don't recall what it is called offhand. And with those folders being EMPTIED by default, I just let them sit there and ignore them.
    1 point
  14. Hello! My name's Matthew and I really like NT 6.0 and 6.1 which I use as my daily drivers (dualboot), but I may consider plain Vista. I'm happy to be a part of the MSFN community!
    1 point
  15. From Belgium, hello @PugLover13 and welcome to MSFN! I hope you enjoy the forums! Have a nice day. hpwamr
    1 point
  16. 1 point
  17. are you getting invalid password and need hit login prompt multiple times before login? If yes it is related to buggy tls on xp. You can fix it with proxhttpsproxy. Either run it locahost or at LAN. Do you use it laptop or desktop and do you only use it at home?
    1 point
  18. The problem is fixed. If the German version of SYSDM.CPL is used the space is large enough.
    1 point
  19. Anyone got a working driver for the Nvidia 1060? Found that you can add lines with ID to the driver inf file, added them, the driver was installed, but does not work. When the system was turned on, it got 640x480 resolution and 4-bit color. Perhaps you need a specific driver version? I've tried 368.81-desktop-winxp-64bit-international. I have a 1060 3GB graphics card, but I think there is no difference from the amount of memory.
    1 point
  20. 970 and 980 are officially only in 344.11, in newer ones they have already been removed. And the video cards 1030-1080 were not in any driver.
    1 point
  21. I downloaded the 368.91 driver, and I don't see 970 or newer cards in ListDevices.txt. Softpedia seems to be wrong. The only driver page on the NVIDIA official site that I can find also doesn't list them.
    1 point
  22. I'm trying to install Windows XP x64 on a Dell Inspiron 3542 laptop. I already slipstreamed the AHCI driver with nLite. I'm getting a 0xA5 BSOD about the BIOS not being ACPI compliant. I set the laptop to use Legacy boot but I don't have any other options like IDE emulation or using an older ACPI table. I tried several patched 64-bit ACPI drivers, including one from 2019, but I get the same error. @AndrewB#6680 on Discord (I assume @AndrewB on here) provided the recent ACPI driver and when it failed he said I should ask @daniel_k about it. Has anyone else had success using patched ACPI drivers with XP x64 on recent Dell computers?
    1 point
  23. I did , but even on vista they dont work properly so it functioning on XP is far-fetched i would say.
    1 point
  24. You are right, the files I linked are 32 bit (my bad, didn't see the x64 ), on the other thread Burd linked to them and latet for XP64 are 368.81: https://msfn.org/board/topic/177373-winxp-drivers-for-gtx-10xx-video-cards/?do=findComment&comment=1150073 Still I don't think they will work. jaclaz
    1 point
  25. This driver is for 32 bits only. Yes, no one seems to have been able to run 10x0 graphics cards.
    1 point
  26. I think latest for XP are 368.91: https://drivers.softpedia.com/get/GRAPHICS-BOARD/NVIDIA/NVIDIA-GeForce-iCafe-Graphics-Driver-36891-for-XP.shtml But it seems like it is a hit and miss game, see: https://msfn.org/board/topic/177373-winxp-drivers-for-gtx-10xx-video-cards/ https://msfn.org/board/topic/177373-winxp-drivers-for-gtx-10xx-video-cards/?do=findComment&comment=1177300 jaclaz
    1 point
  27. I took a look at this tool and it seems very impressive. This video is nice for anyone who's not familiar with it. I'm not sure I would ever use the "automated installer" part of it, but it seems to be a great way to build an archive of updates even if one uses them manually. However obviously it depends on how thorough the person building the database was... and whether or not the links in the database still work. Also probably doesn't include any updates that were not offered on WU or the Catalog (assuming some of these exist) such as anything in a "HotFix by request" category. At this point I suppose we only have The HotFix Share for anything like that... It seems one can somehow write custom Update lists; for someone familiar with the tool it might be possible to modify the working list from this thread to work with the tool.
    1 point
  28. @dencorso you're not the moderator we deserve, but the moderator we need ^^ @PCDW_386 most of these Wayback Machine links were tested by me recently, as I downloaded the files myself using them txt list is ok, drop it and I'll attach it in first post.
    1 point
  29. Good News: It's done, now there's a download link in the 1st post... Bad News: I've turned *YOU* into the op of this thread, so now it's up to you to keep the 1st post up to date and meaningful...
    1 point
  30. I can do that for the said 5000+ links , although I need to check the ones that were already @ the Wayback Machine, too (I really hope they're still alive). Should I put the list here, as a TXT inside a ZIP file like the other ones? Where is the best place to put such a resource? (Remember it will change as I check the other links. At least, the MS/Windows Update ones are already checked! I really wish I could do that faster, but time is what I need and don't have for the time being )
    1 point
  31. That article addresses using secure Web sites whose certificates were signed using SHA2. We've had that for some time. (The questioner wanted to backport the SHA2 Web certificate support to XP SP2.) Unfortunately, using SHA2 to sign code (e.g., updates) requires support in different parts of the OS, so the support for SHA2 Web certificates doesn't really help.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...