Leaderboard

Here are all of the browser names from this thread. I think I've got everything without error. Please correct if necessary. I'm aware that some other suggestions were made in the old browser thread but there's waaaaaaaayyyyyy too many in here. browsernamesr1.txt

Here's something that I don't think gets a lot of thought, but at the same time, we need to remain vigilant of it. Those who many not dualboot and use Windows 2000 natively will notice that new printers are getting harder and harder to find that support Windows 2000. That's where I want this thread to come in. I'm now the proud owner of a brand new HP Color LaserJet Pro MFP M281fdw printer and of course, the oldest OS it supports is Windows XP Service Pack 3, which is honestly surprising in itself. So on my quest to find something that worked, I took note that Windows 2000 does have a native Color LaserJet driver available by default, the HP Color LaserJet 8500PS driver. You actually can use the Universal Print Driver v4.7 but to be honest, the above driver works better as the colors seem a bit more true to what they should be, the UPD makes your color images a bit dark. I decided to take my chances and was pleasantly surprised, this driver WORKS on Windows 2000 for this printer. It communicates without a hitch and prints just fine in color. Now, who can truly argue with that? There may be other, better ones that may work but I felt the need to document this right now and also to just start a thread of printers that are working on Windows 2000 in the year 2020 and beyond. This is one of HP's latest LaserJets so that is fantastic to have a driver working that doesn't even need to be a universal driver. I have not tested this as far as a direct connection goes though as this is communicating over my network wirelessly. Once I get another Ethernet cable, I'm quite positive I will be hardwiring it instead as a direct wire connection is not only faster but more reliable though the router is only 4 feet away from the printer in the next room. So please, share what you guys find and lets keep Windows 2000 going as long as we can while keeping it as functional as we can! Printing is certainly a fundamental so we need a database that we can ensure proper replacements as our aging hardware fails.

Out uBlockO legacy v1.16.4.19.

Yes, the main download page should now serve it to you (unless you are spoofing a newer OS). Working on Vista, but I prefer much older versions.

It turned out that there is a special version for XP and Vista, build 5.64.7577. https://download.ccleaner.com/sunset/ccsetup564_xp-vista.exe

Ccleaner 5.64 does not work in XP, xompie does not fix. The latest working version is 5.63. And in Vista it doesn’t work either. Standard https://download.ccleaner.com/ccsetup563.exe Slim https://download.ccleaner.com/slim/ccsetup563_slim.exe Professional Edition [New UI] https://download.ccleaner.com/professional/ccsetup563_pro.exe https://download.ccleaner.com/ccsetup563pro.exe Technician Edition https://download.ccleaner.com/te/ccsetup563_te.exe Business Edition https://download.ccleaner.com/be/ccsetup563_be.exe Business Edition MSI x64 https://download.ccleaner.com/be/ccsetup563_x64_be.msi Business Edition MSI x86 https://download.ccleaner.com/be/ccsetup563_x86_be.msi Portable https://download.ccleaner.com/portable/ccsetup563.zip

I have discovered that in Opera if you adjust the zoom slider across to 200% the page fills 100% width on MSFN forum. Same with CometBird9 when zoomed above 200%. Effects posting though with Opera, there is no space bar working at end of text. 190% or less still has a narrow view. Siria, I tested your code again in Wyzo 3.6.16/28 and it is brilliant. I did not copy to correct folder first time. It works for CometBird8 or 9 as well, just make a folder in AppData profile named Chrome and make up a userContent.css. I copied the example ones over from inside OMNI.jar omni\defaults\profile\chrome as well.

You should try SETUP /P I;S=detectbus to install W9x without PCI-bus.

Good to know Roytam1. This is the cipher suit from CometBird9 reported from HowsMySSL with FF10 NSS files you made. TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA This is the cipher suit with rzbrowser-tls12-20200127.7z ones TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA

I really like that naming scheme except for "RFox" part. BTW, still not dead ;)

Thanks for the code siria, looks like you spent lots of time on it. Just paste it into userContent.css jumper. By default there is no userContent.css file, just userContent-example.css. Copy userContent-example.css to userContent.css and paste siria's code. In RetroZilla v2.2 the pathway is: C:\WINDOWS\Application Data\RetroZilla\Profiles\default\your_profile\chrome With the tweaks was able to log in without changing to style none. However, can't tell i'm logged in. Still need to change back to style none to see my login stuff (notifications, settings, etc). First impression is somewhat better but still broken compared to a modern browser. Will test a bit more. What about a style that's essentially 'None' but just removes excessive whitespace?

Wunderbar98 said: > IMHO probably a losing battle once a browser needs to modify CSS site specific At the beginning not much of a prob yet. If it helps, it's great. Just occasional fiddling a bit with styles, then glad that frequent sites look neat again. But that was years ago, and meanwhile yeah, it's become a real pain. Now find myself fiddling and struggling with site-fixes almost daily, and gets harder and harder :-( Here are some helper styles for Firefox-2 / 3.5, tried to polish my drafty code a bit. The crucial lines are just a few, marked with "killer" ;-) Hope the board will not mess the syntax. @-moz-document url-prefix(https://msfn.org/board/) , url-prefix(http://web.archive.org/web/20180530181434/https://msfn.org/board/) { /*======= For Firefox3.5 + FF2? / KM1.6 */ /* KILLER since 2020-Feb-13: page only half screen width and comments BELOW author block article=both (unhides middle titles) / aside=left / div.ipsColumn=right : */ article[id^="elComment_"] {display: block !important;} aside.ipsComment_author {display: table-cell !important;} div.ipsColumn {display: table-cell !important; width: auto !important;} /* Fix: crosslinks to other posts only empty rectangles */ body.unloaded #ipsEmbedLoading{position: relative !important;} /* old KM-bug: posted images completely vanished if TLS broken */ div[data-role="commentContent"] img:not([data-emoticon]) { min-width: 30px !important; min-height: 30px !important; } /* other bits */ a {text-decoration: underline !important;} div[class="ipsItemControls"] {background-color: transparent !important; } /*======= Only needed for Firefox2 / KM154 */ /* KILLER since 2020-Feb-13: page only half screen width. No chance except FIX px */ div.ipsColumn {width: 720px !important; } /* dec 2019: FF2/KM154: Fix: title of single topic pages only 5cm wide */ body div h1 span.ipsType_break {width: 750px !important;} /* FF2/KM154: Fix: TAG-rows stacked vertical */ ul.ipsTags {display: table-row !important; } ul.ipsTags li {display: table-cell !important;} ul.ipsTags li a:link {color: blue !important; background-color: transparent !important;} /* dec 2019 FF2/KM154: Fix: pagenumbers stacked vertical */ ul.ipsPagination {display: table-row !important; } ul.ipsPagination li {display: table-cell !important; padding-left: 12px !important;} li.ipsPagination_pageJump a {white-space: nowrap !important;} /* dec 2019 FF2/KM154: Fix: page Numbers white on white etc */ li.ipsPagination_first a, li.ipsPagination_page a, li.ipsPagination_last a, li.ipsPagination_next a, li.ipsPagination_prev a, li.ipsPagination_pageJump a {background-color: transparent !important; } ul.ipsPagination {background-color: transparent !important; } li.ipsPagination_active {background-color: peru !important; } } /* Firefox2 / KM154: Ric: Recent post list too narrow, and titles only 5cm */ @-moz-document url-prefix(https://msfn.org/board/discover) { h2 span { width: 800px !important; padding: 4px !important; font-weight: bold !important; background-color: #ffee66 !important; } }

Goodmaneuver said: > Does everyone experience a 600 pixel wide view when viewing > MSFN forum now with Opera 12.02 or is it just me. Oh yeah :-( Definitely not just you, and not just Opera either, but other very old browsers too, Firefox and other Geckos. That prob first started at Feb-13, and after much struggling and fiddling have finally concluded it depends purely on engine css-capabilities. Useragents don't help at all. And the width is just one prob now, the second annoying layout mess in such ancient browsers is the vertical stacking of author-block and comment-block now! But funnily, that vertical prob is NOT happening in KM1.5 (Firefox2), and not in KM74 (Firefox24), only in between, in my KM1.6+1.7 (Firefox 3.5/3.6). That led me to suspect it may be caused by some 'new' html5 tags introduced in FF3.5 with just initial support, not fully yet, perhaps with other default display values at first, suspects like "aside" or "article"... And obviously same probs in Opera12.02, both, as just tested after your post. Oh great, now must fiddle with that too, grmpf. Anyway, meanwhile figured out workarounds for userContent.css. Not perfect, and it's adjusted to my own screen width (1024), but finally a view again that doesn't hurt they eyes, OUF! That workaround-code is just a bit complicated and messy, meant only for selfhelp. May post it later as last resort, but hope that someone has a better solution? Perhaps should do more tests to figure out more too - wonder e.g. if the original css may work again by only exchanging aside-article with div's again, or whatever was the initial cause? The universal prob is that this messy css with newer html-tags is now affecting LOTS of websites and forums :-( Especially breaks layout widths, usually rather too wide, needing constant scrolling left-right or killing styles completely, but often also half-screen width as here (and I always thought this were intential, being forced unto a narrow 'mobile' view!), or causing overlapping stuff, everthing needing killing all styles as workaround. And suddenly have understood why so many other forums lately have vertically stacked author-blocks, so that stupid layout is not intentional either. So what we really could use urgently is a universal workaround for those tags! What I also wonder: have seen that all browsers have a default css sheet deep inside omni.ja somewhere. Unlike userContent.css, that wouldn't get enforced on all sites, only deliver default values. Would it perhaps help anything to exchange this one with a newer one, containing all new tags with their default values?? Or would that break yet more? And that's probably missing OLDER tags in exchange? Anyone know if there's somewhere a finished perfect "mix" css-sheet for old browsers...?

I have discovered that 360 Extreme Explorer has built in support for Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithms (ECDS) which the versions of Chrome suitable for XP do not have, and hence you are not plagued with pages that will not load and give the message "ERR_SSL_VERSION_OR_CIPHER_MISMATCH". Here is the supported cipher suites for a the server of a site that cannot normally be viewed with Chrome under XP - https://www.aidanwoods.com/blog/faulty-login-pages/ TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 OLD_TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA Here are the cipher suites supported by Advanced Chrome 54.20.6530.0 which only include cipher suites with the RSA Digital Signature Algorithm TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256_OLD TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256_OLD TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA Here are the cipher suites supported by 360 Extreme Explorer. I have highlighted in bold those that match the cipher suites supported by the aidanwoods.com site. TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA As you can see 360 Extreme Explorer provides three cipher suites with Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithms that match those supported by the aidanwoods.com site.

I have no experience on Chrome. I come from using Firefox, K-Meleon, New Moon and derivatives. I have many computers and many have old hardware. Only when the Firefox version has become really very slow have I realized that Google Chrome 49 is much faster. So, thanks to an earlier comment on this thread, I have tried all Chinese browsers based on Chromium on Windows XP and also on Windows 10 @redapple0204 Those that work on XP are the following: (please examine file with a good antivirus before running, some seem to have introduced viruses) -2345 Explorer (there is only in Chinese language) http://ie.2345.cc/ (for PC) https://app.2345.com/ (for phone) -360 Extreme Explorer (webkit adapted to Blink + Trident (IE according to web compatibility) 360 Extreme Explorer” is the real name today for international version of Chinese explorer “360 Secure Explorer”. The name "360 Browser" refers to an international old version, the last one is based on Chromium 31 and it is version 7.5.2.104 https://360-browser.en.softonic.com/ International versions based on Chromium 78 or higher are named "360 Extreme Explorer": Official International version: https://browser.360.cn/ee/en.html Modified in China: http://www.qiuquan.cc/browser/360chrome.html Modified in Russia: https://lrepacks.ru/repaki-programm-dlya-interneta/182-360-extreme-explorer-amp-portable.html Mod. crack for Official International version: http://forum.ru-board.com/topic.cgi?forum=5&topic=49673 The current version for the Chinese market is called... -360 Secure Explorer aka 360 Secure Browser The official version is downloaded here (only in Chinese language) http://browser.360.cn/ And here is the modified version in China: http://www.qiuquan.cc/browser/360se.html -Google Chrome 79.0.3945.88 (unofficial) Google Chrome 79.0.3945.88 Stable x86 - 20191219 Tested on Windows XP: chrome.exe - Entry point not found AcquireSRWLockExclusive procedure entry point not found in the dynamic link library KERNEL32.dll Tested on Windows 10: "unable to find locale data files. Please reinstall" Google Chrome 79.0.3945.88 Stable x64 - 20191219 Tested on Windows 10: "unable to find locale data files. Please reinstall" Chinese modified version: http://www.qiuquan.cc/browser/chrome.html -Liebao aka Cheetah Secure Browser by Kingsoft (new added to the list) Official version: https://www.liebao.cn/ Change language Chinese to English: https://malwaretips.com/threads/liebao-cheetah-browser.381 Portable https://www.portablesoft.org/down/3022/ -Maxthom (Blink + Trident + Webkit) Official version: https://www.maxthon.com/ -QQ Browser (Blink + Trident) Official version (be careful, better not to install, it can be a terrible virus/spyware and extrope all your computer with a lot of publicity) https://browser.qq.com/ -Sogou Explorer (there is only in Chinese language) Official version: https://ie.sogou.com/ Modified version in China: http://www.qiuquan.cc/browser/sogouexplorer.html OK on Windows XP, on Windows 10 it gives the following error: w10 error xx183 cannot create a file that already exists -UC Browser (Chromium 55) Official version: http://www.ucweb.com/ucbrowser/download/ Modified version in China (it is possible to change the language to English after browsing the menu in Chinese): http://www.qiuquan.cc/browser/ucbrower.html -Only a Chinese explorer does not work with Windows XP, this is Cent Browser. I am mainly using 360 Extreme Explorer, now with the modified version in Russia on a Pentium IV 3.06 Ghz with HT / FSB 533 / RAM 2 GiB / hard disk ATA-133 rpm 5400 K-Meleon and New Moon @roytam1 do not work at a decent speed on this Windows XP computer exploring several tabs on various classes of web pages (for example XDA developers). Although these do work very quickly on the same computer with Windows 2000 (the version number is different). While: 360 Extreme Explorer 11.1.1141.0 works very fast on Windows XP. 360 Extreme Explorer 12.0.1014.0 beta? It doesn't work so fast on Windows XP. So my decision is 360 Extreme Explorer 11.1.1141.0 This works very very fast until I open 30-40 tabs, then 360 starts to pull cache memory and becomes very very slow. Also when I close 360 Extreme Explorer and reopen with more than 15 tabs it takes 20-30 minutes to be available, as well as slows down the entire Windows XP operating system, not being able to use even the Windows file explorer in those 20-30 minutes that is cache memory working. I ask you for instructions to eliminate 360 Extreme Explorer working with cache memory and to reduce the number of tabs that are kept in RAM at the same time. I have the desktop shortcut with "-disk-cache-size- <0>" but it doesn't seem to work: "C: \ EXPLORERS \ 360 Extreme Explorer (Russian version) \ Chrome \ Application \ 360chrome.exe" -disk-cache-size- <0> --disable-logging --disable-component-update --disable-background- networking --allow-outdated-plugins --cipher-suite-blacklist = 0xcc14

Yes, that will work in Windows 2000 as well. That also disables the condensed menus.

What a funny problem Try this one : @echo off setlocal enableextensions enabledelayedexpansion set Username=Test set choice=nothing if "%Username%"=="Test" ( set /p choice=Do you want to continue? [y/n] echo You entered: !choice! pause ) The truth is inline... bye