Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/30/2019 in all areas

  1. Note about Mirrored.to: Site: https://www.mirrored.to After having tested many Filesharings, here is my selection of Free Filehostings (6) for Mirrored.to: (No registration required, No waiting time, No advertising, Fast downloads, etc...) My goal is to to provide a list of Free Filehosting: 100% free and of course with NO spamming, advertising, registration, solicitation, download delay, profanity or otherwise... This includes and is not limited to links via cash sites (including rewards for downloads), affiliate marketing, and links requiring a premium/ paid account to access. And from there to provoke an exchange of experience, to receive suggestions, other URLs, etc.. My Selection of Free Filehosting (6) on: 2023/12/28
    1 point
  2. Sadly, this came too late, but please try it. It's based on the same AMDXHC driver for Windows XP, but this required just a device check patch. Included are both 32-bit (x86) and 64-bit (x64) drivers, plus the "switch" driver. - The AMDXHC driver is safe to use and easily installed. - Supports all Intel USB 3.1 XHCI controllers (7, 8, 9, 100, 200 and 300 series, maybe even HEDT chipsets). - "Switch" driver may be needed if you don't get USB3 speeds on Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge and Haswell (*) systems (7, 8 and 9 series chipsets). To use this, I'd recommend a backup. Open Device Manager -> System Devices -> PCI Bus Update driver -> Browse my computer for driver software -> Let me pick from a list of device drivers on my computer Have Disk -> open the folder containing the HCSwitch driver files PCI Bus will be displayed, continue the installation. When finished, just restart Vista. (*) Haswell should work with Vista 32-bit (x86) only. http://www.mediafire.com/file/1kjhhl0fq1ofc2m The original Intel XHCI driver can be modded to work on Vista, but as this one works so fine, I don't have any plans to do it.
    1 point
  3. Here an awesome filehosting: "workupload.com", it is similar to solidfiles.com or zippyshare.com, but has more advantages. Their service is also completely free and you also don't need to register. Upload and download file size is up to 2 GB, files remain 90 days online instead of 30 (zippyshare.com), you can bulk downloads files (more than 1 file at the time), unlimited files, fast downloads etc... And if you register for free, you can manage your files (delete, move, set how many times they may be downloaded, set a delete date), 50 GB file space. Start uploading without registration: https://workupload.com More info: https://workupload.com/about and/or https://workupload.com/faq
    1 point
  4. ... But mere mortals running Vista SP2 32-bit are, once again , excluded from even trying to run that application on their Vista copy... If you had tried on (regular) Windows XP SP3 32-bit with lowering the subsystem version in the PE header to 5.1 (it's set to 6.0 by default), I guess a similar error, pertaining to win32 apps, is to be expected, as the application is NOT win32, compiled to be only runnable in the 64-bit architecture... What I can see , based on your attached screengrab, is that the app was compiled using version 5.9.7 of the Qt Framework, which in itself provokes major surprise on yours truly... ; I have always known, and that knowledge is based on official Qt documentation, that the last Vista-compatible version of the framework was 5.6 (5.6.3 to be exact!), and only on client machines : https://doc.qt.io/archives/qt-5.6/supported-platforms.html ... whereas v5.9 of Qt has zero support for Vista (and, of course, XP): https://doc.qt.io/qt-5.9/supported-platforms.html Any explanation as to how a Qt 5.9 built application is able to launch under Vista SP2 64-bit is highly welcome (if somebody can provide one ) ... For official system requirements, see @win32 's post; so, your assumption is not correct, as Vista (64-bit only) isn't officially supported! Given that the PE-header in the main executable is set at a subsys version of 6.0, at least our beloved OS was taken into consideration in that regard, but who can say which NT version the actual build-time compiler optimisations were targeting? As detailed above, I remain quite sceptical this is indeed running under Vista SP2 64-bit... OT: I hope you all had a great Xmas Day, surrounded by your loved ones; best wishes for the New Year, too!
    1 point
  5. Only for the record (since the given link is also for CMD.EXE and 2K/XP), ALL those are - if not "wrong" - "inferior" to this nice shell extension: http://www.roggel.com/NGNeer/BackgroundCMD/index.shtml jaclaz
    1 point
  6. was browsing reddit, aaaaaaand... QuickTime updater on Windows XP.
    1 point
  7. Merry Christmas! http://o.rths.ml/gpc/files1.rt/K-Meleon1.5.4en-US.tls12.7z most of GRE components are replaced with Retrozilla-based build (but not all)
    1 point
  8. My Selection of Free Filehosting (15) on: 2023/12/28 Site: Retention: https://download.gg (Until 25GB by file - Unlimited retention) https://filen.io (10GB of Free Space for Registered User) https://files.fm (60 days from last download) https://gofile.io (15 days (guest) or 6 months (registered) from last download) https://hexupload.net (60 days from last download) https://krakenfiles.com (Retention for as long as possible) https://mediafire.com (15 days (guest) or 6 months (registered) from last download) https://megaup.net (60 days from last download) https://mirrored.to (Multiple Free Filehosting sites) https://pastebin.com (You decide if you want your pastes to "expire") https://pixeldrain.com (90 days from last download) https://send.cm (30 days from last download) https://swisstransfer.com (30 days from last download) https://upload.ee (50 days (guest) or 120 days (registered) from last download) https://workupload.com (90 days from last download) My goal is to to provide a list of Free Filehosting: 100% free and of course with NO spamming, advertising, captcha, registration, solicitation, download delay, profanity or otherwise... This includes and is not limited to links via cash sites (including rewards for downloads), affiliate marketing, and links requiring a premium/paid account to access. And from there to provoke an exchange of experience, to receive suggestions, other URLs, etc..
    1 point
  9. @msfntor I would expect Arctic Fox to require the same LAV video .dll's as NM 27 for video playback to work. (IIRC there's a FAQ in post 1 of this thread with the links to these .dll's.) But I haven't confirmed if they work with Arctic Fox myself. It wasn't clear whether that was addressed to the OP or to me. So just to clarify, I don't have uBO or uBO Updater installed in FF 45 at all. I only use FF 45 for testing, so I've kept the installation as "clean" as I can. I do have both extensions installed in Serpent 55, probably from GitHub (I know I got uBO itself from there), and both auto-updated fine. But it's certainly possible the OP installed uBO Updater from APO (I of course don't know). If the version on APO differs from the one on GitHub (I'm too lazy to download them and check), that could indeed explain its failure to auto-update on his system. That aside, what I think you're saying is that uBO Updater redirects update requests to GitHub not only for uBO, but also for itself. Which makes sense now that you mention it. Interestingly, uBO Updater not only auto-updated my uBO installation on Dec. 16, but also auto-updated itself on Dec. 18, presumably after GitHub made the changes that required the fix to uBO Updater in the first place. So now that I know the backstory, I'm rather surprised it auto-updated for me or anyone. (But I'm not complaining!)
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...