All Activity

@bookie32 -- after a whole page of derailment, did the above link solve your issue? the discussion in that link can very easily be converted to a desktop .bat file.

No. But more importantly, why the derailing of the OP's topic?

As far as I can tell, it is Thorium that is behaving identical to Ungoogled Chromium v114 as far as fonts on Digital Spy. But I'm unsure if they are doing what they are being "told" to do (at least as far as the first issue, you seem to have two issues here). In any programming language, there is always a degree of "junk in, junk out". You have two things going on. First, your style sheet is MISSING the closing }. Your style sheet should read - from body {font-family: unset !important; to body {font-family: unset !important;} (note that the only difference is the } at the very end. Thorium and Ungoogled v114 both seem to add this missing } "for you". Second, Digital Spy &/or Stylus is not applying your style sheet for "body" to "body h4" (unsure what the official CSS guideline is on this). In your style sheet for Digital Spy, change it - from body {font-family: unset !important;} to body, body * {font-family: unset !important;} (note the added , body * so we catch not only "body" but "body h4" and "body h2", both being used at Digital Spy)

Holy crap, it adds and runs a dedicated service! "Assistant"

I think we all understood it as you use it at home, too, no?

Thank you for calling things for what they are.

The Chrome engine is bloated, it's no surprise, DDR4 improves the situation. Very little the they can do.

You can't support normal, constructive dialog, when you have been caught and got nothing to answer, you simply resort to insults. So I can only suggest the same to you, account #2.

I don't use the kernel, I did, but locally (it wasn't installed into the system). Neither Thorium, nor Supermium need it.

Thank you.

Yes, there's such kind of behaviour in Win 7.

Very strange, I can post different links. I remember some users that were constantly posting random youtube videos were restricted, but you never spammed this forum. So, it's strange, indeed. As proof I can post: Crocodile Monitor (Varanus salvadorii) https://a-z-animals.com/animals/crocodile-monitor/

Good decision! Hi to you, too!

Me too. Then click in the reply box and it should auto-fill with your previous draft. I use Opera Mini (latest) on Android 11.

The website of the largest Russian social network has stopped opening. Returns an error: https://ibb.co/XS2StnJ

When installing what? SAB or Windows?

@Cixert It's not that simple to switch over to ACPI with an existing XP install. @Dietmar knows how to do it properly and can help.

But where did you read account #2 that I never used what I recommend? If you want I can recommend a very good psychiatrist.

I don't know if this message that appears in the post is correct. It seems that this board does not have APIC and that the IRQs are limited. The strange thing is that when I installed Windows XP it identified the board as "Standard PC" and not "ACPI PC". I try to install the HAL ACPI manually and the following blue screen occurs. I don't know if it affects the fact that when installing Windows XP the acpi .sys driver will not be installed and if now I have to install this driver manually in addition to the HAL.

As this is a hotfix and it was never released on Windows Update there is barely any info about KB3078919 except for the Microsoft link. The way I understood it is that this hotfix may only be useful for eMMC cards version 4.41 or higher. Older cards would not require it. Or then again this could be a 8.1 problem only... Edit : I just verified and Windows 8 received updates to dumpsd.sys and sdbus.sys through Security/Cumulative Updates until 2019 !! Windows 8.1 never received any updates to those files beyond 2015 for some reason. So I guess this hotfix is indeed only needed for 8.1 then. I do wonder now if it's possible to go the other way around now -> using those updated W8 files on W8.1

@Cixert You may as well try it and see if it works for you. What ACPI BSOD are you getting btw? have you got a screenshot.

I will try it. Currently I also have the problem that the system does not allow me to post links that link to the MSFN forum itself. I don't understand the reason and if it happens to anyone else.

Thanks, I didn't know that. I will look at it. Although this seems like it's for modern hardware, it's not my circumstance...

@Cixert Have you tried the updated community made 7777 acpi.sys?

Hate to say it, but for the time being I'm also giving up on both until they improve, both are not usable on my aged systems.