Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Looks like mica to me, do you have Dark Magic on? There have been some changes recently with that. Edit:
  3. Install the extension SQLite Manager 0.8.3.1 from the Classic Add-ons Archive! This extension can manage sqlite files such as your webappsstore.sqlite inside New Moon. BTW, my file is only about 12 MB. With SQLite Manager 0.8.3.1, you can view all entries, add new ones, edit or delete old ones. My webappsstore.sqlite files in different profiles are of different sizes from 96 KB up to 12 MB.
  4. Never heard of it. Though they have clearly been around for a while. Had to look it up, I've visited California but still have never heard of it.
  5. Hello Since version 3.7.7 (or before) the tooltips of the icons in the systray are "bigger", I would like to return to the same as with previous versions SAB 3.7.2 : SAB 3.7.7 : There was a registry key to change this, I believe If yes, which one is it ? Thanks
  6. My NM27, NM28, Mypal27, and St52 are all the same exact size as far as my "webappsstore.sqlite" --
  7. Today
  8. Sorry, it was already commented above...
  9. Ok I installed back v368.81 with 45 edited inf files, 3dmark2001se finalized benchmark without freeze issue but need to test more. it doesnt always freeze at first tests. Score: 40818 (better than v344.75) my results: EDIT: Just installed NFS Most Wanted, while launching game nv4 display driver stopped responding, freezed, had to hard reset the pc. EDIT2: This time I turned off MSI Afterburner and Riva Tuner (latest version) and launched NFS Most wanted and played fine but while benchmarking 2nd time with 3dmark2001 freezed again. seems modified v368.81 is not good either.
  10. Wow, maybe they aren't removing the code? I'm wondering if it's still there because they just can't remove it due to some sort of old Vista spaghetti code keeping it hidden there. Hence the feature flag to break it and not just stripping it out like they did with the system tray. There must be something that will break if they remove it otherwise it would have been gone already OR they realize that their most dedicated users still like it and it's not harming anything so they are throwing us a bone. One of the two. It probably doesn't help that there's yet another new person in charge of Windows and Surface. If they'd just add small taskbar buttons and provide some API to allow for overlays on the taskbar so apps like Traffic Monitor and NetWorx work correctly and don't have icons overlap them I'd use the Win 11 taskbar. If it is removed maybe it's a possibility to mod the new taskbar and make it better instead of a full rewrite if a full rewrite is even possible given the complexity.
  11. @Mark-XP or eax, eax ; If eax was zero, the zero flag will be set. If eax was non-zero, the zero flag will be cleared Dietmar
  12. Install the extension SQLite Manager 0.8.3.1 from the Classic Add-ons Archive! This extension can manage sqlite files such as your webappsstore.sqlite inside New Moon. BTW, my file is only about 12 MB.
  13. good. fixed wrong second screen workspace 🫠 one problem but i don t know if it comes from windows or from startallback but when connect and disconnect devices the navigation pane does not refresh /update. (this happen in Canary)
  14. You mean it's in the hands of Shakey's Pizza? Shakey's Pizza bought Microsoft?
  15. or eax, eax - what does that do? Is this ment to initialize the Flags OF, CF or modify the SF, ZF, PF Flag!
  16. My "webappsstore.sqlite" in New Moon is 150 MB. When I view it with a text editor, I see it full of JavaScript and keywords apparently related to advertising from Shopify and similar domains. This is a ridiculous amount of data. Can I see in the browser to whom this data belongs to, and clear it without deleting this file in its entirety?
  17. Update notification! As already reported , the Root Certificates have been updated and are now from 26-03-2024. Here are screenshots of both updaters: Therefore, my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) will also be updated if I can somehow trick this crappy forum post editor. Cheers, AstroSkipper
  18. 26090 is out with no watermark. Anyone running it with SAB... how is the taskbar looking?
  19. @jumper I do not think, that always the register is set to ECX = Null. Only, when the first 2 highest bytes are also 00 00. Because in this case, my fake function from above would always work. Can you please explain me in detail, what you think about the work of ExInterlockedFlushSList. "If an SList node is present, it must be processed (Next and Depth zeroed). A pointer to the next node in the list must be returned." This sounds for me, that something of the original list hast to be given back to the calling function via the register ECX, means ECX not Null, if a real list exist. But from the code I see, that the last 16 bits of ECX for sure are set to zero, mov ebp, ecx means, that now the original pointer in ecx to the list is rescued is ebp. mov edx, [ebp+4] means, that this original content in ram, to what the pointer shiftet by 4 bytes = 32 bit point and now those bytes are stored in edx. In EBP is the original pointer stored from ECX. It points to the lowest byte of the 64 real bits in Ram. So, now EDX contains the whole higher 32 bits (not a pointer) from the original 64 Bit in Ram. In EAX is with mov eax, [ebp+0] the original content of the 32 lower bits, from original 64 bits in Ram. With mov ecx, edx are now in ECX also the 32 higher bits from Ram (no pointer any more). With mov cx, bx now for sure the lowest 16 bit in ECX are set to 00 00, because EBX is empty at all. What is now in ECX? The 2 Highest Bytes from the original 64 bits in Ram, with 00 00 at its end. in [EBP+0] is still the Pointer to the lowest byte in ram, but with [ ] it becomes the real 64 original bit in Ram. Now, the lower 32 bit from the original 64 bit in Ram are compared with the content of EAX. In EAX are also the 32 lower bits, so the same bits as at the adress of [EBP+0]. So, no loop at all, the Zero flag is set. Nothing is changed in the list. But ECX= 2 highest bytes from the original 64 bits in ram, followed by 00 00. Even no value is direct returned from this function, ECX contains the 2 highest Bytes from original 64 bits in ram. EBP and EBX are set from the stack back to there original value before the function is used. In EAX are still the 32 lower bits from the original 64 bits in Ram. in EDX are still the 32 higher bits from Ram. So, nothing from the list is lost, only her pointer to the still untouched 64 original bits in ram. So, where is flush? Only the pointer to the 64 bit in ram is complete destroyed.
  20. Fantastic! So it just works? At such high resolution? Did you patch it in any form?
  21. Now for someone who can try to make an iceberg for lost Windows software made in the 1990s til the early-2010s. One has to find more to fill in the iceberg to begin with.
  22. According to Device Manager, device id is "PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_128B&SUBSYS_85E71043&REV_A1\4&2E5EAC9&0&0008" According to GPU-Z, device id is "10DE 128B - 1043 85E7" What i used in nvaci.inf in v344.75 : %NVIDIA_DEV.128B% = Section001, PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_128B&SUBSYS_85E71043&REV_A1 and NVIDIA_DEV.128B = "NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 what could be correct line(s) for my exact device id? NOTE: attached nvaci.inf is based on 368.81 as an example. there only GT710 i see is > NVIDIA_DEV.1140.0841.1025 = "NVIDIA GeForce 710M" nvaci.inf
  23. FYI, due to the fact that the MSFN forum editor is totally broken and hasn't been working properly for months, especially when it comes to inserting of links , I wasn't able to edit my main article ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use the last weeks. Unfortunately, I have to revise and to change some content in this article to be hopefully able again to edit it and to add the links for the new offline Root Certificate Updaters. This all is very annoying and time-consuming.
  24. I agree - there are far too many distributions and I wish the focus could be on the main reliable ones.
  25. I mean, after all, v344.75 is not supported officially by nvidia for this specific card model. anyway other (later) drivers which are supposed to support are problematic too.. maybe lack of tests and poor driver config.
  26. Thank you! i didnt know all those .inf files need to be edited. Do you think this edit fixes freeze issue? I will test it and write my experiences here. it is really odd that non of the drivers working correctly and stable for GT 710 officially.. I think nvidia didnt care about winXP at all after releasing this card. but in other hand, GT 730 is working perfectly and better (at least 25% more performance) comparing GT710.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...