Sign In
Register
Help
Putty x86 v0.55 (Windows Installer)
Switch: /sp- /silent
Full syntax: putty-0.55-installer.exe /sp- /silent
Extraction needed: No
Page 1 of 1
Putty x86 Installer (silent!)
Rate Topic:
MultiQuote
Report
#2
- Follow the rules please :-)
-
- Group: Patrons
- Posts: 6,783
- Joined: 14-November 03
- Gender:Male
- OS:Windows 7 x64
- Location:Bangalore, India
-
Country:
Posted 06 September 2004 - 07:03 AM
thanks for sharing the info with us.
Although, I believe it'd have been better to have in the official thread of switches.
The switches look like it uses the Inno-setup installer. If so, the "/VERYSILENT /SP-" switch can also be used.
Although, I believe it'd have been better to have in the official thread of switches.
The switches look like it uses the Inno-setup installer. If so, the "/VERYSILENT /SP-" switch can also be used.
#3
Posted 06 September 2004 - 07:10 AM
prathapml, on Sep 6 2004, 08:03 AM, said:
thanks for sharing the info with us.
Although, I believe it'd have been better to have in the official thread of switches.
The switches look like it uses the Inno-setup installer. If so, the "/VERYSILENT /SP-" switch can also be used.
Although, I believe it'd have been better to have in the official thread of switches.
The switches look like it uses the Inno-setup installer. If so, the "/VERYSILENT /SP-" switch can also be used.
Cool,
I pretty much don't care for the "official threads" as it negates the power of the wonderful search tool at the bottom. It takes too long to traverse a handfull (or more) of pages in a single thread when a properly formated subject-line in a single thread returns the information I'm looking for much faster. It's certainly fine if someone wishes to cross-post the info into an "official thread" though.
#4
- Senior Member
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 617
- Joined: 27-July 03
Posted 06 September 2004 - 08:05 AM
I can only fully agree with jordanal. A 40 pages thread isn't nice to search. You search for "putty", the you get the 40 pages thread, but there is no way to know witch page contain what your looking for!
Those thread are useless and don't expect people to read 40 pages before posting...
Those thread are useless and don't expect people to read 40 pages before posting...
#5
- Follow the rules please :-)
-
- Group: Patrons
- Posts: 6,783
- Joined: 14-November 03
- Gender:Male
- OS:Windows 7 x64
- Location:Bangalore, India
-
Country:
Posted 06 September 2004 - 09:06 AM
Ha ha ha...
So let's replace 40 pages of thread with (40pagesx30posts=1200topics) - hmm.... that sort of, sounds frightening to me. Am I the only one saying so?
So let's replace 40 pages of thread with (40pagesx30posts=1200topics) - hmm.... that sort of, sounds frightening to me. Am I the only one saying so?
#6
Posted 23 May 2005 - 07:40 PM
I also agree with jordanal.
The search function of this forum would be totally useless if I still have to click possibly 40 times to find the right switch I am looking for.
About prathapml's concern on (40pagesx30posts=1200topics), it won't be hard to create another forum for just unattended application switches. And people using that forum would only be adding new application switches or search for them, it would really fully optimize the search function that this forum has.
And I think the rules that should have on that forum should be a standarize title name for applications switches.
eg. Putty x86 v0.56 (Windows Installer)
just my 2cent
The search function of this forum would be totally useless if I still have to click possibly 40 times to find the right switch I am looking for.
About prathapml's concern on (40pagesx30posts=1200topics), it won't be hard to create another forum for just unattended application switches. And people using that forum would only be adding new application switches or search for them, it would really fully optimize the search function that this forum has.
And I think the rules that should have on that forum should be a standarize title name for applications switches.
eg. Putty x86 v0.56 (Windows Installer)
just my 2cent
Page 1 of 1